Testing for Ceftazidime-Avibactam + Aztreonam Synergy and Carbapenem Susceptibility
Yes, you should request susceptibility testing for both ceftazidime-avibactam and carbapenems, and specifically ask for aztreonam testing when metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing organisms are suspected or confirmed, as this combination represents a critical treatment option for these highly resistant pathogens. 1
When to Request This Testing
For Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE)
- Request ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility testing for all CRE isolates, as it is active against Ambler class A (KPC) and certain class D (OXA-48) carbapenemases 1
- Add aztreonam susceptibility testing when MBL production is suspected or confirmed (NDM, VIM, IMP producers), as ceftazidime-avibactam alone is inactive against MBL producers 1
- Always include carbapenem susceptibility testing to determine if meropenem MIC ≤8 mg/L, which may allow carbapenem-based therapy and preserve newer agents 1
For Severe Infections
The 2022 ESCMID guidelines specifically recommend aztreonam plus ceftazidime-avibactam combination therapy for patients with severe infections caused by CRE carrying metallo-β-lactamases and/or resistant to new antibiotic monotherapies (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty evidence) 1
Clinical Algorithm for Testing Decisions
Step 1: Identify High-Risk Scenarios
Request comprehensive testing when:
- Patient has healthcare-associated infections with risk factors for multidrug-resistant organisms 1
- Previous isolation of ESBL-producing or carbapenem-resistant organisms 1
- Recent travel to areas with high MBL prevalence (South Asia, Mediterranean regions) 2
- Clinical failure on standard carbapenem therapy 1
Step 2: Determine Carbapenemase Type
- Ascertain the carbapenemase type before initiating ceftazidime-avibactam treatment whenever possible 1
- If KPC or OXA-48 producers: ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy may suffice 1
- If MBL producers (NDM, VIM, IMP): aztreonam plus ceftazidime-avibactam combination is required 1
Step 3: Request Specific Testing
For suspected MBL producers:
- Ceftazidime-avibactam MIC determination 3
- Aztreonam MIC determination 4
- Carbapenem MIC (specifically meropenem) 1
- Molecular testing for carbapenemase genes when available 1, 5
Evidence Supporting the Combination
Synergy Data
The combination of aztreonam with ceftazidime-avibactam demonstrates good in vitro synergy against both NDM-producing and KPC-producing organisms 1. Aztreonam is not hydrolyzed by metallo-β-lactamases, while avibactam protects aztreonam from degradation by serine β-lactamases 5, 6
- In one prospective study of MBL-producing CRE bloodstream infections, 30-day mortality was 19.2% with ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam versus 44% with other active agents (P=0.007) 1
- Synergistic activity was demonstrated in 16 out of 19 VIM-producing isolates tested 7
- The combination restored bactericidal activity in 80% of MBL-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates 8
Laboratory Considerations
Ceftazidime in the combination does not affect the in vitro activity of aztreonam-avibactam - all tested isolates showed MICs within one 2-fold dilution regardless of ceftazidime concentration 6. This means laboratories can reliably test aztreonam-avibactam susceptibility as a surrogate when considering the ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam combination 6
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Resistance Development
- Resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam can emerge during treatment in 3.7-8.1% of patients through KPC protein mutations or novel β-lactamases like VEB-25 1
- This underscores the importance of combination therapy for severe infections and appropriate antimicrobial stewardship 1
Inappropriate Monotherapy
- Do not use ceftazidime-avibactam alone for confirmed or suspected MBL producers - it lacks activity against metallo-β-lactamases 1, 5
- For non-severe infections in stable patients, consider older agents (aminoglycosides, colistin) based on susceptibility to preserve newer agents 1
Testing Limitations
- Standard automated susceptibility testing may not detect all resistance mechanisms 1
- When MBL production is suspected based on resistance patterns but molecular testing is unavailable, empirically treat as MBL-positive and request aztreonam testing 2
Antibiotic Stewardship Considerations
Reserve ceftazidime-avibactam and the aztreonam combination for extensively resistant bacteria 1. The 2022 ESCMID guidelines emphasize avoiding new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations for infections caused by organisms susceptible to older agents due to stewardship considerations 1
For non-severe CRE infections, use older antibiotics chosen from in vitro active agents on an individual basis according to infection source (good practice statement) 1