Role of Cystatin C in Assessing Kidney Function and Estimating GFR
Cystatin C is a valuable biomarker for kidney function assessment that provides more accurate GFR estimation than creatinine alone, especially in specific populations where creatinine may be unreliable, and should be used as a confirmatory test in patients with borderline kidney function. 1, 2
Characteristics of Cystatin C
- Cystatin C is a protein from the cystatin superfamily of cysteine proteinase inhibitors expressed in all nucleated cells, produced at a constant rate, not secreted, and catabolized in the tubules without returning to bloodstream 1
- Unlike creatinine, cystatin C is independent of age, sex, and muscle mass, making it particularly valuable in populations where creatinine may be unreliable 1, 2
- Serum cystatin C can detect kidney dysfunction at an earlier stage than creatinine, with studies showing it begins to increase when GFR falls below 88 mL/min/1.73m², while creatinine only increases when GFR falls below 75 mL/min/1.73m² 3
Clinical Applications
Confirmatory Testing
- KDIGO guidelines recommend measuring cystatin C in adults with eGFRcreat 45–59 mL/min/1.73m² who do not have markers of kidney damage if confirmation of CKD is required 2, 1
- If eGFRcys/eGFRcreat-cys is ≥60 mL/min/1.73m², the diagnosis of CKD is not confirmed 1
- GFR estimation using cystatin C alone or in combination with creatinine improves risk stratification for adverse outcomes 2
Combined Use with Creatinine
- The combination of creatinine and cystatin C (eGFRcr-cys) provides the most accurate GFR estimation and should be used when available 2, 1
- When cystatin C is measured, creatinine should be measured on the same sample to enable calculation of eGFRcr-cys 2
- A model incorporating both cystatin C and serum creatinine was found superior to those utilizing either marker alone to predict clearance of carboplatin in cancer patients 2
Special Populations
- Cystatin C is especially useful in patients with:
Implementation Considerations
Laboratory Standards
- Clinical laboratories should measure serum cystatin C using an assay with calibration traceable to international standard reference materials 2
- Cystatin C concentration should be reported rounded to the nearest 100th of a whole number when expressed as conventional units (mg/L) 2
- Laboratories should ensure precise measurement (coefficient of variation <2.0% for cystatin C) with desirable bias (<3.2% for cystatin C) 2
Limitations
- Despite its advantages, cystatin C assays are not widely available in many countries 1
- Cystatin C testing is more expensive than creatinine, though costs are decreasing 2
- Non-GFR determinants that can affect cystatin C levels include:
Algorithm for Clinical Use of Cystatin C
Initial Assessment: Use creatinine-based eGFR (eGFRcr) for routine screening of kidney function 2
When to Add Cystatin C:
Interpretation:
Follow-up: For confirmed CKD, either marker can be used for monitoring, though consistency in the method is recommended 2
Conclusion
Cystatin C provides significant advantages over creatinine alone for GFR estimation, particularly in specific populations and clinical scenarios. The combination of creatinine and cystatin C offers the most accurate assessment of kidney function and should be utilized when available and clinically indicated.