What is the difference between a syphilis chancre and a chancroid chancre?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Distinguishing Syphilis Chancre from Chancroid Chancre

The syphilitic chancre is typically painless, indurated, and clean-based with a single ulcer, while the chancroid chancre is painful, soft, purulent, and often multiple with ragged undermined edges—but clinical diagnosis alone is unreliable, with classic presentations occurring in only 31-35% of cases. 1, 2

Key Clinical Differences

Syphilis Chancre (Primary Syphilis)

  • Pain: Painless ulcer is the hallmark feature 1, 3
  • Consistency: Indurated (firm) base—hence the term "ulcus durum" (hard chancre) 3, 4
  • Appearance: Clean-based ulcer with well-defined borders 1, 2
  • Number: Usually single, though atypical presentations with multiple ulcers can occur 3, 4
  • Lymphadenopathy: Firm, non-tender, rubbery regional lymph nodes 3
  • Healing: Resolves spontaneously without scarring in 3-6 weeks 3

Chancroid Chancre (Haemophilus ducreyi)

  • Pain: Painful ulcer is characteristic 1, 5
  • Consistency: Soft, non-indurated base—hence "soft chancre" or "ulcus molle" 5
  • Appearance: Deep ulcer with purulent (pus-filled) base, ragged and undermined edges, highly inflamed borders 1, 5
  • Number: Often multiple ulcers that may coalesce 5
  • Lymphadenopathy: Tender, often unilateral inguinal nodes that may suppurate (form buboes with pus discharge) 1, 5
  • Healing: Heals with scarring, especially in extensive cases 1

Critical Diagnostic Pitfall

The classic clinical presentations described above occur in only a minority of patients—31% sensitivity for syphilis, 34% for chancroid, making clinical diagnosis alone highly unreliable. 2 There is considerable overlap in clinical presentations, and 10% of patients with genital ulcers have co-infections with both T. pallidum and H. ducreyi or HSV. 1

Essential Laboratory Workup

Since clinical diagnosis is inaccurate, the CDC mandates specific testing for all genital ulcers: 1

  • Darkfield microscopy or direct immunofluorescence for Treponema pallidum from ulcer exudate 1
  • Serologic test for syphilis (VDRL or RPR) performed at least 7 days after ulcer onset 1
  • Culture for Haemophilus ducreyi on special media (though sensitivity ≤80% even with optimal media) 1
  • HSV culture or antigen test to exclude herpes 1
  • HIV testing is mandatory, as both conditions are cofactors for HIV transmission 1

Pathognomonic Clinical Sign

The combination of a painful ulcer with tender inguinal adenopathy that progresses to suppurative (pus-forming) inguinal adenopathy is almost pathognomonic for chancroid. 1 This occurs in approximately one-third of chancroid patients and is rarely seen with syphilis. 1

Empiric Treatment When Diagnosis Unclear

When laboratory confirmation is unavailable or delayed, the CDC recommends: 1

  • Treat for syphilis if diagnosis is uncertain
  • Treat for both syphilis AND chancroid if the patient resides in a community where H. ducreyi is prevalent, especially when diagnostic capabilities are limited 1
  • This dual approach is critical because even after complete diagnostic evaluation, at least 25% of genital ulcers have no laboratory-confirmed diagnosis 1

Geographic Considerations

Chancroid is endemic in certain U.S. areas and occurs in discrete outbreaks, while syphilis has broader geographic distribution. 1 Local epidemiology should guide empiric treatment decisions when diagnostic testing is delayed. 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

The clinical diagnosis of genital ulcer disease in men.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 1997

Research

[Syphilis. Clinical aspects of Treponema pallidum infection].

Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2004

Research

Syphilis: uncommon presentations in adults.

Clinics in dermatology, 2005

Research

[Chancroid].

The Pan African medical journal, 2019

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.