Initial Management of Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Immediately assess hemodynamic stability using shock index (heart rate divided by systolic blood pressure), place two large-bore IV catheters, begin aggressive crystalloid resuscitation, and determine whether the patient is stable or unstable to guide the diagnostic and therapeutic pathway. 1
Immediate Resuscitation and Stabilization
Hemodynamic Assessment
- Calculate shock index at presentation—a value >1 defines instability and mandates urgent intervention rather than routine endoscopy 1, 2
- Place at least two large-bore intravenous catheters to allow rapid volume expansion 1
- Initiate fluid resuscitation with crystalloids to restore and maintain hemodynamic stability 1
Transfusion Strategy
- Use restrictive transfusion thresholds with hemoglobin trigger of 70 g/L and target range of 70-90 g/L for most patients 1, 3, 2
- For patients with cardiovascular disease, use higher threshold with hemoglobin trigger of 80 g/L and target ≥100 g/L 1, 3, 2
Anticoagulation Reversal
- For patients on warfarin with unstable GI hemorrhage, interrupt warfarin immediately and reverse anticoagulation with prothrombin complex concentrate and vitamin K 1, 3, 2
- For patients with low thrombotic risk, restart warfarin 7 days after hemorrhage 1, 3, 2
Antiplatelet Management
- Permanently discontinue aspirin if used for primary prophylaxis 1, 3, 2
- Do not routinely stop aspirin for secondary prevention; if stopped, restart as soon as hemostasis is achieved 1, 3, 2
Diagnostic Pathway Based on Hemodynamic Status
For Hemodynamically UNSTABLE Patients (Shock Index >1)
The critical distinction here is that unstable patients require immediate bleeding localization before any therapeutic endoscopy.
- Perform CT angiography immediately to localize bleeding before any intervention—this is the fastest and least invasive means to identify the bleeding source 1, 3, 2
- Following positive CTA, proceed to catheter angiography with embolization within 60 minutes in centers with 24/7 interventional radiology 1, 3, 2
- Always consider an upper GI source even with hematochezia, as hemodynamic instability may indicate upper GI bleeding—failure to do so leads to delayed diagnosis and treatment 1, 2
- Perform immediate surgery only in patients with hemorrhagic shock who are non-responders to resuscitation and after failure of other localization methods 4, 1
For Hemodynamically STABLE Patients
Stable patients can proceed directly to endoscopy for both diagnosis and treatment.
- Perform upper and lower GI endoscopy as the initial diagnostic procedure for nearly all stable patients 4, 1
- For suspected upper GI bleeding, perform endoscopy within 24 hours of presentation after initial stabilization 1, 5, 6
- For suspected lower GI bleeding, perform colonoscopy within 24 hours after adequate bowel preparation 1, 7
Risk Stratification for Lower GI Bleeding
- Calculate the Oakland score (incorporating age, gender, previous LGIB, rectal exam findings, heart rate, systolic BP, and hemoglobin) 1, 3
- Patients with Oakland score ≤8 can be safely discharged for urgent outpatient investigation 3
- Patients with Oakland score >8 require hospital admission for colonoscopy 3
Medication Management During Initial Phase
Proton Pump Inhibitors
- Administer intravenous proton pump inhibitors in the acute setting for suspected non-variceal upper GI bleeding to decrease the probability of high-risk stigmata seen during endoscopy 5, 6
Prokinetic Agents
- Consider giving prokinetic agents (erythromycin) 30 minutes to one hour before endoscopy to aid in diagnosis of upper GI bleeding 5, 6
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Failing to consider an upper GI source in patients with hemodynamic instability and hematochezia—this is the most common diagnostic error 1, 3, 2
- Performing colonoscopy as the initial approach when shock index >1 or patient remains unstable after resuscitation—CTA should be performed first 3
- Delaying endoscopy beyond 24 hours in high-risk stable patients 1
- Using liberal transfusion strategies—mortality is generally related to comorbidity rather than exsanguination, with overall in-hospital mortality of 3.4% but rising to 20% in patients requiring ≥4 units of red cells 1, 3, 2
Laboratory Assessment
- Obtain complete blood count to determine hemoglobin and hematocrit levels 1
- Check coagulation studies including PT/INR to evaluate for coagulopathy 1
- Perform blood typing and cross-matching for patients with severe bleeding or hemodynamic instability 1
- Perform digital rectal examination to confirm blood in stool and exclude anorectal pathology 3, 2