Best Test to Confirm Osteomyelitis
MRI is the best test to confirm osteomyelitis, with the highest sensitivity (95.6%) and specificity (80.7-96%) among all imaging modalities, and a 100% negative predictive value for excluding the diagnosis. 1, 2
Diagnostic Algorithm
Step 1: Initial Radiographs
- Begin with plain radiographs to exclude alternative diagnoses (fracture, tumor, degenerative changes), identify foreign bodies, and detect soft-tissue gas 1, 3
- Radiographs have limited sensitivity (70.4%) for acute osteomyelitis but are essential for baseline evaluation 2
- Critical pitfall: Normal radiographs do NOT exclude osteomyelitis—proceed to MRI if clinical suspicion remains high 3
Step 2: MRI Without and With IV Contrast
- MRI is the definitive test showing decreased T1-weighted bone marrow signal and increased signal on fluid-sensitive sequences (T2-weighted fat-saturated, STIR) 1
- Noncontrast MRI alone has high sensitivity and specificity for peripheral osteomyelitis 1
- IV contrast improves evaluation of soft tissue infections and abscesses but does not improve diagnosis of bone infection itself 1
- MRI provides excellent anatomic detail, multiplanar imaging, and superior soft tissue resolution without ionizing radiation 1, 4
Step 3: Alternative Tests When MRI is Contraindicated
FDG-PET/CT (second-line option):
- High sensitivity (81-100%) and specificity (87-100%) for osteomyelitis detection 1
- Particularly useful for multifocal infection, hardware-associated infection, or when hematogenous spread is suspected 1
- Limitation: Cannot distinguish infection from inflammation in acute post-operative/post-traumatic settings until 3-4 months after surgery 1
Combined Nuclear Medicine Studies (third-line option):
- WBC scan combined with sulfur colloid scan achieves up to 90% accuracy 1
- Technetium-99m HMPAO WBC scintigraphy shows 87.3% sensitivity and 94.7% specificity 2
- Most useful with orthopedic hardware or altered bone marrow distribution 1
CT with IV Contrast (limited role):
- Generally insensitive for acute osteomyelitis 5
- Superior for detecting sequestra (dead bone), cortical destruction, and sinus tracts in chronic osteomyelitis 1, 5
- Better than MRI for identifying foreign bodies and soft-tissue gas 1
Special Clinical Scenarios
Chronic Osteomyelitis with Draining Sinus
- MRI remains superior for extent of involvement 1
- CT with contrast useful for detecting sequestra and cortical thickening 1, 5
- FDG-PET shows 91% accuracy in chronic osteomyelitis 1
Hardware-Associated Infection
- Combined WBC scan with sulfur colloid scan preferred over MRI due to metal artifact 1
- FDG-PET/CT shows 96% accuracy for infection with orthopedic hardware 1
- CT with contrast helps evaluate hardware complications and periprosthetic osteolysis 1, 5
Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis
- MRI diagnostic accuracy similar to overall results 2
- Cortical erosion and confluent T1-weighted signal are independent risk factors for osteomyelitis 6
Key Diagnostic Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not rely on radiographs alone—early osteomyelitis frequently has normal radiographs 3
- Avoid misinterpreting post-surgical/post-traumatic changes as infection on MRI, particularly within 3-4 months of surgery 1
- Three-phase bone scan has poor specificity (<50%) in the setting of recent surgery or trauma due to osseous remodeling 1
- Ultrasound has limited benefit for diagnosing osteomyelitis itself, though useful for detecting soft tissue abscesses and guiding aspiration 1