What are the treatments for prostate cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Prostate Cancer Treatment Overview

Treatment for prostate cancer depends on disease stage and risk stratification, with options ranging from active surveillance for low-risk disease to combination systemic therapy for metastatic disease, prioritizing mortality reduction and quality of life preservation.

Risk-Stratified Treatment Approach

Low-Risk Localized Disease (T1-2a, Gleason ≤6, PSA <10 ng/mL)

Active surveillance is the preferred management strategy for low-risk prostate cancer rather than immediate intervention 1. This approach achieves 99% disease-specific survival at 8 years while avoiding treatment-related morbidity 2.

Monitoring protocol includes:

  • PSA measurement every 6 months 1
  • Digital rectal examination every 12 months 1
  • Repeat prostate biopsy every 12 months 1
  • First follow-up at 3 months to establish baseline 1

Intervention triggers:

  • Gleason score upgrade to ≥7 on repeat biopsy 1
  • PSA velocity >2.0 ng/mL/year 1
  • Increased tumor volume (>3 cores positive or >50% involvement per core) 1

Low-Risk Treatment Options (When Intervention Required)

For patients requiring treatment, radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy (minimum 70 Gy in 2.0 Gy fractions), and brachytherapy achieve similar long-term survival outcomes 2, 1. The 10-year survival rate is 90-94% with all treatment modalities 2.

Key treatment considerations:

  • External beam radiotherapy should use conformal techniques with minimum target dose of 70 Gy 2
  • Brachytherapy with permanent implants results in similar survival to radical prostatectomy with less chronic urinary symptoms and erectile dysfunction 2
  • Radical prostatectomy significantly reduced disease-specific mortality (4.6% vs. 8.9% at median 6.2 years follow-up) compared to watchful waiting, though no difference in overall survival was observed 2

Intermediate and High-Risk Localized Disease (T2-T4)

Androgen suppression combined with external beam radiotherapy significantly improves local control, reduces disease progression, and improves overall survival 2.

Treatment protocol:

  • Neoadjuvant LHRH agonist therapy for 4-6 months before radiotherapy 2
  • Adjuvant hormonal therapy for minimum 6 months, ideally 2-3 years 2
  • External beam radiotherapy with target dose ≥66 Gy in 1.8-2.0 Gy fractions over 6-7 weeks 2

Preventive measure: Breast irradiation (8-15 Gy in 1-3 fractions) should be given 1-2 weeks before antiandrogen therapy to prevent painful gynecomastia 2.

Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

First-line treatment is triplet therapy combining ADT + docetaxel + darolutamide, which provides significant overall survival benefit (23.0 months OS gain, HR: 0.68) 3.

Alternative first-line regimens:

  • ADT + docetaxel + abiraterone + prednisone for fit men with de novo metastatic disease, especially those with multiple bone metastases or visceral metastases 3
  • ADT + novel hormone agents (abiraterone + prednisone, apalutamide, or enzalutamide) 3

Standard hormonal approach:

  • Medical castration with LHRH analogs or surgical castration (orchiectomy) 2
  • LHRH analogs should be accompanied with antiandrogen for 4 weeks to prevent disease flare 2
  • No proven benefit for continuing total androgen blockade beyond 4 weeks 2

Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC)

Patients with CRPC should continue androgen suppression and receive sequential therapies based on disease burden and prior treatments 2.

Treatment sequence:

  • Docetaxel 75 mg/m² every 3 weeks with prednisone 5 mg orally twice daily for symptomatic metastatic CRPC 4. This provides modest survival benefit and palliates pain 2, 5
  • Olaparib (PARP inhibitor) after novel androgen receptor axis inhibitors for patients with BRCA1/2 alterations (improved OS: HR 0.69,95% CI 0.50-0.97) 3
  • Lutetium-177 PSMA-617 combined with best standard of care for patients pretreated with at least one taxane and one novel androgen receptor axis inhibitor 3

Second-line hormonal therapies:

  • Antiandrogens (cyprosterone acetate, flutamide, bicalutamide, nilutamide) 2
  • Corticosteroids 2
  • Progestins 2

Bone Metastases Management

For painful bone metastases:

  • External beam radiotherapy using 1 × 8 Gy or 10 × 3 Gy fractionation with equal pain-reducing efficacy 2
  • Radioisotope therapy (strontium-89 or samarium-153-EDTMP) 2
  • Intravenous bisphosphonates (pamidronate) or denosumab for pain resistant to palliative radiotherapy 2

Post-Treatment Surveillance

Following radical prostatectomy:

  • Serum PSA should be below detection level after 2 months 2
  • Salvage radiotherapy to prostate bed recommended for PSA failure, starting early 2
  • First follow-up at 3 months, then yearly visits 2

Following external beam radiotherapy:

  • Serum PSA should reach ≤1 ng/mL within 16 months 2

Critical Contraindications and Precautions

Docetaxel should not be administered to:

  • Patients with neutrophil counts <1500 cells/mm³ 4
  • Patients with bilirubin >ULN or AST/ALT >1.5 × ULN with alkaline phosphatase >2.5 × ULN 4
  • Patients with history of severe hypersensitivity reactions to docetaxel or polysorbate 80 4

Common pitfall: A dose of 100 mg/m² docetaxel in previously treated patients is associated with increased hematologic toxicity, infection, and treatment-related mortality 4. The recommended dose is 75 mg/m² every 3 weeks 4.

Patient Selection Considerations

Treatment decisions must account for:

  • Patient age, life expectancy, and comorbidities 2
  • For patients with life expectancy <10 years and low-risk disease, watchful waiting without curative intent may be more appropriate than active surveillance 1
  • Men with comorbid conditions and low-risk disease receive no survival benefit from treatment and are at risk for adverse events without benefit 6
  • Patient preferences regarding quality of life trade-offs, particularly erectile dysfunction (increased by 35% with surgery: 80% vs. 45%) and urinary leakage (increased by 28% with surgery: 49% vs. 21%) 2

References

Guideline

Management of Low-Risk Prostate Cancer in a 66-Year-Old Male

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Current Prostate Cancer Treatments in Human Clinical Trials

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Cancer of the prostate.

Critical reviews in oncology/hematology, 2005

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.