Differentiating Leukemoid Reaction from Leukemia
The critical distinction between leukemoid reaction and leukemia requires bone marrow examination with cytogenetics and molecular testing—specifically, the presence of BCR-ABL fusion gene (by RT-PCR or cytogenetics showing t(9;22)) definitively diagnoses chronic myeloid leukemia, while its absence with identification of an underlying cause (infection, malignancy, hemorrhage) confirms leukemoid reaction. 1, 2
Initial Clinical Assessment
Key Clinical Features to Evaluate
Leukemoid reaction typically presents with:
- White blood cell count >50,000 cells/μL in response to severe medical conditions 3, 2
- Identifiable underlying cause: severe infection (most common), non-hematopoietic malignancy, severe hemorrhage, acute hemolysis, or intoxication 2, 4
- Transient elevation that resolves when underlying condition is treated 3, 5
Chronic myeloid leukemia presents with:
- Leukocytosis with basophilia and immature granulocytes (metamyelocytes, myelocytes, promyelocytes) 1
- Splenomegaly in >50% of patients 1
- Often asymptomatic at diagnosis (40% of cases discovered incidentally) 1
Critical Peripheral Blood Findings
- Absolute basophilia ≥200/mm³ strongly suggests CML over leukemoid reaction 6
- In preleukemic CML, WBC may be normal or only mildly elevated (3.6-14.3 K/mm³), making diagnosis challenging 6
Definitive Diagnostic Algorithm
Step 1: Bone Marrow Examination (Mandatory)
Perform bone marrow aspirate and biopsy with:
- Examination of at least 500 nucleated cells 7
- Blast count assessment (≥20% blasts confirms acute leukemia) 1, 7
- Morphologic evaluation for dysplasia 1
Step 2: Cytogenetic Analysis (Essential)
Chromosome banding analysis (CBA) of marrow cell metaphases is required to:
- Detect t(9;22)(q34;q11.2) which confirms CML 1, 6
- Identify other recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities in AML: t(15;17), t(8;21), inv(16) 1
- If marrow cells cannot be obtained, substitute with interphase FISH using dual-color dual-fusion probes for BCR-ABL 1
Step 3: Molecular Testing (Confirmatory)
Qualitative RT-PCR on RNA from fresh bone marrow or blood:
- Detects BCR-ABL transcripts (e14a2, e13a2, or rarely e19a2, e1a2) confirming CML 1
- Absence of BCR-ABL excludes CML 6
Step 4: Immunophenotyping
Multiparameter flow cytometry to:
- Determine lineage involvement in acute leukemias 7
- Distinguish AML from acute lymphocytic leukemia 1
- Evaluate for aberrant antigen expression 1
Bone Marrow Morphologic Distinctions
Leukemoid Reaction Features:
- Straight microvessels on CD34 staining 6
- Only 13% small, hypolobated megakaryocytes 6
- Mean microvascular density: 5.0 ± 1.0 vessels/200× field 6
- No significant dysplasia 1
CML Features:
- Tortuous microvessels with abnormal branching on CD34 6
- 40-86% small, hypolobated "dwarf megakaryocytes" 1, 6
- Mean microvascular density: 10.0-12.5 vessels/200× field 6
- Blasts <5% in chronic phase 1
- Moderate to marked reticulin fibrosis in ~30% 1
AML Features:
- ≥20% blasts in marrow or peripheral blood 1
- Positive myeloperoxidase or nonspecific esterase staining 7
- May show multilineage dysplasia 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not rely solely on peripheral blood findings—bone marrow examination with cytogenetics is mandatory to exclude leukemia 1, 2
- Do not assume normal/mildly elevated WBC excludes CML—preleukemic CML can present with WBC as low as 3.6 K/mm³ 6
- Do not delay cytogenetic testing—this is the definitive test to distinguish leukemoid reaction from CML 1
- Do not confuse transient leukocytosis during treatment with disease progression—leukemoid reactions can occur during chemotherapy (e.g., azacitidine) and resolve spontaneously 5
Prognostic Considerations
Leukemoid reaction carries poor prognosis with high mortality, particularly when caused by:
- Infection (most common cause, 59% of cases) 4
- Paraneoplastic syndrome from non-hematopoietic malignancy 4
- Risk factors for death: lower hemoglobin, older age, increased segmented neutrophil count 4
The underlying cause determines outcome, not the leukocytosis itself—aggressive treatment of the precipitating condition is essential 3, 4.