What is the purpose and interpretation of the VDRL (Venereal Disease Research Laboratory) test in diagnosing syphilis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

VDRL Test: Purpose and Interpretation in Syphilis Diagnosis

Primary Purpose

The VDRL (Venereal Disease Research Laboratory) test is a nontreponemal antibody test used to screen for syphilis and monitor treatment response, but it must always be combined with treponemal testing for complete diagnosis. 1

Key Performance Characteristics

Sensitivity by Stage

  • Primary syphilis: 71-73% sensitive, missing approximately 27-29% of early infections 2, 3
  • Secondary syphilis: 97-100% sensitive, detecting nearly all cases 4
  • Early latent syphilis: 80-100% sensitive 2
  • Late latent/tertiary syphilis: 47-76% sensitive, with significantly reduced detection 5, 6

Specificity Considerations

  • High specificity (93-100%) in healthy populations 7
  • Biological false-positives (BFP) occur in 0.24-0.92% of all tested patients, with higher rates in elderly patients, those with chronic illness, and HIV-positive individuals (2.1% BFP rate) 8
  • BFP reactions comprise 26% of all VDRL-positive results in low-prevalence populations 8
  • BFP titers are typically low (≤1:8) 7

Diagnostic Algorithm

Initial Testing Strategy

  • Both nontreponemal (VDRL or RPR) and treponemal tests must be performed, as using only one test type is insufficient for accurate diagnosis 1
  • For suspected primary syphilis with lesions present, darkfield microscopy or direct fluorescent antibody testing should be prioritized as the definitive diagnostic method 1, 4
  • Any positive VDRL must be confirmed with a treponemal test (FTA-ABS, TP-PA, or TPHA) to distinguish true positives from biological false-positives 9

Quantitative Reporting

  • VDRL results must be reported quantitatively with titers (e.g., 1:4,1:8,1:16) to enable treatment monitoring 1
  • A fourfold change in titer (two dilutions) represents clinically significant change in disease activity or treatment response 1

Monitoring Treatment Response

Follow-Up Testing

  • Sequential tests should use the same method (VDRL or RPR, not mixed) and preferably the same laboratory 1, 5
  • For early syphilis: Monitor at 3,6,9,12, and 24 months after treatment 5
  • For late latent syphilis: Monitor at 3,6,12,18, and 24 months after treatment 5

Expected Response

  • Successful treatment produces a fourfold decline in titer within 6-12 months for early syphilis and 12-24 months for late syphilis 5
  • 15-25% of patients treated during primary syphilis may become serologically nonreactive after 2-3 years 1, 5
  • Many patients remain "serofast" with persistent low titers (<1:8) for life, which does not indicate treatment failure 5

Special Clinical Scenarios

Neurosyphilis Diagnosis

  • CSF VDRL is 49-87% sensitive and 74-100% specific for neurosyphilis, making it highly specific but insensitive 7
  • A reactive CSF VDRL is diagnostic for neurosyphilis, but a negative result does not exclude it 7
  • CSF examination should be performed for patients with neurologic/ocular symptoms, late latent syphilis, or serologic treatment failure 7

Ocular and Otic Syphilis

  • CSF VDRL sensitivity is <50% in ocular syphilis and <10% in otic syphilis, requiring clinical diagnosis based on symptoms plus reactive serum serology 7

HIV-Infected Patients

  • Standard serologic tests remain accurate in most HIV-infected patients, though some may have atypical results 7, 1
  • Screen HIV-infected patients at least annually, with more frequent screening (every 3-6 months) for high-risk individuals 7
  • Consider CSF examination for HIV patients with serum RPR >1:32 or CD4 <350 cells/mm³ 7

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Testing Errors

  • Never use VDRL alone as a screening test without treponemal confirmation, as 26% of positive results may be false-positives 8
  • Never compare titers between different test types (VDRL vs. RPR), as they are not directly comparable 1, 5
  • Never rely on treponemal tests to assess treatment response, as they remain positive for life regardless of treatment 1

Interpretation Errors

  • Do not assume persistent low-titer reactivity indicates treatment failure or reinfection without a fourfold increase from baseline 5
  • Do not exclude late syphilis based on negative VDRL alone, as sensitivity drops to 47-76% in late-stage disease 5, 6
  • Prozone reactions causing false-negatives are rare (<0.85%) but more common in secondary syphilis, neurosyphilis, and pregnancy 7

Clinical Management Errors

  • Always test all syphilis patients for HIV infection 5
  • Always evaluate sexual contacts and treat if necessary 5
  • For reactive treponemal test with non-reactive VDRL/RPR, treat as late latent syphilis (benzathine penicillin G 2.4 million units IM weekly × 3 weeks) unless adequate prior treatment is documented 1, 6

References

Guideline

Syphilis Diagnosis Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Reactive FTA-ABS with Non-Reactive RPR

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

The asymptomatic patient with a positive VDRL test.

American family physician, 1988

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.