Cyclophosphamide Regimen for Induction in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
For remission-induction in organ-threatening or life-threatening AAV, use cyclophosphamide combined with glucocorticoids, with either intravenous (15 mg/kg at weeks 0,2,4,7,10,13) or oral (2 mg/kg/day, maximum 200 mg/day) administration, both achieving similar remission rates but with different toxicity profiles. 1
Route of Administration: IV vs Oral
Choose intravenous cyclophosphamide for:
- Patients with prior moderate cumulative cyclophosphamide exposure 1
- Lower baseline white blood cell counts 1
- Ready access to infusion centers 1
- Concerns about oral medication adherence 1
Choose oral cyclophosphamide for:
- Cost-sensitive situations 1
- Limited infusion center access 1
- Patients who can reliably self-administer oral regimens 1
The CYCLOPS trial demonstrated that IV cyclophosphamide reduces total cumulative dose and lowers leukopenia risk compared to oral administration, though a trend toward more relapses during long-term follow-up was observed with IV dosing. 1
Specific Dosing Regimens
Intravenous cyclophosphamide:
- Standard dose: 15 mg/kg at weeks 0,2,4,7,10, and 13 1, 2
- Dose reductions required for age and renal function 1:
- Age <60 years with creatinine <300 μmol/L: 15 mg/kg/pulse
- Age 60-70 years with creatinine <300 μmol/L: 12.5 mg/kg/pulse
- Age >70 years with creatinine <300 μmol/L: 10 mg/kg/pulse
- Further reductions for creatinine 300-500 μmol/L 1
Oral cyclophosphamide:
Recent evidence suggests that cumulative cyclophosphamide doses of 2.5-3 g may be sufficient for remission induction while reducing infectious complications, particularly in elderly patients. 4
Combination Glucocorticoid Therapy
Initial glucocorticoid dosing:
- Oral prednisolone: 1 mg/kg/day (maximum 80 mg/day) 1
- IV methylprednisolone pulses (1-3 g) for severe presentations 1
Structured tapering schedule (PEXIVAS protocol): 1
- Week 1: 50-75 mg (weight-based)
- Week 2: 25-40 mg
- Weeks 3-4: 20-30 mg
- Progressive taper to 5 mg/day by week 20-22
- Maintain 5 mg/day through week 52
Special Considerations for Severe Renal Disease
For patients with serum creatinine >4 mg/dL (>354 μmol/L):
- Cyclophosphamide is preferred over rituximab due to limited data supporting rituximab in this population 1, 2
- Consider combination therapy: rituximab plus 2 IV cyclophosphamide pulses 1
- Consider plasma exchange for creatinine >3.4 mg/dL, dialysis requirement, or rapidly increasing creatinine 1, 2
Essential Supportive Measures
Uroprotection:
- Encourage high fluid intake or provide IV fluids on infusion days 1
- MESNA (2-mercaptoethanesulfonate sodium) oral or IV with pulse cyclophosphamide 1
- MESNA may benefit patients on continuous oral cyclophosphamide 1
Infection prophylaxis:
- Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 800/160 mg on alternate days or 400/80 mg daily for Pneumocystis jirovecii prophylaxis 1, 2
- Alternatives if contraindicated: dapsone or atovaquone 1
- Inhaled pentamidine is not cost-effective for routine use 1
Antiemetic therapy:
- Routinely administer with IV cyclophosphamide 1
Monitoring Requirements
During cyclophosphamide therapy:
- Regular complete blood counts for leukopenia monitoring 1
- Dose adjustment or discontinuation if acute leukopenia develops 1
- Urinalysis at each visit and throughout follow-up for hemorrhagic cystitis and bladder cancer surveillance 1, 2
- Renal function, inflammatory markers, and ANCA levels 2
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Bladder toxicity risk:
- Cyclophosphamide metabolites cause hemorrhagic cystitis and long-term bladder cancer risk 1
- Tobacco smokers develop cancer at lower doses and earlier 1
- Persistent unexplained hematuria requires investigation even years after cyclophosphamide discontinuation 1
Cumulative dose concerns:
- Long-term cyclophosphamide maintenance is no longer recommended due to toxicity 1
- Switch to azathioprine, methotrexate, or leflunomide for maintenance after remission induction 1
- Lower cumulative doses (2.5-3 g) may maintain efficacy while reducing infectious complications 4
Evidence Quality Considerations
The recommendation for cyclophosphamide has Level 1A evidence for GPA and MPA, but only Level 3 evidence for EGPA, as no RCTs have been published for EGPA. 1 The RAVE and RITUXVAS trials established rituximab as equally effective to cyclophosphamide for most AAV presentations, with rituximab showing superiority in relapsing PR3-ANCA disease. 1, 5 However, for severe renal impairment (creatinine >4 mg/dL), cyclophosphamide remains preferred based on the most recent KDIGO 2024 guidelines. 1