What are the alternatives or generics to Dupixent (dupilumab)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 1, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Alternatives to Dupixent (Dupilumab)

For moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, tralokinumab is the first-line alternative to dupilumab, followed by JAK inhibitors (upadacitinib or abrocitinib) as second-line alternatives. 1

No Generic Available

  • Dupilumab is a biologic medication (monoclonal antibody) with no generic equivalent currently available 2
  • As a complex biologic, generic versions (biosimilars) are not yet on the market

First-Line Alternative: Tralokinumab

Tralokinumab should be your first choice when switching from dupilumab. 1

  • Targets IL-13 specifically (unlike dupilumab which blocks both IL-4 and IL-13) 1
  • Similar efficacy profile to dupilumab with potentially fewer side effects 1
  • Particularly valuable for patients with dupilumab-associated arthralgia—all 15 patients in a recent case series achieved resolution of joint pain after switching to tralokinumab while maintaining clear or nearly clear skin 3
  • Preferred option for females planning pregnancy over JAK inhibitors 1

Second-Line Alternatives: JAK Inhibitors

Upadacitinib

  • Oral selective JAK-1 inhibitor dosed at 15mg or 30mg daily 1
  • Superior efficacy to dupilumab in head-to-head trials—71.0% achieved EASI-75 at week 16 vs 61.1% with dupilumab (p=0.006) 4
  • More rapid onset: 43.7% achieved EASI-75 by week 2 vs 17.4% with dupilumab 4
  • Higher rate of complete clearance (EASI-100): 27.9% vs 7.6% with dupilumab 4

Abrocitinib

  • Oral selective JAK-1 inhibitor dosed at 100mg or 200mg daily 1
  • Demonstrated superior efficacy to dupilumab in head-to-head trials 1
  • May resolve dupilumab-related ocular surface disorders (DROSD)—limited data shows 2 of 3 patients had resolution of eye symptoms by 12 weeks after switching 5

Critical Safety Warnings for JAK Inhibitors

The FDA warns of increased risk of serious cardiovascular events, cancer, blood clots, and death with JAK inhibitors. 1

  • Requires baseline laboratory testing and regular monitoring 1
  • Higher rates of serious infection, eczema herpeticum, and herpes zoster compared to dupilumab 4
  • These risks must be weighed against the superior efficacy profile

Other Treatment Options

Phototherapy

  • Conditionally recommended for adults with atopic dermatitis (low certainty evidence) 1
  • Consider when biologics or JAK inhibitors are not appropriate

Baricitinib

  • JAK-1 and JAK-2 inhibitor approved in Europe but not FDA-approved for atopic dermatitis in the US 1
  • Less efficacy than upadacitinib and abrocitinib based on network meta-analysis 1

When to Switch from Dupilumab

Ocular Complications

Switch if any of the following occur: 5

  • Progressive conjunctival scarring not responding to treatment that risks visual acuity loss
  • Requirement for prolonged topical corticosteroids (>8 weeks) with risk of serious ocular adverse effects
  • Significant quality of life loss from inadequately controlled eye symptoms

Musculoskeletal Side Effects

  • Dupilumab-associated arthralgia, arthritis, or enthesitis warrant switching to tralokinumab 3
  • IL-4 inhibition may promote Th17-dominant immune response contributing to joint symptoms 3

Inadequate Response

  • Partial responders or non-durable responders should first maximize topical therapy and rule out alternative diagnoses before switching 6
  • Consider combination with traditional immunosuppressants before abandoning dupilumab entirely 6

Monitoring Requirements

  • JAK inhibitors: Baseline labs and regular monitoring required 1
  • Tralokinumab: Similar monitoring to dupilumab with assessment for treatment efficacy and adverse effects 1
  • Regular follow-up for all alternatives to assess disease control 1

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.