Repeat Urinalysis to Confirm True Microscopic Hematuria
Your initial urinalysis shows a critical discrepancy: the report states "microscopic hematuria" but microscopic examination reveals NO RBCs—this is not hematuria and requires confirmation with repeat microscopic urinalysis before any further workup.
Understanding the Discrepancy
- The presence of "microscopic hematuria" on a report without actual RBCs visible on microscopic examination suggests either a false-positive dipstick result or contamination 1, 2
- Dipstick positivity must always be confirmed with microscopic analysis showing ≥3 RBCs per high-power field before initiating any hematuria workup 1, 3
- Dipstick testing has limited specificity (65-99%) and can produce false positives from myoglobin, hemoglobin, or other substances 4, 2
- The squamous epithelial cells (1-5) suggest possible contamination from the collection technique 2
Immediate Next Steps
Repeat urinalysis with proper collection technique:
- Obtain a freshly voided, clean-catch, midstream urine specimen for microscopic examination 4
- Ensure the specimen is not collected during menstruation (if applicable) 3, 2
- Avoid collection within 48 hours of vigorous exercise or sexual activity 3
- The specimen should be examined fresh, not stored 4
Definition of True Microscopic Hematuria
- True microscopic hematuria requires ≥3 RBCs per high-power field on microscopic evaluation of urinary sediment from two of three properly collected specimens 4, 2
- A single urinalysis showing no RBCs does NOT meet criteria for hematuria evaluation 4
If Repeat Testing Confirms No RBCs
- No further hematuria workup is indicated if repeat microscopic examination continues to show 0 RBCs 4, 1
- The rare bacteria noted may represent contamination given the absence of WBCs and should not trigger treatment in an asymptomatic patient 3
- Reassure the patient and return to routine care 3
If Repeat Testing Shows ≥3 RBCs/HPF
Only if confirmed hematuria is present on repeat testing should you proceed with:
- Risk stratification based on age, smoking history, and occupational exposures 1, 3
- Examination of urinary sediment for dysmorphic RBCs (>80% suggests glomerular source) 3, 2
- Assessment for proteinuria and serum creatinine to evaluate for glomerular disease 3, 2
- Exclusion of benign causes including urinary tract infection (obtain culture if suspected) 3
Risk Factors Requiring Enhanced Evaluation
- Age >40 years (women) or >60 years (men) 1, 3
- Smoking history >10 pack-years 1, 3
- Occupational exposure to benzenes or aromatic amines 4, 3
- History of gross hematuria, irritative voiding symptoms, or pelvic irradiation 4, 3
Common Pitfall to Avoid
- Never proceed with cystoscopy, imaging, or urologic referral based on dipstick results alone without microscopic confirmation of ≥3 RBCs/HPF 1, 3, 2
- Do not attribute dipstick positivity to anticoagulation without confirming true hematuria microscopically 1, 3
- The presence of rare bacteria without pyuria (WBCs) in an asymptomatic patient does not warrant antibiotic treatment 3