How is a patient's electroencephalogram (EEG) affected in the prognosis of a patient after post cardiac arrest?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

EEG in Post-Cardiac Arrest Prognosis

EEG is a critical tool for neurological prognostication after cardiac arrest, with specific patterns reliably predicting poor outcomes when assessed ≥72 hours post-ROSC, though no EEG findings within the first 24 hours can reliably predict outcome. 1

Timing of EEG Assessment for Prognostication

Critical timing principle: No electrophysiological study, including EEG, reliably predicts outcome during the first 24 hours after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). 1 The earliest reliable prognostication occurs at 72 hours post-cardiac arrest in patients not treated with targeted temperature management (TTM). 2

Key Temporal Considerations:

  • 24 hours post-ROSC: EEG interpretation may assist with predicting poor outcome in normothermic patients without confounders, but reliability is limited 1
  • 72 hours post-ROSC: This is the optimal timepoint for reliable prognostication in both TTM-treated and non-TTM patients 1
  • One week post-arrest: Specific EEG findings become increasingly useful for predicting poor outcomes 1

EEG Patterns Predicting Poor Outcome

In Patients Treated with TTM (32-34°C):

During hypothermia:

  • Burst-suppression pattern: 0-6% false positive rate (FPR), though some studies show up to 6% FPR 1
  • Absence of EEG reactivity to external stimuli: 2% FPR (95% CI: 1-7%) 1

After rewarming (≥72 hours post-ROSC):

  • Persistent burst-suppression: 0% FPR (95% CI: 0-5%) - highly reliable predictor 1
  • Persistent absence of EEG reactivity: 0% FPR (95% CI: 0-3%) - most reliable predictor 1
  • Intractable status epilepticus (>72 hours) without EEG reactivity: May reasonably predict poor outcome 1, 2

In Patients NOT Treated with TTM:

At 72 hours or more post-ROSC:

  • Burst-suppression pattern: 0% FPR (95% CI: 0-11%) 1
  • Generalized suppression to <20 μV: Associated with poor outcome (3% FPR, 95% CI: 0.9-11%) 1
  • Burst-suppression with generalized epileptic activity: 3% FPR 1
  • Diffuse periodic complexes on flat background: 3% FPR 1
  • EEG grades 4-5: 0% FPR (95% CI: 0-8%) at ≤72 hours 1

Important Confounding Factors

EEG interpretation is only reliable in the absence of:

  • Sedatives or neuromuscular blockers 1
  • Hypotension 1
  • Hypothermia (when assessing normothermic patterns) 1
  • Seizures 1
  • Hypoxemia 1

Critical caveat: The prognostic accuracy of malignant EEG patterns is less reliable in patients treated with hypothermia, particularly during the cooling phase. 1

EEG Patterns Associated with Potential Good Outcome

Favorable prognostic indicators:

  • Continuous cortical background activity within 12 hours of ROSC is associated with favorable neurological outcome 1
  • Reactive EEG background (response to external stimuli) suggests better prognosis 1
  • Presence of sleep spindles on initial EEG associated with favorable outcome at 6 months 1
  • Moderate encephalopathy (diffuse slowing with reactivity/variability) has better prognosis than severe patterns 3

Temporal evolution matters: Patients who develop epileptiform abnormalities >24 hours after ROSC are more likely to recover than those with immediate onset. 2, 4

Seizures and Epileptiform Activity

Detection and Prevalence:

  • Seizures occur in 10-35% of post-cardiac arrest patients who remain unresponsive after ROSC 2
  • Nonconvulsive seizures are particularly common, detected in approximately 20-25% of comatose survivors 1
  • Continuous EEG monitoring is more sensitive than brief intermittent recordings due to the episodic nature of seizures 1, 4

Prognostic Implications:

  • Status epilepticus in TTM-treated patients: 7-11.5% FPR for poor outcome 1
  • Seizures with reactive EEG background: Some patients achieve good outcome despite seizures 1
  • Seizures with unreactive or discontinuous background: Almost invariably poor outcome 1
  • Unequivocal electrographic seizures (frequencies ≥2.5 Hz) or evolving patterns suggest worse prognosis 1

