What is the treatment for phlegmon?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment of Phlegmon

For appendiceal phlegmon, non-operative management with antibiotics (and percutaneous drainage if an abscess is present) is the recommended first-line treatment when advanced laparoscopic expertise is unavailable, while laparoscopic appendectomy is preferred when such expertise is available. 1

Initial Treatment Approach

The optimal treatment strategy depends critically on the availability of advanced laparoscopic surgical expertise and the specific clinical presentation:

When Laparoscopic Expertise is Available

Laparoscopic appendectomy is the treatment of choice for appendiceal phlegmon or abscess when advanced laparoscopic expertise is available, with a low threshold for conversion to open surgery. 1 This approach offers several advantages:

  • Fewer readmissions compared to conservative management (3% versus 27%, P = 0.026) 1
  • Fewer additional interventions required (7% versus higher rates with conservative treatment) 1
  • Shorter hospital stay by approximately 1 day compared to conservative treatment in high-quality RCTs 1
  • Lower incidence of bowel resection (3.3% vs 17.1%, P = 0.048) when compared to patients who fail non-operative management 1

Important caveat: Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery have a 10% risk of bowel resection and 13% risk of incomplete appendectomy, requiring experienced surgical judgment 1

When Laparoscopic Expertise is Not Available

Non-operative management with antibiotics and percutaneous drainage (if accessible) is recommended for complicated appendicitis with periappendicular abscess or phlegmon. 1 This approach:

  • Succeeds in over 90% of patients with appendicular abscess or phlegmon 1
  • Requires percutaneous drainage in only 19.7% of cases 1
  • Fails in 7.2% of patients, necessitating operative intervention 2
  • Associated with 25.4% failure rate in patients with appendiceal abscesses who received drains, with older age and later drain placement predicting successful treatment 1

Critical warning: All patients who fail non-operative management (25.7%) typically require open operation, with most requiring bowel resection 1

Antibiotic Therapy

For all patients with phlegmon, broad-spectrum antibiotics are essential regardless of whether surgical or non-operative management is chosen 1, 3

Special Considerations

Crohn's Disease-Related Phlegmon

For abdominal phlegmon in penetrating Crohn's disease, combination therapy with antibiotics and anti-TNF antibody therapy is safe and effective after infection has been controlled. 3 This approach avoids surgical resection in most cases, though anti-TNF therapy should only be initiated after adequate antibiotic treatment 3

Interval Appendectomy Decision

Routine interval appendectomy is NOT recommended after successful non-operative management in most patients 1:

  • Risk of recurrence is only 7.4% after successful non-operative treatment 1, 2
  • Interval appendectomy carries 12.4% morbidity 1
  • Cost-effectiveness favors observation over routine interval appendectomy, reserving surgery only for patients with recurrent symptoms 1

Exception: For patients ≥40 years old with complicated appendicitis, both colonoscopy and interval full-dose contrast-enhanced CT scan are recommended due to 17% rate of neoplasms found in this age group 1, 4

Key Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not delay percutaneous drainage when technically feasible for appendiceal abscess, as later drain placement predicts treatment failure 1
  • Do not attempt immediate surgery for appendiceal phlegmon/abscess without advanced laparoscopic expertise, as this is associated with significantly more complications (wound infections, abdominal/pelvic abscesses, ileus/bowel obstructions, and re-operations) compared to conservative treatment 1
  • Do not fail to follow up patients ≥40 years old after non-operative management, as they have higher risk of underlying malignancy 4
  • Maintain low threshold for conversion to open surgery during laparoscopic approach 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of Appendiceal Mucocele

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.