What labs are used to diagnose liver fibrosis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Laboratory Tests for Liver Fibrosis Assessment

Use FIB-4 and APRI as first-line serum markers for liver fibrosis screening, followed by imaging-based tests like transient elastography when serum markers indicate intermediate or high risk. 1

Primary Serum Biomarkers

Laboratory assessment of liver fibrosis relies on two categories of serum markers that can be obtained through routine blood work 1:

Indirect Markers (Reflecting Liver Damage)

These are the most commonly used and include:

  • AST (Aspartate aminotransferase) 1
  • ALT (Alanine aminotransferase) 1
  • Platelet count 1
  • Total bilirubin 1
  • Prothrombin time/INR 1
  • Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) 1
  • Albumin 1
  • Haptoglobin 1
  • α2-macroglobulin 1
  • Apolipoprotein A1 1
  • Cholesterol 1

Direct Markers (Measuring Fibrogenesis)

These measure components released during extracellular matrix remodeling:

  • Hyaluronic acid (HA) 1
  • TIMP-1 (Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1) 1
  • PIIINP (Amino terminal peptide of procollagen III) 1

Validated Scoring Systems

Individual markers have poor diagnostic performance, so validated algorithms combining multiple parameters are essential 1:

Most Widely Recommended Scores

FIB-4 (Fibrosis-4 Index) - First-line test 1:

  • Formula: Age (years) × AST (IU/L) / [Platelet count (10⁹/L) × √ALT (IU/L)]
  • FIB-4 <1.3: Rules out advanced fibrosis (90% accuracy) 1
  • FIB-4 >2.67: Indicates advanced fibrosis (80% accuracy) 1
  • For patients ≥65 years: Use cutoff of <2.0 for low risk 1

APRI (AST-to-Platelet Ratio Index) - Alternative first-line test 1, 2:

  • Formula: (AST [IU/L] / AST ULN [IU/L]) / Platelet count [10⁹/L] × 100
  • Validated in chronic hepatitis C and NAFLD 1

Disease-Specific Scores

NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS) - For metabolic liver disease 1:

  • Formula: -1.675 + 0.037 × age + 0.094 × BMI + 1.13 × diabetes (yes=1, no=0) + 0.99 × AST/ALT ratio - 0.013 × platelet count - 0.66 × albumin
  • NFS <-1.455: Excludes advanced fibrosis 1
  • NFS >0.676: Indicates advanced fibrosis 1

Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Score - Proprietary panel 1:

  • Combines hyaluronic acid, TIMP-1, and PIIINP 1
  • ELF >9.8: High risk of liver-related mortality 3
  • ELF cutoff 0.3576 for advanced fibrosis (AUC 0.90) 1

Additional Validated Scores

BARD Score - For NAFLD 1:

  • AST/ALT ratio ≥0.8 = 2 points, BMI ≥28 kg/m² = 1 point, diabetes = 1 point

Forns Index - For chronic hepatitis C 1:

  • Formula: 7.811 - 3.131 × ln(platelet count) + 0.781 × ln(GGT) + 3.467 × ln(age) - 0.014 × cholesterol

FibroTest® - Proprietary algorithm 1:

  • Combines total bilirubin, GGT, α2-macroglobulin, apolipoprotein A1, and haptoglobin, adjusted for age and sex

Clinical Algorithm for Laboratory Assessment

Step 1: Initial Screening 1

  • Order basic labs: AST, ALT, platelet count, albumin
  • Calculate FIB-4 or APRI
  • Add age, BMI, diabetes status for NFS if NAFLD suspected

Step 2: Risk Stratification 1

  • Low risk (FIB-4 <1.3 or <2.0 if age ≥65): Reassess in 1-3 years
  • Intermediate risk (FIB-4 1.3-2.67): Proceed to imaging (transient elastography) or refer to hepatologist
  • High risk (FIB-4 >2.67): Immediate hepatology referral and imaging confirmation

Step 3: Advanced Testing for Intermediate Risk 1

  • Consider ELF panel if available
  • Order M2BPGi or AsAGP if accessible
  • Proceed to vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) or MRE

Important Clinical Caveats

Age-related considerations: FIB-4 and NFS incorporate age, which can lead to false positives in elderly patients (use adjusted cutoffs) 1, 4

Disease-specific limitations: FIB-4 diagnostic accuracy may be lower in NAFLD patients with type 2 diabetes 1

AST/ALT ratio alone has poor diagnostic performance despite historical use for cirrhosis detection 1

Discordant results between different scoring systems require imaging confirmation or liver biopsy 1

Serial monitoring: Repeat FIB-4 every 1-2 years in high-risk patients (prediabetes, type 2 diabetes, metabolic risk factors) and every 2-3 years in lower-risk NAFLD patients 1

Prognostic Value

Elevated scores predict mortality risk: An ELF score >9.8 indicates high risk of liver-related mortality, with mortality risk increasing 16.69-fold for F3 fibrosis and 42.30-fold for F4 (cirrhosis) 3

Younger age with advanced fibrosis carries worse prognosis due to more years of life lost 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis and portal hypertension.

Current opinion in gastroenterology, 2024

Guideline

Life Expectancy with Advanced Liver Fibrosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Blood Tests for Age-Related Changes in Hepatic Function

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.