What is the incidence of radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) in patients undergoing breast or chest wall radiotherapy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 1, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Incidence of Radiation-Induced Lung Injury in Breast or Chest Wall Radiotherapy

The incidence of radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) in breast or chest wall radiotherapy is approximately 2.4% for symptomatic cases requiring intervention, with modern 3D conformal techniques demonstrating excellent pulmonary safety. 1

Specific Incidence Rates by Severity

  • Grade 2 RILI (moderate symptoms requiring medical intervention) occurs in approximately 0.9% of breast cancer patients (15/1565 cases in the CANTO-RT cohort) 1
  • Grade 3-4 RILI (severe toxicity) occurs in only 0.1% of breast cancer patients (2/1565 cases), with no fatal cases reported in modern series 1
  • Overall symptomatic RILI affects 2.4% of patients when using contemporary 3D conformal radiotherapy techniques 1
  • Among symptomatic patients, 39% experience grade 2 toxicity and only 6% experience grade 3-4 toxicity 1

Temporal Pattern of Injury

  • Acute radiation pneumonitis develops during treatment or 2-6 months after radiotherapy completion 2, 3
  • Radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis typically manifests 6-12 months following treatment completion 2

Critical Risk Factors That Increase Incidence

Pre-existing pulmonary disease is the most significant risk factor, increasing RILI risk by 3-fold (OR=3.05, p<0.01) 1. These patients require intensive counseling about their markedly elevated risk of severe and potentially lethal radiation pneumonitis 2.

Dosimetric parameters strongly predict RILI occurrence:

  • V30 Gy >15% increases RILI risk by 3-fold (OR=3.07, p=0.03) and should be used as a strict dose constraint 1
  • Each 1% increase in V30 Gy increases RILI risk by 6% (OR=1.06, p=0.04) 1
  • V20 of 35-37% or mean lung dose of 20-23 Gy represent upper safety limits, though 10-15% of patients still develop severe toxicity below these thresholds 2

Additional risk factors include:

  • Nodal radiotherapy increases RILI incidence 1
  • Concurrent chemotherapy use elevates risk 1
  • Higher tumor stage (pT and pN) correlates with increased RILI 1

Important Clinical Caveats

Approximately 45% of respiratory symptoms occurring after breast radiotherapy are NOT radiation-related but rather due to pulmonary infections, COPD exacerbations, heart failure, or other conditions 2, 3. This makes differential diagnosis critical before initiating immunosuppressive therapy.

Modern radiotherapy techniques have dramatically reduced RILI incidence. The 2.4% symptomatic RILI rate with 3D conformal RT represents a substantial improvement over historical rates, with 96% of patients in the CANTO-RT cohort treated with this technique 1.

Patients with pre-existing interstitial lung disease face disproportionately high risk and require detailed documentation in radiation planning, more intensive monitoring protocols, and explicit counseling about their elevated risk of severe complications 2, 1.

References

Guideline

Incidence and Risk Factors of Radiation-Induced Lung Injury

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Radiation Pneumonitis Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.