What does a Qp/Qs (pulmonary to systemic blood flow ratio) of 3.7 in Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) mean?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

What Does a Qp/Qs of 3.7 in ASD Mean?

A Qp/Qs ratio of 3.7 in atrial septal defect indicates a very large left-to-right shunt with 3.7 times more blood flowing through the pulmonary circulation than the systemic circulation, which strongly warrants closure via transcatheter or surgical repair. 1

Clinical Significance of This Ratio

  • This ratio far exceeds the 1.5:1 threshold that defines a hemodynamically significant shunt requiring intervention. 1, 2

  • A Qp/Qs of 3.7 indicates severe volume overload of the right heart chambers, as the right ventricle is pumping nearly 4 times the normal volume with each beat. 1

  • This magnitude of shunting will cause right atrial and right ventricular enlargement, and the patient is at high risk for developing pulmonary vascular disease if left untreated. 1

Management Algorithm

Step 1: Assess for Pulmonary Hypertension and Pulmonary Vascular Resistance

Before proceeding with closure, you must exclude severe pulmonary hypertension and elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). 1

  • Measure pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) and calculate PVR, ideally via cardiac catheterization. 1

  • If PVR is less than one-third of systemic vascular resistance (SVR) AND PASP is less than 50% of systemic arterial systolic pressure, proceed with closure (Class I recommendation). 1

  • If PASP is 50% or more of systemic pressure OR PVR is greater than one-third of SVR, closure may still be considered but requires expert evaluation at an adult congenital heart disease center (Class IIb recommendation). 1

  • Do NOT close the ASD if PASP exceeds two-thirds of systemic pressure OR PVR exceeds two-thirds of SVR, as this indicates severe pulmonary vascular disease or Eisenmenger physiology (Class III: Harm). 1

Step 2: Evaluate Right Heart Size and Function

  • Confirm right atrial and right ventricular enlargement via echocardiography or cardiac MRI. 1

  • With a Qp/Qs of 3.7, right heart enlargement is virtually certain and supports the indication for closure. 1, 3

Step 3: Assess for Cyanosis

  • Check pulse oximetry at rest and during exercise to ensure there is no right-to-left shunting causing desaturation. 1

  • The presence of cyanosis or exercise desaturation would indicate elevated PVR and contraindicate closure. 1

Step 4: Determine Closure Method

  • For secundum ASD with favorable anatomy, transcatheter device closure is the preferred approach (Class I). 1

  • For primum ASD, sinus venosus defect, or coronary sinus defect, surgical repair is required (Class I). 1

Expected Outcomes After Closure

  • Functional capacity improves significantly after ASD closure, even in patients who consider themselves asymptomatic. 3

  • In a study of adults with mean Qp/Qs of 2.1, maximal oxygen uptake increased by 14-22% at 6 months post-closure, with improvement seen across all age groups and shunt sizes. 3

  • Right ventricular dimensions decrease significantly after closure. 3

  • With your patient's Qp/Qs of 3.7 (substantially higher than the study mean of 2.1), even greater hemodynamic benefit and symptom improvement can be expected. 3

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not rely on a single non-invasive method to calculate Qp/Qs, as Doppler echocardiography, radionuclide studies, and oximetry show poor inter-method agreement. 4

  • Cardiac MRI with phase-contrast imaging is now the non-invasive reference standard for measuring Qp/Qs and should be used when available. 2, 5

  • Never close an ASD based solely on Qp/Qs without assessing pulmonary vascular resistance, as patients with Eisenmenger physiology can have catastrophic outcomes if the "pop-off" valve is eliminated. 1

  • Patients may underestimate their symptoms; objective exercise testing often reveals functional impairment not apparent from history alone. 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Understanding the Qp/Qs Ratio in Congenital Heart Disease

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Cardiac Shunt Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.