What are the long-term implications of stone intrusion and extrusion during ureteroscopic lithotripsy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Long-Term Implications of Stone Intrusion and Extrusion During Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy

The long-term complications of ureteroscopic stone treatment are minimal, with stricture formation occurring in 2% or less of cases and ureteral perforation rates reduced to less than 5%, making modern ureteroscopy a safe procedure with excellent long-term outcomes. 1

Understanding Stone Migration During URS

During ureteroscopic lithotripsy, stones may migrate proximally into the kidney (intrusion/retropulsion) or fragments may be pushed through the ureteral wall (extrusion). The evidence addresses these scenarios differently:

Stone Retropulsion (Proximal Migration)

When stones migrate proximally during ureteroscopy, conversion to flexible ureteroscopy is the standard approach and does not compromise long-term outcomes. 2

  • Stone migration to the kidney occurred in 51 cases during rigid ureteroscopy for large stones, successfully managed by converting to flexible lithotripsy without adverse long-term sequelae 2
  • The flexible ureteroscope achieves superior stone-free rates (87%) compared with rigid ureteroscopy (77%) for proximal stones, making this conversion beneficial rather than problematic 1
  • Overall stone-free rates for ureteroscopic treatment remain remarkably high at 81% to 94% depending on stone location, regardless of whether conversion was needed 1

Ureteral Perforation and Stone Extrusion

Ureteral perforations, including those with extra-ureteric stone fragments, typically heal without serious long-term consequences, though they may prolong initial hospitalization. 3

  • Perforation occurred in 14% of ureteroscopic cases, usually trivial and near the vesicoureteric junction 3
  • Higher ureteral perforations following endoscopic lithotripsy were occasionally associated with urinary extravasation and extra-ureteric stone fragments 3
  • Critically, there were no serious sequelae from these perforations, though in-patient stay was prolonged beyond the customary 48 hours 3
  • Modern complication rates show ureteral perforation reduced to less than 5% with current techniques 1

Long-Term Structural Outcomes

The risk of long-term ureteral stricture formation following ureteroscopy is 2% or less, representing the primary structural concern. 1

  • This low stricture rate applies across all ureteral locations and stone sizes 1
  • The development of smaller caliber semirigid and flexible ureteroscopes with improved instrumentation (particularly the holmium:YAG laser) has contributed to these excellent long-term outcomes 1

Stone Recurrence Considerations

The technique used for stone treatment (dusting vs. fragmentation with extraction) may influence long-term stone recurrence risk, though both approaches are effective. 4

  • Dusting techniques may place patients at increased risk for future stone events if all resultant debris is not expelled from the collecting system 4
  • Fragmentation with extraction provides more complete initial stone clearance, potentially reducing recurrence risk 4
  • For infection-related stones specifically, the 5-year recurrence risk is 36.8%, with anatomical abnormalities being the primary risk factor rather than the surgical technique itself 5

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not assume that stone fragments left in the collecting system are benign—they can serve as nidi for future stone formation. 4

  • When using dusting techniques, ensure adequate fragment clearance or accept the trade-off of potentially higher recurrence rates 4
  • Patients with anatomical abnormalities require continued surveillance regardless of initial stone-free status, as they face significantly higher recurrence rates 5

Do not delay definitive treatment of perforations with significant extravasation—though long-term outcomes are good, acute management matters. 3

  • Perforations with urinary extravasation require prolonged monitoring but typically resolve without intervention 3
  • The vast majority of patients are rendered stone-free in a single procedure despite these complications 1

Quality of Life Implications

Long-term quality of life following ureteroscopy is excellent, with the procedure avoiding the potential chronic effects associated with shock wave lithotripsy. 6

  • SWL can cause vascular trauma leading to scarring with permanent loss of functional renal volume and has been linked to potentially serious long-term adverse effects including diabetes mellitus 6
  • Ureteroscopy avoids these systemic complications, making it preferable from a long-term morbidity standpoint 6

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.