What is the diagnostic approach for pulmonary embolism?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnostic Approach for Pulmonary Embolism

Diagnose pulmonary embolism using a structured algorithmic approach that begins with clinical probability assessment (Wells score or gestalt), followed by D-dimer testing in low-risk patients, and CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) as the definitive imaging modality when indicated. 1

Step 1: Clinical Probability Assessment

Assess pre-test probability using either a validated prediction rule or clinical gestalt before ordering any diagnostic tests. 2, 1

Wells Score (Structured Approach)

The Wells score assigns points for specific clinical features to stratify patients into low, intermediate, or high probability categories 2:

  • Low risk (Wells <2): 3% PE prevalence 2
  • Intermediate risk (Wells 2-6): 13% PE prevalence 2
  • High risk (Wells >6): 36% PE prevalence 2

Clinical Gestalt (Experienced Clinician Assessment)

Gestalt assessment performs comparably to Wells score, with PE rates of 3%, 10%, and 33% in low (<15%), intermediate (15-40%), and high (>40%) probability groups respectively 2. Both approaches are validated and acceptable 2.

Key Clinical Features to Assess

Look for these specific predictors when calculating probability 2:

  • Symptoms: Sudden-onset dyspnea (strongest predictor), chest pain, syncope, hemoptysis
  • Risk factors: Immobilization, prior DVT, age >57 years, male sex
  • Signs: Unilateral leg swelling, tachycardia
  • ECG findings: Acute cor pulmonale pattern (S1Q3T3, right precordial T-wave inversions, right bundle branch block)
  • Negative predictors: Fever ≥38°C, wheezes, crackles, pre-existing cardiovascular or pulmonary disease

Critical caveat: Clinical features alone cannot definitively diagnose or exclude PE—objective testing is mandatory 3, 4.

Step 2: Apply PERC Rule (Low-Risk Patients Only)

For patients with low clinical probability, apply the 8-item Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria (PERC); if all criteria are met, no further testing is needed. 1

This step prevents unnecessary testing and radiation exposure in truly low-risk patients 1.

Step 3: D-Dimer Testing

Order D-dimer testing for low and intermediate probability patients who do not meet PERC criteria. 2, 1

  • D-dimer <500 ng/mL: Safely excludes PE without imaging 2, 1
  • D-dimer ≥500 ng/mL: Proceed to imaging 2, 1

Important limitation: D-dimer has minimal utility in hospitalized patients due to high false-positive rates from infection, cancer, inflammation, and postoperative states 2. In these patients, D-dimer rules out PE in less than 10% of cases 2.

Step 4: Imaging Studies

CT Pulmonary Angiography (First-Line)

CTPA is the preferred imaging modality when available and not contraindicated. 1

CTPA has replaced ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scanning as the primary diagnostic test in most centers due to superior visualization of pulmonary vasculature 1.

V/Q Scanning (Alternative)

Consider V/Q scanning in specific situations 2, 1:

  • Pregnancy (to reduce fetal radiation exposure if chest X-ray is normal) 1
  • Renal failure (to avoid contrast-induced nephropathy) 1
  • Contrast allergy

V/Q scan interpretation 2:

  • Normal perfusion scan: Excludes PE (no further testing needed) 2
  • High-probability scan with high clinical probability: Confirms PE 2
  • Non-diagnostic scan (most common result): Requires further testing with either lower extremity ultrasound or pulmonary angiography 2

The PIOPED study demonstrated that 16% of patients with "low probability" V/Q scans actually had PE, highlighting the limitations of this modality 2.

Step 5: Lower Extremity Venous Ultrasound

If imaging is non-diagnostic or unavailable, perform compression ultrasound of lower extremities to detect deep vein thrombosis. 2

  • Positive DVT: Treat as PE (70% of PE patients have proximal DVT) 2
  • Negative DVT: Does not exclude PE; proceed to pulmonary angiography if clinical suspicion remains high 2

Special Scenario: Suspected Massive PE (Hemodynamically Unstable)

For patients presenting with shock or hypotension, perform immediate bedside echocardiography as the initial test. 2, 1

Echocardiography Findings

Look for indirect signs of acute pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular overload 2, 1:

  • RV dilation
  • RV hypokinesis
  • Interventricular septal flattening
  • Tricuspid regurgitation

In highly unstable patients, thrombolytic therapy may be initiated based on compatible echocardiographic findings alone. 2 If the patient stabilizes, confirm diagnosis with CTPA, V/Q scan, or bedside transesophageal echocardiography 2.

Critical point: A normal lung scan or CTPA in a patient with shock should prompt immediate search for alternative diagnoses (cardiogenic shock, tamponade, aortic dissection) 2.

Diagnostic Algorithm Summary

For hemodynamically stable patients (non-massive PE) 2, 1:

  1. Assess clinical probability (36% of patients)
  2. If low probability: Apply PERC or check D-dimer
  3. If D-dimer <500: Stop (no PE)
  4. If D-dimer ≥500: Perform lower extremity ultrasound (64% of patients)
  5. If DVT present: Treat (11% of patients)
  6. If no DVT: Perform CTPA or V/Q scan (53% of patients)
  7. If normal scan: Stop (8% of patients)
  8. If high-probability scan: Treat (10% of patients)
  9. If non-diagnostic scan: Pulmonary angiography (11% of patients)

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Overdiagnosis risk: Increased use of CT imaging has led to detection of subsegmental PEs of unclear clinical significance, exposing patients to unnecessary anticoagulation risks, radiation, and contrast complications 1.

Underdiagnosis risk: Failure to follow evidence-based diagnostic strategies when withholding anticoagulation despite clinical suspicion results in increased VTE episodes and sudden death 2. The European Heart Journal found that 70% of fatal PEs were not suspected clinically before death 2.

Hospitalized patients: Do not rely on D-dimer in postoperative, infected, or cancer patients—proceed directly to imaging if clinical suspicion exists 2.

Pregnancy: Prioritize V/Q scanning over CTPA when chest X-ray is normal to minimize fetal radiation exposure 1.

References

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach for Pulmonary Embolism

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Pulmonary embolism: difficulties in the clinical diagnosis.

Seminars in respiratory infections, 1995

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.