What medication can decrease the risk of acute pancreatitis post Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Rectal NSAIDs for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis Prevention

Administer 100 mg of rectal indomethacin or diclofenac immediately before or after ERCP to all patients without contraindications to NSAIDs. This is the single most effective pharmacologic intervention to reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) and should be considered standard of care 1.

Medication and Dosing

  • Rectal indomethacin 100 mg or rectal diclofenac 100 mg are the recommended agents, administered as a suppository 1, 2.
  • The rectal route is essential because it bypasses first-pass hepatic metabolism, provides higher bioavailability, and allows administration to fasting patients or those who may develop post-procedure nausea 2.
  • Timing is critical: administer the suppository either immediately before the procedure begins or immediately after it concludes 2.

Evidence Supporting Universal Use

The British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) strongly recommend rectal NSAIDs for all patients undergoing ERCP, regardless of baseline risk level 1, 2. This recommendation is based on high-quality randomized controlled trials demonstrating:

  • Significant reduction in PEP incidence: In high-risk patients, rectal indomethacin reduced PEP from 16.9% to 9.2% (P=0.005) 3.
  • Reduction in severity: Moderate-to-severe pancreatitis decreased from 8.8% to 4.4% (P=0.03) in the indomethacin group 3.
  • Benefit across risk categories: A large retrospective study of 4,017 patients showed rectal indomethacin reduced PEP odds by 65% (OR 0.35,95% CI 0.24-0.51) and moderate-to-severe PEP by 83% (OR 0.17,95% CI 0.09-0.32) 4.
  • Effectiveness in low-risk patients: Even in patients with malignant biliary obstruction (traditionally considered lower risk), rectal indomethacin reduced PEP by 64% 4.

Contraindications to Screen For

Before administering rectal NSAIDs, screen for the following absolute contraindications 2:

  • NSAID allergy or hypersensitivity
  • Significant renal impairment (acute kidney injury or severe chronic kidney disease)
  • Active peptic ulcer disease or recent gastrointestinal bleeding
  • Bleeding disorders or severe coagulopathy

High-Risk Patients: Combination Strategies

For patients at particularly high risk (young age, female sex, suspected Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, repeated pancreatic duct cannulation), consider combining rectal indomethacin with prophylactic pancreatic stent placement 1, 2. However, the additive benefit of stenting when NSAIDs are universally used remains uncertain 1.

One study demonstrated that combining rectal indomethacin with sublingual nitrates (5 mg) further reduced PEP from 15.3% to 6.7% (P=0.016) compared to indomethacin alone, though this requires confirmation in multicenter trials 5.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Forgetting to administer at the optimal time: The suppository must be given immediately before or after ERCP, not hours later 2.
  • Failing to screen for contraindications: Always check for NSAID allergies, renal function, and bleeding risk before administration 2.
  • Assuming low-risk patients don't benefit: Evidence shows benefit across all risk categories, including patients with malignant obstruction 4.
  • Relying solely on stenting in high-risk patients: NSAIDs should be the foundation, with stenting as an adjunct in select cases 1.

Nuance in the Evidence

One retrospective study of 524 unselected patients found no significant benefit of rectal indomethacin (4.33% vs 4.04% PEP rate, p=0.56) 6. However, this contradicts multiple higher-quality randomized trials and large cohort studies, and the guideline recommendations remain unchanged based on the preponderance of evidence favoring universal use 1, 2, 3, 4.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.