What is the Child-Pugh (Child-Pugh classification) classification system for liver disease?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Child-Pugh Classification for Liver Disease

The Child-Pugh classification is a validated bedside scoring system that stratifies patients with cirrhosis into three prognostic classes (A, B, or C) based on five clinical and laboratory parameters: encephalopathy, ascites, bilirubin, albumin, and prothrombin time/INR. 1

Scoring Components

The Child-Pugh score assigns 1-3 points for each of five parameters, with total scores ranging from 5-15 points 2:

Laboratory Parameters

  • Bilirubin: <2 mg/dL (1 point), 2-3 mg/dL (2 points), >3 mg/dL (3 points) 2
  • Albumin: >3.5 g/dL (1 point), 2.8-3.5 g/dL (2 points), <2.8 g/dL (3 points) 2
  • Prothrombin time/INR: <4 seconds or INR <1.7 (1 point), 4-6 seconds or INR 1.7-2.3 (2 points), >6 seconds or INR >2.3 (3 points) 2

Clinical Parameters

  • Encephalopathy: None (1 point), Grade 1-2 (2 points), Grade 3-4 (3 points) 2
  • Ascites: Absent (1 point), Slight (2 points), Moderate to severe (3 points) 2

Classification and Prognosis

Patients are classified into three distinct prognostic categories based on total score 1:

  • Class A (5-6 points): Compensated cirrhosis with 90% 5-year survival 2
  • Class B (7-9 points): Decompensated cirrhosis with 80% 5-year survival 2
  • Class C (10-15 points): Advanced decompensated cirrhosis with >33% mortality within 1 year 2

The classification effectively separates patients into groups with significantly different median survivals and survival curves (p <0.0001) 3.

Clinical Applications

Treatment Decision-Making

The Child-Pugh score directly guides therapeutic interventions and determines eligibility for major procedures 1:

  • Class A patients: Candidates for surgical resection, liver transplantation, and aggressive interventions 1
  • Class B patients: Selected favorable Class B patients may be considered for specific treatments; unfavorable Class B patients should receive palliative approaches 1
  • Class C patients: Should receive only supportive care unless on transplant waiting list, given poor anticipated survival 1

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Management

The score is essential for HCC treatment planning, as it assesses hepatic functional reserve in patients where tumor burden and liver function both impact prognosis 1. The NCCN guidelines specifically incorporate Child-Pugh classification to stratify HCC patients for resection, transplantation, or palliative therapy 1.

Perioperative Risk Assessment

Child-Pugh classification predicts perioperative mortality and helps determine surgical candidacy, particularly for hepatectomy in cirrhotic patients 1, 2.

Advantages and Limitations

Key Advantages

  • Simplicity: Can be calculated at bedside without complex formulas 1, 3
  • Availability: Uses widely available laboratory tests and clinical assessments 3
  • Validation: Well-established with decades of clinical use and validation 3
  • Clinical parameters: Incorporates subjective but clinically relevant findings (ascites, encephalopathy) 1

Important Limitations

The Child-Pugh score has several critical shortcomings that must be recognized 1, 2:

  • Subjective components: Grading of ascites and encephalopathy introduces inter-observer variability 2
  • No renal function assessment: Does not include creatinine, an established prognostic marker in liver disease 1
  • Limited dynamic range: Categorizes continuous variables into only three groups, reducing discriminatory power 2
  • Ceiling effect: Most patients cluster in Class A (score 5-6), limiting prognostic granularity in compensated cirrhosis 2

Comparison with MELD Score

The MELD score (using bilirubin, creatinine, and INR) provides more objective assessment and better predicts short-term mortality 1:

  • MELD includes renal function (creatinine), which Child-Pugh lacks 1
  • MELD uses continuous variables without arbitrary cutoffs 1
  • MELD is the standard for liver transplant allocation in the United States 1
  • It remains unclear whether MELD is superior to Child-Pugh for predicting survival in non-transplant cirrhosis patients 1

Critical Clinical Pearls

Portal hypertension assessment should always accompany Child-Pugh scoring 1. Look for esophagogastric varices, splenomegaly, abdominal collaterals, and thrombocytopenia, as these findings significantly impact prognosis independent of the Child-Pugh score 1.

A 2-point worsening in Child-Pugh score or progression from Class A to Class B accurately indicates deteriorating health status and increased mortality risk 2. This makes the score useful for monitoring disease progression over time.

Development of decompensating events (ascites, variceal bleeding, hepatorenal syndrome) dramatically worsens prognosis, with 5-year survival dropping to 20-50% regardless of initial Child-Pugh class 2.

Current Role in Practice

Despite ongoing debate about whether to abandon Child-Pugh classification 4, it remains widely used in clinical practice, particularly for HCC staging systems (BCLC classification) and treatment algorithms 1. The AASLD continues to recommend Child-Pugh classification over MELD for HCC management contexts 1, primarily because it is more commonly used in this setting and incorporates clinical parameters relevant to treatment tolerance.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Liver Disease Prognosis Using the Child-Pugh Score

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Child-Pugh Classification: Time to Abandon?

Seminars in liver disease, 2019

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.