Why is PD-L1 (Programmed Death-Ligand 1) testing not required in non-metastatic breast cancer, but is used to guide immunotherapy decisions in metastatic disease?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

PD-L1 Testing in Breast Cancer: Non-Metastatic vs Metastatic Disease

PD-L1 testing is not required in non-metastatic breast cancer because immunotherapy benefit in the neoadjuvant setting is independent of PD-L1 status, whereas in metastatic disease, PD-L1 expression is a mandatory predictive biomarker that determines eligibility for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and correlates with survival benefit. 1

Non-Metastatic (Early-Stage) Breast Cancer

Neoadjuvant Setting

  • For high-risk early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), pembrolizumab combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is standard of care regardless of PD-L1 status. 1
  • PD-L1 testing is not required in the neoadjuvant setting because clinical benefit is independent of PD-L1 expression. 1
  • The treatment decision is based on disease stage and triple-negative status, not biomarker selection. 1

Key Distinction

The fundamental difference is that neoadjuvant immunotherapy trials demonstrated efficacy across all PD-L1 expression levels, eliminating the need for biomarker-driven patient selection in this curative-intent setting. 1

Metastatic Breast Cancer

Mandatory PD-L1 Testing

Patients with locally recurrent unresectable or metastatic hormone receptor-negative and HER2-negative breast cancer who are candidates for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy must undergo PD-L1 testing with an FDA-approved test. 2

Specific Testing Requirements

For Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy

  • Use the 22C3 companion assay to calculate Combined Positive Score (CPS). 2
  • The CPS is calculated as: (number of PD-L1 staining tumor cells + lymphocytes + macrophages) ÷ (total viable tumor cells) × 100. 2
  • Treatment eligibility requires CPS ≥10. 2
  • At this cutoff, pembrolizumab-chemotherapy improved median PFS from 5.6 to 9.7 months (HR 0.65, P=0.0012). 2

For Atezolizumab Plus Nab-Paclitaxel

  • Use the SP142 assay to assess PD-L1 expression on immune cells. 2
  • Treatment eligibility requires ≥1% PD-L1 expression on immune cells. 2, 1
  • At this cutoff, atezolizumab provided PFS benefit of 7.5 vs 5.0 months (HR 0.62, P<0.001) and OS benefit of 25 vs 15.1 months. 2, 1

Critical Assay-Specific Requirements

The specific assay used in the trial supporting each agent must be obtained—different antibodies and scoring systems are not interchangeable. 2

  • The 22C3 assay evaluates tumor cells, lymphocytes, and macrophages. 2
  • The SP142 assay evaluates immune cells in tumor and stroma. 2
  • Using the wrong assay may incorrectly classify patients as eligible or ineligible for therapy. 2

Why PD-L1 Predicts Benefit in Metastatic Disease

Survival Correlation

In the KEYNOTE-355 trial, patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 had significantly improved outcomes, while those with CPS <10 did not meet statistical significance thresholds. 2

Biomarker Imperfection

PD-L1 is not a perfect biomarker—less than half of biomarker-selected patients benefit from treatment, and some responses occur in biomarker-negative cohorts. 3

  • In KEYNOTE-119 (pembrolizumab monotherapy), there was no OS benefit even in PD-L1-positive patients (HR 0.78, P=0.057 for CPS ≥10). 2
  • This demonstrates that PD-L1 testing is most predictive when immunotherapy is combined with chemotherapy in the first-line metastatic setting. 2

Tissue Sampling Considerations

Primary vs Metastatic Tissue

Considerable discordance exists between PD-L1 status in primary and metastatic breast cancer, emphasizing the importance of appropriate tissue sampling. 4

  • Pooled PD-L1 positivity is higher in primary tumors compared to metastases when assessed in immune cells (51.2% vs 37.1%, P<0.001). 4
  • PD-L1 positivity is lowest in bone metastases (12%) and highest in lymph nodes (60%). 4
  • Repeating PD-L1 testing on metastatic tissue should be considered if primary tumor was negative, particularly for lung, pleura, and liver metastases where negative-to-positive conversion has been documented. 5

Post-Treatment Changes

Primary tumors show higher PD-L1 expression than matched metastatic tumors, and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy tumors show lower PD-L1 expression compared to pre-treatment tumors. 5

Non-Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Immunotherapy should not be used in routine clinical practice for hormone receptor-positive or HER2-positive breast cancer outside clinical trials. 1

  • This applies to both metastatic and non-metastatic settings. 1
  • PD-L1 testing is therefore not indicated for these subtypes in routine practice. 1

Timing Restrictions for Metastatic Immunotherapy

Immunotherapy is only indicated for metastatic disease if disease developed de novo or at least 12 months after completion of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. 2, 1

  • This restriction applies regardless of PD-L1 status. 2
  • Patients with earlier recurrence should receive standard chemotherapy without immunotherapy. 2

References

Guideline

Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

PD-L1 Expression and Immunotherapy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.