What is the treatment for uveitis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment of Uveitis

For noninfectious anterior uveitis, topical corticosteroids (prednisolone acetate 1% or dexamethasone) are first-line treatment, while moderate to severe intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis requires systemic immunosuppression with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) such as methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, cyclosporine, or tacrolimus, with biologic TNF inhibitors (adalimumab or infliximab) reserved for refractory cases. 1, 2

Initial Treatment Approach by Anatomical Location

Anterior Uveitis

  • Topical corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment, with prednisolone acetate 1% preferred over difluprednate 1
  • For cases requiring >1-2 drops daily of prednisolone acetate 1% for ≥3 months, add systemic immunosuppression rather than continuing topical therapy alone 1
  • Infectious causes (toxoplasmosis, herpes, tuberculosis, HIV) require systemic antimicrobial treatment with or without corticosteroids depending on severity 2

Intermediate, Posterior, and Panuveitis

  • Mild intermediate uveitis may be monitored without initial treatment 2
  • Moderate to severe disease requires systemic therapy due to high risk of sight-threatening complications including cystoid macular edema, glaucoma, and vision loss 2, 3
  • Systemic corticosteroids are indicated when topical therapy fails or with bilateral posterior involvement, especially macular edema and occlusive vasculitis 3

Systemic Immunosuppression Algorithm

First-Line Non-Biologic DMARDs (Grade B Recommendation)

The following agents have equivalent evidence (EL 2B) for noninfectious uveitis 1:

  • Methotrexate (subcutaneous preferred over oral for better efficacy) 1
  • Mycophenolate mofetil - achieved inflammation control in 70.9% (95% CI, 57.1%-83.5%) and demonstrated steroid-sparing effect 1, 2
  • Azathioprine 1
  • Cyclosporine 1
  • Tacrolimus 1

Key decision point: Choice among these agents should be based on patient history (e.g., hepatitis contraindication), underlying uveitis cause, cost, and convenience 1

When First-Line Therapy Fails

Before changing therapy, rule out: 1

  • Treatment nonadherence
  • Infectious causes
  • Masquerade syndromes (lymphoma, retinal degeneration) - occurs in up to 2.5% of cases

If inadequate response after appropriate trial:

  1. Dose escalation to maximum tolerated therapeutic dose may be considered first (Grade B) 1
  2. Switch to alternative DMARD or add additional agent (Grade A) 1

Second-Line Biologic Therapy

Indications for biologics:

  • Refractory to first-line DMARD therapy 1
  • Severe active disease with sight-threatening complications at presentation 1

Biologic agent selection:

  • Monoclonal antibody TNF inhibitors (adalimumab or infliximab) are preferred over etanercept (Grade A for avoiding etanercept) 1
  • Adalimumab extended time to treatment failure to 24 weeks vs 13 weeks with placebo and reduced treatment failure from 78.5% to 54.5% (P<.001) 2
  • Etanercept should NOT be used for uveitis based on meta-analysis evidence 1

For severe active disease with sight-threatening complications: Start methotrexate AND monoclonal antibody TNF inhibitor immediately rather than methotrexate monotherapy 1

Third-Line Options for Refractory Disease

If inadequate response to first monoclonal antibody TNF inhibitor:

  1. Escalate dose and/or frequency above standard before switching 1
  2. If failed at above-standard dosing, switch to another monoclonal antibody TNF inhibitor 1

If failed methotrexate and 2 monoclonal antibody TNF inhibitors:

  • Biologic options: Abatacept or tocilizumab 1
  • Non-biologic alternatives: Mycophenolate, leflunomide, or cyclosporine 1

Monitoring and Adjustment Criteria

Parameters indicating need to adjust therapy (Grade B/C): 1

  • Deterioration in visual acuity
  • Increased anterior chamber cells or flare
  • Worsening vitreous haze
  • New or worsening chorioretinal lesions
  • Retinal vascular lesions
  • Macular or optic nerve involvement

Monitoring frequency:

  • On stable therapy: every 3 months minimum 1
  • When changing topical corticosteroids: within 1 month 1
  • When tapering/changing systemic therapy: within 2 months 1

Special Considerations

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-Associated Uveitis

  • Systemic immunosuppression recommended if poor prognostic factors present at first visit or if remission not achieved within 3 months 1
  • Methotrexate is first choice 1
  • For severe active disease, combine methotrexate with monoclonal antibody TNF inhibitor immediately 1

Sarcoid Uveitis

  • Local, intravitreal, or systemic steroids based on severity 4
  • Methotrexate, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil for steroid-refractory cases 3
  • Infliximab and adalimumab for refractory or sight-threatening disease 3

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not use etanercept for uveitis treatment - it lacks efficacy compared to monoclonal antibody TNF inhibitors 1
  • Do not continue topical corticosteroids alone if requiring >1-2 drops daily for >3 months - add systemic therapy to prevent complications like cataracts and glaucoma 1
  • Do not switch systemic therapy without first ruling out nonadherence, infection, and masquerade syndromes 1
  • Do not delay systemic therapy in moderate to severe posterior or panuveitis - these carry high risk of irreversible structural damage 1, 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Sarcoidosis and uveitis.

Autoimmunity reviews, 2014

Research

Sarcoid Uveitis: An Intriguing Challenger.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2022

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.