What is the procedure for performing a sensory examination on the leg?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

How to Perform a Sensory Examination of the Leg

A sensory examination of the leg should be performed using a 10-g Semmes-Weinstein monofilament for pressure sensation and a 128-Hz tuning fork for vibration testing, conducted in a quiet setting with the patient unable to see where testing occurs. 1

Preparation and Setting

  • Conduct the examination in a quiet and relaxed environment to minimize distractions and ensure accurate patient responses 1
  • First demonstrate the sensation on the patient's hands, wrists, elbows, or forehead so they understand what to expect before testing the legs 1
  • The patient must not be able to see where or whether you are applying the testing instrument during the actual examination 1

Monofilament Testing (Pressure Sensation)

Testing Technique

  • Use a 10-g (5.07 Semmes-Weinstein) monofilament for assessing protective sensation 1
  • Apply the monofilament perpendicular to the skin surface 1
  • Apply sufficient force to cause the filament to bend or buckle 1
  • The total duration of approach, skin contact, and removal should be approximately 2 seconds 1
  • Do not allow the filament to slide across the skin or make repetitive contact at the test site 1

Testing Sites on the Foot

  • Test three sites on both feet: typically the plantar surface of the first toe, third metatarsal head, and fifth metatarsal head 1
  • Apply the filament along the perimeter of, not on, any ulcer site, callus, scar, or necrotic tissue 1

Scoring Method

  • At each site, ask the patient two questions: (1) whether they feel the pressure applied ('yes'/'no'), and (2) where they feel the pressure ('left foot'/'right foot') 1
  • Repeat the application twice at the same site, but alternate with at least one 'mock' application where no filament is applied (total of three questions per site) 1
  • Protective sensation is present if the patient correctly answers 2 out of 3 applications at each site 1
  • Protective sensation is absent with 2 out of 3 incorrect answers, indicating the patient is at risk for ulceration 1

Important Caveats

  • Be aware that monofilaments lose their buckling force with extended use, which can affect test reliability 1
  • Provide positive feedback and encouragement to the patient during testing 1

Tuning Fork Testing (Vibration Sensation)

Testing Technique

  • Use a 128-Hz tuning fork for vibration testing 1
  • First demonstrate on the patient's wrists, elbows, or clavicle so they know what to expect 1
  • Apply the tuning fork on a bony part on the dorsal side of the distal phalanx of the first toe 1
  • The tuning fork should be applied perpendicularly with constant pressure 1

Scoring Method

  • Repeat the application twice, but alternate with at least one 'mock' application where the tuning fork is not vibrating 1
  • The test is positive (normal) if the patient correctly answers at least 2 out of 3 applications 1
  • The test is negative (abnormal) with 2 out of 3 incorrect answers, indicating the patient is at risk for ulceration 1

Proximal Testing if Needed

  • If the patient cannot sense vibrations on the big toe, repeat the test more proximally at the malleolus and tibial tuberosity 1

Additional Sensory Modalities

  • Cotton wisp testing can also be used to assess light touch sensation 1
  • For comprehensive evaluation in research settings, pinprick testing for pain sensation and temperature testing may be included 2, 3
  • The combination of pinprick and light touch is adequate for diagnostic purposes in patients with radicular pain 3

Clinical Interpretation

  • The monofilament test specifically assesses large fiber function and protective sensation; it does not evaluate small fiber neuropathy (pain, temperature) which may be present even with normal monofilament testing 4
  • Abnormal findings indicate loss of protective sensation (LOPS), the primary risk factor for diabetic foot ulceration 4
  • Patients with intact sensation across all tested sites do not have clinically significant distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy affecting protective sensation at the time of testing 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Quantitative sensory testing: a comprehensive protocol for clinical trials.

European journal of pain (London, England), 2006

Guideline

Intact Monofilament Sensation: Clinical Implications and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.