What are the indications for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 1, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Indications for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)

ERCP is primarily indicated for therapeutic interventions rather than diagnostic purposes, with the main indication being management of common bile duct (CBD) stones, which can be cleared in 80-95% of cases with balloon sweep techniques. 1

Primary Therapeutic Indications

  • Management of CBD stones, which remains the most common indication for ERCP 1, 2
  • Stent placement for obstructive jaundice, with success rates >90% for distal CBD strictures 1
  • Acute gallstone pancreatitis with cholangitis, which significantly reduces mortality and complications 3
  • Gallstone pancreatitis with common bile duct obstruction 3
  • Severe gallstone pancreatitis without clinical improvement within 48 hours 3
  • Biliary drainage in cases of persistent biliary obstruction 2
  • Management of biliary and pancreatic disorders in patients who are not surgical candidates 2

Specific Clinical Scenarios Warranting ERCP

  • High suspicion of CBD stones based on clinical presentation, laboratory findings, or imaging studies 2
  • Jaundice with elevated bilirubin levels suggesting biliary obstruction 2
  • Visible stones in the common bile duct on imaging 2
  • Cholangitis or infection of the bile ducts 2
  • Increasingly deranged liver function tests with signs of cholangitis 3

Diagnostic Role of ERCP

  • ERCP currently has an almost exclusively therapeutic role due to advances in non-invasive imaging such as MRCP 1
  • ERCP is not useful in jaundice caused by hepatitis/sepsis, alcoholic liver disease, or drug toxicity 1
  • For tissue diagnosis, ERCP-guided brushing or FNA can be performed with sensitivity between 57.1-82.4% for pancreatic neoplasms 1

Risks and Considerations

  • Major complications occur in 4-5.2% of cases, including pancreatitis, cholangitis, hemorrhage, and perforation 1
  • Mortality risk is approximately 0.4% 1
  • Risk of iatrogenic pancreatitis is up to 10% following sphincterotomy 1, 2
  • ERCP should be performed under antibiotic cover to reduce infection risk 3
  • Technical difficulties may arise in patients with previous gastroenteric anastomoses 1

Special Considerations

  • In patients with suspected sclerosing cholangitis or biliary stricture, ERCP should be performed with caution due to risk of suppurative cholangitis 1
  • For stones >15 mm in size, ERCP alone is often not successful, requiring advanced endoscopic techniques 1
  • In pediatric patients with choledocholithiasis, a surgery-first approach may be preferable as 69% of cases have findings amenable to surgical management without preoperative ERCP 4
  • Prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting has significantly reduced the risk of severe post-ERCP pancreatitis 5

Technical Success Rates

  • CBD stone clearance: 80-95% success rate 1, 2
  • Stent placement for distal CBD strictures: >90% success rate 1
  • Successful cannulation of the ampulla of Vater can be achieved in up to 97% of cases 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

ERCP Before Cholecystectomy: Indications and Benefits

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Indications for ERCP in Biliary Pancreatitis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Difficult biliary access for ERCP.

Current gastroenterology reports, 2012

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.