What are the risks of DaVinci Robotic-assisted Total Hysterectomy with Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy for a relatively healthy 61-year-old female?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Risks of DaVinci Robotic-Assisted Total Hysterectomy with Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy

For a relatively healthy 61-year-old woman at 139 lbs, robotic-assisted total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is a safe and feasible procedure with low complication rates, but the primary risks include surgical complications (2-12% overall, with severe complications in 2-4% of cases) and the long-term health consequences of surgical menopause if she is not already postmenopausal. 1, 2

Immediate Surgical Risks

Intraoperative Complications

  • Organ injury risk is low but present, including potential injury to the bladder, ureters, or bowel, though robotic surgery has demonstrated safe outcomes even in complicated cases 3
  • Bleeding requiring transfusion is uncommon, with studies showing no intraoperative blood transfusions in matched cohorts 1
  • Conversion to laparotomy occurs in approximately 5.7% of cases, though this rate varies by surgical complexity 4

Perioperative Complications

  • Overall 90-day complication rates range from 8-12% in contemporary robotic surgery series 1
  • Severe (grade 3 or higher) complications occur in 2-4% of patients undergoing robotic-assisted staging procedures 1
  • Hospital stay is typically short, with many patients discharged on postoperative day 1, indicating rapid recovery 5

Long-Term Health Risks Related to Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy

If She Is Premenopausal or Early Postmenopausal (Critical Consideration)

At age 61, if this patient underwent natural menopause recently or is perimenopausal, removing her ovaries carries significant long-term health risks:

  • Increased cardiovascular disease risk from premature estrogen deprivation 2, 6
  • Accelerated bone loss and osteoporosis risk if performed before adequate bone density is established 6, 7
  • Cognitive dysfunction risk associated with early surgical menopause 2, 6
  • Increased all-cause mortality when oophorectomy is performed unnecessarily before natural menopause 2

Mitigation Strategy for Oophorectomy Risks

  • Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) should be initiated immediately after surgery if she is not already well past menopause, and continued until at least age 51 (average age of natural menopause) 6
  • Estrogen-only HRT is appropriate since she will have undergone hysterectomy, which has a more favorable safety profile than combined therapy 6
  • HRT minimizes long-term consequences including cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, cognitive dysfunction, and early mortality 6

Patient-Specific Considerations

Weight and BMI Advantage

  • At 139 lbs, this patient is not obese, which reduces surgical complexity and complication risk compared to morbidly obese patients 5
  • Robotic surgery has proven particularly advantageous in patients with higher BMI, but her normal weight makes the procedure even more straightforward 5

Age-Related Factors

  • At 61 years old, she is likely postmenopausal, which means the hormonal consequences of oophorectomy may be less severe than in younger women 2
  • However, if she is recently postmenopausal (within 10 years), HRT should still be strongly considered to prevent the accelerated health risks mentioned above 6

Surgical Approach Benefits

Robotic vs. Traditional Surgery

  • Minimally invasive robotic approach reduces morbidity and hospitalization time compared to open surgery 2, 3
  • Operative times are reasonable, with median skin-to-skin times of 115-120 minutes for complete staging procedures 1
  • Blood loss is minimal in robotic-assisted procedures 1, 4
  • Recovery is rapid, with most patients experiencing uncomplicated postoperative courses 5, 4

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume oophorectomy is risk-free at age 61 - assess her menopausal status carefully and consider whether bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is medically necessary for her indication 2
  • If oophorectomy is performed and she is within 10 years of menopause, failing to prescribe HRT is a significant missed opportunity to prevent long-term morbidity 6
  • Ensure the surgical indication justifies removing both ovaries - if this is for benign disease without high-risk genetic mutations, consider whether ovarian preservation might be appropriate 2

Summary of Risk Profile

The robotic surgical procedure itself carries low risk (2-4% severe complications), but the decision to remove both ovaries at age 61 requires careful consideration of her menopausal status and whether HRT will be initiated postoperatively to mitigate long-term health consequences. 1, 6

References

Research

Robotic-assisted single-port and multi-port surgical staging in early-stage endometrial cancer: a propensity matched comparison.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Overcoming extreme obesity with robotic surgery.

The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS, 2010

Guideline

Safety of Hormone Replacement Therapy for Premature Surgical Menopause

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Strategies to Optimize Bone and Cardiovascular Health in BRCA Carriers After Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.