What is the difference between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Differences Between Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma Based on NCCN Guidelines

Adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma are fundamentally different disease entities that require distinct diagnostic approaches, treatment strategies, and prognostic considerations according to NCCN guidelines, with the most critical distinction being that squamous cell carcinoma can be treated definitively with chemoradiation alone while adenocarcinoma requires surgical resection whenever feasible. 1

Anatomic and Histologic Distinctions

Anal Cancer Context

  • Most primary cancers of the anal canal are squamous cell carcinomas, with the NCCN guidelines consolidating all squamous variants (keratinizing, non-keratinizing, basaloid, cloacogenic) under a single generic heading of "squamous cell carcinoma" because they share similar natural history and prognosis 2

  • Adenocarcinomas in the anal region are less common tumors that arise from rectal mucosa or anal glands and are specifically excluded from the primary anal carcinoma treatment guidelines 2

  • Perianal squamous cell carcinomas are more likely to be well-differentiated and keratinizing compared to anal canal tumors, with skin appendages (hair follicles, sweat glands) helping distinguish them 2

Esophageal Cancer Context

  • Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma represent two distinct diseases with different pathogenesis, epidemiology, tumor biology, and prognosis that should be analyzed and reported separately 3

  • Squamous cell carcinoma patients are typically 10 years younger, associated with lower socioeconomic status, tobacco and alcohol abuse, and have contact with the tracheal-bronchial tree in 75% of cases 3

  • Adenocarcinoma patients are older, associated with higher socioeconomic status and cardiovascular risk factors, with 94% of tumors located below the tracheal bifurcation 3

Treatment Strategy Differences

Esophageal Cancer Management

The most critical treatment distinction is that squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus can be treated definitively with chemoradiation without surgery in selected cases, while adenocarcinoma requires surgical resection whenever reasonable. 1

  • For locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma, preoperative induction therapy consists of combined chemoradiotherapy 3

  • For adenocarcinoma (AEG I), preoperative induction therapy consists of chemotherapy alone 3

  • Squamous cell carcinoma frequently requires subtotal esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis due to proximal location, while adenocarcinoma allows classic Ivor-Lewis procedure with intrathoracic anastomosis 3

  • Adenosquamous carcinoma should be managed more like adenocarcinoma because complete response to chemoradiation is only 20% (unlike squamous cell carcinoma where chemoradiation is acceptable definitive therapy) 4

Lung Cancer Management

All patients with adenocarcinoma must undergo molecular testing for EGFR mutations and ALK gene rearrangements before initiating systemic therapy, as targeted therapies are highly effective for specific mutations 1

  • Additional molecular testing for ROS1, BRAF, MET, and RET should be performed for adenocarcinomas, as these mutations guide targeted therapy selection 1

  • Squamous cell carcinomas have greater risk of life-threatening hemorrhage with bevacizumab and must avoid this agent 1

  • For adenocarcinomas without targetable mutations, platinum-based chemotherapy combined with pemetrexed is preferred 1

  • For squamous cell carcinomas, platinum-based chemotherapy with agents other than pemetrexed (gemcitabine or taxanes) is recommended 1

Occult Primary Tumors

  • When histology is unknown, different chemotherapy regimens are specified based on whether the tumor is adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma 2

  • For adenocarcinoma: paclitaxel/carboplatin, paclitaxel/carboplatin/etoposide, docetaxel/carboplatin, or gemcitabine-based regimens 2

  • For squamous cell carcinoma: paclitaxel/cisplatin/5-FU or docetaxel/cisplatin/5-FU 2

Diagnostic and Immunohistochemical Distinctions

Immunohistochemical Panels

A minimal panel of p40 and TTF-1 effectively distinguishes squamous cell carcinoma from adenocarcinoma in small biopsy samples. 1, 5

  • Adenocarcinomas are typically TTF-1-positive, napsin A-positive, and p40-negative 1

  • Squamous cell carcinomas are p40-positive, p63-positive, CK5/6-positive, and TTF-1-negative 1, 5

  • CK5/6 shows 84% sensitivity for poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinomas 5

  • p40 (DNp63) has superior sensitivity and specificity approaching 100% for squamous differentiation compared to p63 5

Cervical Cancer Context

  • NCCN guidelines for cervical cancer address squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, and adenocarcinoma together, though adenocarcinoma in situ is harder to sample via cervical cytology because it affects the endocervical canal 2

Prognostic Differences

Esophageal Cancer Outcomes

  • Squamous cell carcinoma shows earlier lymphatic spread and worse prognosis compared to adenocarcinoma 3

  • However, 5-year survival rates after R0 resection are similar (46% for squamous cell carcinoma vs 45% for adenocarcinoma) 6

  • Adenocarcinoma patients with pT1, pN0, or stage I tumors have significant survival advantage over squamous cell carcinoma (p < 0.050) 6

  • Adenocarcinoma has higher diffuse recurrence rate, while squamous cell carcinoma has higher incidence of tobacco-related second primary tumors 6

  • The two entities have different independent prognostic factors 6

Lung Cancer Outcomes

  • Pulmonary adenocarcinoma diagnosed by morphology has better prognosis than "NSCLC favor adenocarcinoma" (diagnosed by immunohistochemistry alone) in patients treated with platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy 7

  • Lack of adenocarcinoma morphology is associated with worse prognosis and shorter overall survival in multivariate analysis 7

Critical Clinical Pitfalls

Never use general NSCLC categories when specific histology can be determined, as this prevents optimal treatment selection 1

Never initiate systemic therapy for adenocarcinoma without completing molecular testing, as this misses opportunities for highly effective targeted therapy 1

Never use bevacizumab in squamous cell carcinoma due to hemorrhage risk 1

Never assume adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma respond equivalently to the same treatment regimens—they require histology-specific approaches 1

Never treat adenosquamous carcinoma like squamous cell carcinoma with definitive chemoradiation alone—it behaves more like adenocarcinoma and requires surgical resection 4

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.