Treatment Recommendations:

  • Treat clinically apparent seizures (Class 1 recommendation) 1, 2
  • Treat nonconvulsive seizures detected by EEG (Class 2a recommendation) 1, 2
  • Do NOT use prophylactic antiseizure medications (Class 3: No Benefit) 2

Myoclonus: Special Considerations

Critical distinction: Myoclonus alone should NOT be used to predict poor outcome due to high false positive rates (5-11% FPR). 1, 2

However, status myoclonus (persistent, generalized myoclonus during first 72-120 hours) combined with other poor prognostic indicators is reasonable for predicting poor outcome (0% FPR, 95% CI: 0-4%). 1

Types of myoclonus with different implications:

  • Subcortical myoclonus (no EEG correlate): May not warrant aggressive antiseizure treatment 1
  • Cortical myoclonus (lockstep with epileptiform activity): Consider treatment 1
  • Myoclonus with continuous cortical background: Some patients may recover 1, 4

Practical Implementation Algorithm

Step 1: Timing of EEG Assessment

  1. Perform EEG promptly in all comatose post-cardiac arrest patients who cannot follow commands 2, 5
  2. Consider continuous EEG monitoring rather than single snapshot recordings 1, 2
  3. Do not make prognostic decisions based on EEG <72 hours post-ROSC 1, 2

Step 2: Ensure Absence of Confounders

Before interpreting EEG for prognosis, verify:

  • No active sedation or recent neuromuscular blockade 1
  • Hemodynamically stable (no hypotension) 1
  • If TTM used, patient has completed rewarming and achieved normothermia 1
  • No ongoing hypoxemia 1

Step 3: Pattern Recognition at ≥72 Hours

Highly malignant patterns (predict poor outcome with high reliability):

  • Persistent burst-suppression after rewarming 1
  • Persistent absence of EEG reactivity to stimuli 1
  • Generalized suppression <20 μV 1
  • Intractable status epilepticus (>72 hours) without reactivity 1, 2

Potentially favorable patterns:

  • Continuous background activity 1, 3
  • Reactive EEG (responds to stimulation) 1
  • Moderate encephalopathy with reactivity/variability 3

Step 4: Multimodal Integration

Never use EEG alone for prognostication. Combine with:

  • Clinical neurological examination (pupillary/corneal reflexes at 72 hours) 1
  • Somatosensory evoked potentials (bilateral absent N20 has 0-2% FPR) 1
  • Neuroimaging (MRI/CT findings) 1
  • Biomarkers (NSE, S100B) 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Premature prognostication: Do not make withdrawal decisions based on EEG findings <72 hours post-ROSC 1, 2

  2. Ignoring confounders: Sedation, hypothermia, and neuromuscular blockade can produce malignant-appearing EEG patterns that are reversible 1

  3. Over-reliance on single modality: EEG should never be the sole criterion for prognostication 1, 2

  4. Misinterpreting myoclonus: Presence of myoclonus alone has unacceptably high false positive rate for poor outcome prediction 1, 2

  5. Technical factors affecting interpretation: Low-voltage EEG can result from scalp edema, extra-axial fluid, or technical issues rather than true brain injury 1

  6. Self-fulfilling prophecy: Be aware that EEG findings may influence withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment decisions, potentially inflating apparent predictive accuracy 1

Pediatric Considerations

In children after cardiac arrest, EEG background patterns have similar prognostic value, with incrementally worse backgrounds (normal → slow-disorganized → discontinuous/burst-suppression → attenuated-featureless) associated with progressively worse outcomes. 1 However, EEG should not be used as the sole criterion for prognostication in pediatric patients. 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of EEG Slowing After Cardiac Arrest

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Differentiating and Treating Seizures versus Myoclonus

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

EEG Interpretation and Treatment Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.