What are normal proBNP (pro-brain natriuretic peptide) values?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Normal NT-proBNP (Pro-BNP) Values

Normal NT-proBNP values to exclude chronic heart failure are <125 pg/mL, and to exclude acute heart failure are <300 pg/mL, though these thresholds must be adjusted based on age, sex, obesity, race, atrial fibrillation, and renal function. 1

Standard Reference Ranges for Excluding Heart Failure

For chronic heart failure exclusion:

  • NT-proBNP <125 pg/mL effectively rules out chronic heart failure 2, 1
  • BNP <35 pg/mL excludes chronic heart failure 2, 1

For acute heart failure exclusion:

  • NT-proBNP <300 pg/mL has 99% negative predictive value for acute heart failure 1, 3
  • BNP <100 pg/mL excludes acute heart failure 2

Age-Adjusted Reference Ranges

Age significantly affects NT-proBNP levels, requiring threshold adjustments in older adults 1:

Age-specific upper reference limits (97.5th percentile):

  • Age <50 years: NT-proBNP 0-450 pg/mL 3
  • Age 50-75 years: NT-proBNP 0-900 pg/mL 3
  • Age >75 years: NT-proBNP 0-1,800 pg/mL 2, 3

The median NT-proBNP in healthy adults aged 85+ is approximately 297-351 pg/mL, with upper reference values reaching 519-649 pg/mL in women and men respectively 4. Recent population-based studies show that 37-39% of apparently healthy older adults have NT-proBNP >125 pg/mL, indicating the standard cutoff performs poorly in this age group 5.

Critical Adjustments for Special Populations

Obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m²):

  • Lower thresholds by 20-30% for both NT-proBNP and BNP 2, 1
  • Obesity paradoxically decreases natriuretic peptide levels despite increased cardiovascular risk 2, 1

Black patients:

  • Lower thresholds by 20-30% to avoid false-negative results 2, 1
  • Black individuals typically have 20-30% lower baseline values 1

Atrial fibrillation:

  • Increase thresholds by 20-30% for both peptides 2, 1
  • Atrial fibrillation independently elevates natriuretic peptide levels 1

Elderly patients (>75 years):

  • Raise thresholds by 20-30% 2
  • Age-related decreases in left ventricular compliance and renal function elevate baseline levels 2

Chronic kidney disease:

  • For eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m², use NT-proBNP cutoff of 1,200 pg/mL instead of 300 pg/mL 2, 1
  • Exclude patients on renal replacement therapy from standard natriuretic peptide interpretation 2

Neprilysin inhibitor therapy (sacubitril/valsartan):

  • Use NT-proBNP only for monitoring; BNP measurements are unreliable due to neprilysin inhibition 2, 1
  • NT-proBNP requires no adjustment with these medications 2, 1

Sex Differences

Women have higher baseline NT-proBNP values than men across all age groups 5, 6:

  • At age <30 years: median 51 pg/mL in women vs 21 pg/mL in men 6
  • At age 50-59 years: median 66 pg/mL in women vs 38 pg/mL in men 6
  • 9.8% of young women (<30 years) have NT-proBNP ≥125 pg/mL compared to only 1.4% of young men 6

Common Pitfalls

The 125 pg/mL cutoff is inadequate for older adults: Population studies demonstrate that up to 39% of healthy individuals over 65 years have values exceeding this threshold, making it unsuitable for screening in elderly populations without age adjustment 5.

Obesity creates false reassurance: Obese patients may have "normal" NT-proBNP levels despite significant heart failure; clinicians must lower diagnostic thresholds by 20-30% in patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m² 2.

Renal dysfunction requires different interpretation: Standard cutoffs dramatically overdiagnose heart failure in patients with reduced eGFR; doubling the threshold to 1,200 pg/mL improves diagnostic accuracy 2, 1.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.