Screening for Fatty Liver Disease
Screen patients with diabetes, metabolic syndrome (≥2 metabolic risk factors), obesity, or persistently elevated liver enzymes using liver function tests and abdominal ultrasonography as the primary imaging modality. 1
Who Should Be Screened
High-Priority Groups (Mandatory Screening)
- Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus - screening is cost-effective and should be performed regardless of liver enzyme levels 1
- Patients with persistently elevated AST or ALT - NAFLD is the most common cause of unexplained liver enzyme elevation 1
- Patients with ≥2 metabolic syndrome components, including:
Additional At-Risk Groups to Consider
- Patients with incidental hepatic steatosis found on imaging performed for other reasons, especially if aminotransferases are elevated 1
- Obese patients (BMI ≥30 kg/m²) with metabolic syndrome features 1
Important caveat: Universal population screening is NOT recommended due to high costs, low predictive value of non-invasive tests, and lack of definitive treatments 1
Initial Screening Approach
Step 1: Laboratory Testing
When elevated liver enzymes are detected, obtain comprehensive history and perform tests to exclude other causes before diagnosing NAFLD 1:
Essential exclusions:
- Alcohol use - screen using validated tools (AUDIT questionnaire) 1
- Viral hepatitis - hepatitis B and C serologies 1
- Drug-induced hepatitis - review all medications and supplements 1
- Autoimmune liver diseases - ANA, anti-smooth muscle antibody 1
- Wilson's disease - ceruloplasmin (especially in younger patients) 1
- Hemochromatosis - iron studies, ferritin 1
Baseline metabolic panel should include:
- Complete blood count 1
- Comprehensive metabolic panel (AST, ALT, albumin, bilirubin) 1
- Lipid panel 1
- Fasting glucose or HbA1c 1
Step 2: Primary Imaging - Abdominal Ultrasonography
Abdominal ultrasonography is the recommended first-line screening modality for detecting hepatic steatosis 1, 2
Advantages:
- Wide availability and cost-effectiveness 2
- High accuracy for moderate-to-severe steatosis (>30% fat content) 1, 2
- Can evaluate entire hepatobiliary system 2
- No radiation exposure 2
Limitations to recognize:
- Sensitivity <70% when hepatic fat is <30% 1, 2
- Subjective interpretation with operator dependency 1, 2
- Difficult in obese patients 1, 2
- Cannot distinguish simple steatosis from steatohepatitis 1, 2
Step 3: Risk Stratification for Advanced Fibrosis
In patients with confirmed or suspected NAFLD, particularly high-risk individuals (age >50 years, diabetes, metabolic syndrome), assess for advanced fibrosis using non-invasive scores 1:
FIB-4 Score (preferred initial test):
- Uses age, AST, ALT, and platelet count 1
- Best diagnostic accuracy for advanced fibrosis among simple scores 1
- Cost-effective as first-tier assessment 1
NAFLD Fibrosis Score (alternative):
- Uses age, BMI, hyperglycemia, AST/ALT ratio, platelet count, albumin 1
Alternative and Advanced Imaging Modalities
When Ultrasonography is Inadequate or Inconclusive
Transient Elastography with Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP):
- Simultaneously quantifies fat deposition and assesses fibrosis 1, 2
- Useful for monitoring changes over time 2
- Limitation: Accuracy decreases in obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m²), with 5-13% failure rate 1
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI):
- Superior to ultrasonography for detecting mild steatosis (<30% fat) 1, 2
- More accurate quantification of hepatic fat 2
- Limitation: High cost and limited availability 1, 2
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS):
- Most precise measurement of hepatic triglycerides 1
- Limitation: Expensive and cannot distinguish simple steatosis from steatohepatitis 1
CT Scanning:
- High specificity but low sensitivity for hepatic fat 1
- Generally not recommended for screening due to radiation exposure 1
Screening for Associated Metabolic Complications
When fatty liver is detected, screen for associated conditions because effective treatments exist for these comorbidities 1:
- Metabolic syndrome components - assess all five criteria 1
- Type 2 diabetes - fasting glucose, HbA1c, oral glucose tolerance test if indicated 1
- Cardiovascular disease risk - lipid panel, blood pressure, consider coronary artery calcium scoring in high-risk patients 1
- Chronic kidney disease - creatinine, eGFR, urinalysis 1
Clinical Algorithm Summary
- Identify at-risk patients: diabetes, metabolic syndrome ≥2 features, obesity, elevated liver enzymes 1
- Obtain baseline labs: liver function tests, CBC, metabolic panel, exclude other liver diseases 1
- Perform abdominal ultrasonography as primary screening 1, 2
- Calculate FIB-4 score to assess fibrosis risk in confirmed NAFLD 1
- Consider advanced imaging (MRI, transient elastography) if ultrasonography inconclusive or for quantitative assessment 2
- Screen for metabolic comorbidities when NAFLD is detected 1
Critical pitfall: Do not rely solely on liver enzymes for screening, as they can be normal in 50% of patients with NAFLD, including those with advanced fibrosis 1, 3