What is the recommended approach for assessing the mitral valve using an echocardiogram (echo-cardiogram)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 14, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Echocardiographic Assessment of the Mitral Valve

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the first-line imaging modality for comprehensive mitral valve assessment, with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) reserved for cases of suspected or confirmed dysfunction, inadequate TTE imaging quality, or when detailed pre-operative planning is required. 1

Initial Imaging Approach

Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)

  • Begin with 2D TTE using multiple standardized views to evaluate all components of the mitral valve apparatus, including the annulus, leaflets, chordae tendineae, papillary muscles, and left ventricular attachments 1, 2
  • Essential TTE views include:
    • Parasternal long-axis view (visualizes A2 and P2 scallops; used to diagnose prolapse and measure annular dimensions) 1
    • Parasternal short-axis view (assesses all six scallops and localizes regurgitant jet origin) 1
    • Apical four-chamber view (visualizes A3, A2, and P1 scallops from internal to external) 1
    • Apical two-chamber view (displays P3, A2, and P1 in bi-commissural orientation) 1
    • Multiple off-axis cuts to scan the entire sewing ring and subvalvular apparatus 1

Critical Pitfall in 2D Imaging

  • Never diagnose mitral valve prolapse from the apical four-chamber view alone, as the saddle-shaped annulus creates false-positive findings; always confirm prolapse in the parasternal long-axis or apical long-axis views 1

Comprehensive Assessment Components

Valve Morphology

  • Document leaflet structure including the six individual scallops (A1, A2, A3 for anterior leaflet; P1, P2, P3 for posterior leaflet from left to right) 1
  • Identify specific pathology:
    • Flail leaflet, ruptured papillary muscle, or large coaptation defect (specific for severe mitral regurgitation) 1
    • Leaflet thickening, calcification, or prolapse 1
    • Chordal rupture with visualization from left atrial views or longitudinal cut planes 1
  • Measure annular dimensions using parasternal long-axis view; annular dilatation is present when the annulus/anterior leaflet ratio is ≥1.32 1

Functional Assessment

  • Evaluate leaflet motion using Carpentier's classification to determine mechanism of regurgitation 2
  • Assess coaptation by checking for visible leaks at the coaptation line, which has an upward concavity in the closed position 1
  • Measure normal annular contraction, which should show a 25% decrease in annular area during systole 1

Quantitative Parameters for Regurgitation

  • Use color Doppler imaging as the primary screening tool, recognizing that jet size depends on technical factors, hemodynamics, LA pressure, and jet direction (eccentric vs. central) 1
  • Apply semi-quantitative measures:
    • Vena contracta width (severe if >6 mm) 1
    • Pressure half-time 1
    • Circumferential extent of paravalvular regurgitation (severe if ≥30%) 1
  • Calculate quantitative parameters:
    • Effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA; severe if ≥30 mm²) 1
    • Regurgitant volume (severe if ≥60 mL) 1
    • Regurgitant fraction (severe if >50%) 1

Associated Cardiac Parameters

  • Document left ventricular size and function to assess impact of regurgitation and guide timing of intervention 1
  • Measure left atrial size as a marker of chronicity and hemodynamic burden 1
  • Estimate pulmonary artery pressure to evaluate secondary effects of mitral valve disease 1

When to Advance to 3D Echocardiography

3D TTE or TEE Indications

  • Use 3D imaging when available for superior visualization of mitral valve morphology, particularly for anterior leaflet defects, commissural involvement, and complex pathology 1
  • 3D provides the "en face" surgical view from the atrial perspective, identical to what surgeons see in the operating room 1
  • 3D is superior to 2D for assessing the saddle-shaped annulus, which cannot be adequately appreciated with mental reconstruction from 2D views 1
  • Display orientation: Always orient the mitral valve with the aortic valve at the 12 o'clock position, regardless of whether viewing from the left atrial or left ventricular perspective 1

3D Advantages for Specific Assessments

  • Precise localization of prolapsing segments and anatomic lesions using leaflet segmentation 1
  • Quantification of annular geometry, including size, shape, and degree of non-planarity using commercial software 1
  • Evaluation of subvalvular apparatus with en face views from the LV perspective showing chordal insertions 1

Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE)

Specific Indications for TEE

  • Proceed to TEE when:
    • TTE image quality is suboptimal or inconclusive 1, 3
    • Suspected or confirmed mitral valve dysfunction requiring detailed assessment 1
    • Pre-operative planning for mitral valve repair or replacement 4, 5, 6
    • Intra-procedural guidance for transcatheter interventions 1

TEE Examination Protocol

  • Systematic six-view examination improves identification of mitral segments and precise localization of pathology (96% accuracy vs. 70% with non-systematic approach, p<0.001) 7
  • Standard TEE views include:
    • Mid-esophageal five-chamber view 7
    • Mid-esophageal four-chamber view 7
    • Mid-esophageal two-chamber views (anterior, mid, posterior) 7
    • Transgastric short-axis view at 0° (permits assessment of all six scallops) 1
    • Mid-esophageal long-axis view at 120° (shows A2 and P2) 1

TEE vs. TTE Accuracy

  • In experienced hands, TTE predicts valve repairability with 97% accuracy, with TEE adding significant information in only rare cases 5
  • For degenerative mitral regurgitation, TTE shows 91% agreement with surgical findings for localizing prolapsed segments (kappa 0.81) vs. 93% for TEE (kappa 0.85), without significant incremental value (p=0.40) 5
  • However, intraoperative TEE remains essential even when pre-operative TTE is comprehensive 5

Pre-Operative Risk Stratification

Predictors of Unsuccessful Repair

  • Primary mitral regurgitation unfavorable features:

    • Large central regurgitant jet 1
    • Severe annular dilatation (>50 mm) 1
    • Involvement of ≥3 scallops, especially with anterior leaflet involvement 1
    • Extensive valve calcification 1
    • Lack of valve tissue (rheumatic disease or endocarditis with large perforation) 1
  • Secondary ischemic mitral regurgitation unfavorable features:

    • Mitral diastolic annulus diameter ≥37 mm 1
    • Systolic tenting area ≥1.6 cm² 1
    • Severe functional ischemic mitral regurgitation 1

Prognostic Implications

  • Single prolapse of the middle posterior scallop (P2) predicts better postoperative outcome compared to non-P2 lesions (p=0.008) 5
  • Mitral replacement predicted by TTE is an independent predictor of long-term postoperative mortality (odds ratio 5.7,95% CI 1.97-16.4, p=0.001) 5

Alternative Imaging Modalities

Cardiac MRI

  • Consider cardiac MRI when:
    • Echocardiography is inconclusive or provides discrepant results after eliminating technical errors 1
    • Detailed assessment of valve morphology and function is needed with superior multiplanar capacity 3
    • Accurate quantification of mitral regurgitation is required (MRI shows better correlation with post-surgical LV remodeling: r=0.85, p<0.0001 vs. echo r=0.32, p=0.1) 3
    • Evaluating complex congenital anomalies like double-orifice mitral valve without radiation exposure 3

Cardiac CT and Cinefluoroscopy

  • Reserve CT or cinefluoroscopy for cases where leaflet/disc motion is unclear on TTE in prosthetic valves, or when MRI is contraindicated 1
  • Avoid CT in young patients with congenital anomalies requiring repeated examinations due to radiation exposure 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Mitral Valve Apparatus Anatomy and Function

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Cardiac MRI for Double-Orifice Mitral Valve Evaluation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

A framework for systematic characterization of the mitral valve by real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography.

Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography, 2009

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.