Presentation and Management of Carcinoma of the Stomach
Gastric carcinoma typically presents with non-specific symptoms including weight loss, dyspepsia, early satiety, vomiting, and dysphagia, with iron-deficiency anemia often being the only presenting sign; diagnosis requires endoscopic biopsy, and management centers on surgical resection with perioperative chemotherapy for resectable disease. 1
Clinical Presentation
Common Symptoms
- Weight loss (unexplained) is one of the most frequent presenting features 2
- Dyspepsia (persistent indigestion) warrants investigation, especially when it doesn't respond to standard therapy 2
- Early satiety indicates reduced gastric capacity from tumor burden 2
- Vomiting, particularly when persistent or unexplained 2
- Dysphagia suggests tumor involvement of the gastroesophageal junction or proximal stomach 2
- Iron-deficiency anemia may be the only presenting sign and should never be dismissed without investigation 1, 2
Risk Factors to Elicit in History
- Helicobacter pylori infection is the major modifiable risk factor 1, 2
- Male gender (incidence 1.5 times higher than females) 1
- Smoking significantly increases risk 1, 2
- High salt diet is associated with increased risk 1
- Atrophic gastritis or pernicious anemia 1
- Family history of gastric cancer or hereditary cancer syndromes (HNPCC, FAP) 1
- Previous partial gastrectomy 2
Diagnostic Workup
Essential Initial Investigations
- Endoscopy with biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis and must obtain tissue for histological classification and molecular biomarkers (particularly HER2 status) 1
- Full blood count to assess for iron-deficiency anemia 1
- Liver and renal function tests to determine treatment options 1
- Physical examination including assessment for palpable masses, ascites, and lymphadenopathy 1
Staging Investigations
Contrast-enhanced CT scan of thorax, abdomen, and pelvis is the primary staging modality to detect lymphadenopathy, metastatic disease, and ascites 1
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) provides accurate assessment of T and N stage in potentially operable tumors and determines proximal/distal tumor extent 1
Diagnostic laparoscopy with peritoneal washings is recommended for all patients with resectable gastric cancer who are candidates for perioperative chemotherapy to exclude occult peritoneal metastases 1
- Patients with positive cytology (CY+) are uncertain candidates for curative resection 1
PET-CT is not routinely recommended for initial staging but may improve detection of occult metastatic disease in selected cases 1
Assessment of nutritional status should be performed to detect dietary deficiencies in both localized and advanced disease 1
Staging System
- TNM staging according to the 8th edition AJCC/UICC should be documented 1
Management Approach
Multidisciplinary Team Planning
Multidisciplinary treatment planning is mandatory before any treatment decision and should include surgeons, medical and radiation oncologists, gastroenterologists, radiologists, pathologists, dieticians, and nurse specialists 1
Treatment by Stage
Very Early Gastric Cancer (T1a)
Endoscopic resection is recommended if ALL of the following criteria are met: 1
- Confined to mucosa
- Well-differentiated (G1-2)
- Non-ulcerated
- <2 cm in diameter
Endoscopic resection may be considered if no more than two expanded criteria are met (including larger size, superficial submucosal invasion, or presence of ulceration) 1
Localized Resectable Disease (Stage IB and above)
Surgical resection with perioperative chemotherapy is the standard of care: 1
Perioperative chemotherapy regimen: A triplet regimen including fluoropyrimidine, platinum compound, and docetaxel should be given when possible 1
Surgical resection:
- Subtotal gastrectomy may be performed if a macroscopic proximal margin of 3 cm can be achieved 1
- For diffuse/poorly cohesive subtypes, a margin of 5 cm is required 1
- Lymph node dissection: Minimum of 14 lymph nodes should be recovered, optimally at least 25 1
- For T1 tumors, D1+ lymphadenectomy (perigastric and local N2 nodes) may be sufficient 1
Stage IB Disease (Alternative Approach)
For patients who undergo surgery without preoperative chemotherapy: 1
- Adjuvant chemotherapy with a doublet regimen (fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin or docetaxel) for 6 months total duration is recommended 1
- However, perioperative approach is preferred as adjuvant chemotherapy is less well tolerated and neoadjuvant therapy allows tumor downsizing 1
Locally Advanced Disease (Stage III)
- Some patients may benefit from preoperative chemotherapy with potential for downstaging and improved resectability 1
- Therapy for incomplete resection (R1) remains palliative, though adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy might be considered individually 1
Metastatic Disease (Stage IV)
Palliative chemotherapy should be considered: 1
- Combination regimens incorporating cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil with or without anthracyclines 1
- ECF regimen (Epirubicin 50 mg/m², Cisplatin 60 mg/m², continuous infusion 5-FU 200 mg/m²/day) is among the most active and well-tolerated combinations 1
- Alternative regimens include oxaliplatin, irinotecan, docetaxel, and oral fluoropyrimidines 1
- HER2 testing should be performed on all gastric/EGJ adenocarcinomas to guide anti-HER2 targeted therapy 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never dismiss persistent dyspepsia as benign, especially in high-risk patients or those with alarm symptoms 2
- Always investigate iron-deficiency anemia thoroughly as it may be the only presenting sign of gastric cancer 1, 2
- Do not rely on plain CT scans for staging; contrast-enhanced multiplanar CT is essential 1
- Do not skip laparoscopy in potentially resectable cases being considered for perioperative chemotherapy, as it prevents futile laparotomy in patients with occult peritoneal disease 1
- Avoid inadequate lymph node harvest during surgery; minimum 14 nodes required for accurate staging 1
- Do not use adjuvant chemotherapy alone for MSI-H gastric cancers, as it cannot be recommended in this subgroup 1
Follow-Up
Symptom-driven visits are recommended rather than intensive routine surveillance, as there is no evidence that regular intensive follow-up improves outcomes 1