Is low-dose computed tomography (CT) suitable for patients with multiple myeloma?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 31, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Whole Body Low-Dose CT for Multiple Myeloma

Whole body low-dose CT (WBLDCT) is strongly recommended as the primary imaging modality for patients with multiple myeloma, as it significantly outperforms conventional skeletal surveys in detecting bone lesions. 1, 2

Advantages of WBLDCT in Multiple Myeloma

  • WBLDCT detects 25.5% more osteolytic lesions compared to conventional skeletal surveys, leading to treatment changes in up to 20% of patients 2, 1, 3
  • WBLDCT is particularly superior for detecting abnormalities in the spine and pelvis, as well as the skull and ribs, which are difficult to visualize with skeletal surveys 2, 1
  • WBLDCT is faster to perform and more convenient for patients, with radiation doses of 3.2-4.8 mSv, significantly lower than standard CT protocols 1, 4
  • WBLDCT extends from skull vertex to knees without requiring intravenous contrast, which should generally be avoided in myeloma patients 1, 2

WBLDCT Technical Specifications

  • Recommended detector configuration: 80×0.5 mm, with scanning range in a single spiral acquisition from skull to proximal femoral bones 4
  • Standard parameters: tube voltage 120 kVp, current tube time product 86 mAs, slice thickness 1 mm 4
  • Two sets of axial images should be reconstructed - one for bone assessment and one for soft tissue evaluation 4
  • Secondary coronal and sagittal reconstructions should be generated for comprehensive evaluation 4

Comparison with Other Imaging Modalities

  • FDG-PET/CT is an acceptable alternative to WBLDCT, offering additional value in detecting extramedullary disease and metabolically active lesions 2, 3
  • If using PET/CT instead of WBLDCT, the CT component must have imaging quality equivalent to WBLDCT, not just for attenuation correction 2, 1
  • MRI is particularly useful when WBLDCT or FDG PET/CT is negative, especially to differentiate between smoldering myeloma and active multiple myeloma 2, 1
  • The LDCT co-registered to PET has shown comparable performance to standalone WBLDCT (sensitivity 89.4%, specificity 98.3%, accuracy 93.5%), suggesting potential for using PET/CT as a single multimodal imaging method 5

Imaging Protocol Recommendations

  • For initial diagnostic workup, either WBLDCT or FDG PET/CT is recommended by the NCCN Panel 2, 1
  • Conventional skeletal survey should only be used when advanced imaging is not available (e.g., in low-resource settings) 2, 1
  • For follow-up after treatment, the same imaging modality used during initial workup should be used for consistency 1, 3
  • Assessment should be performed at minimum every 3 months during active treatment 1, 3

Clinical Considerations

  • A middle-frequency reconstruction algorithm (B50f kernel) has proven beneficial for all energy protocols 6
  • Image quality may be reduced in patients with diffuse skeletal infiltration or concurrent osteoporosis 6
  • WBLDCT is obligatory at diagnosis but not required during response assessment unless symptoms develop, according to the EHA-ESMO clinical practice guidelines 2
  • PET-CT is optional at diagnosis but obligatory to confirm imaging MRD (minimal residual disease) negativity 2

WBLDCT represents a significant advancement in multiple myeloma imaging, providing superior detection of bone lesions with reasonable radiation exposure and should be the standard imaging approach for these patients.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.