Arthralgias: Dupilumab vs Mepolizumab
Arthralgias are more common with dupilumab injections compared to mepolizumab, based on the most recent guideline evidence showing dupilumab lists arthralgia as a recognized adverse effect while mepolizumab has similar but less emphasized joint-related complications.
Comparative Incidence from Guidelines
Dupilumab-Associated Arthralgia
- Arthralgia is explicitly listed as an adverse effect of dupilumab in the 2024 European Respiratory Journal guidelines, alongside diarrhea, parasitic infections, dizziness, insomnia, thrombosis, skin rash, local reaction, and anaphylaxis 1
- The pooled prevalence of joint pain among dupilumab patients is 1.74% (95% CI: 1.12-2.68) across 15,101 patients in a 2025 meta-analysis 2
- Inflammatory arthropathy specifically occurs in 2.62% (95% CI: 1.44-4.70) of dupilumab patients 2
- Joint symptoms typically develop within 4 months of initiating dupilumab, presenting as peripheral, generalized, and symmetric arthritis 3
Mepolizumab-Associated Arthralgia
- Arthralgia is listed among mepolizumab's adverse effects in the same 2024 guideline, along with local reaction, eczema, headache, diarrhea, fatigue, herpes zoster, angioedema, and anaphylaxis 1
- The guideline presents both medications in equivalent formatting, suggesting comparable recognition of this adverse effect 1
Clinical Characteristics of Dupilumab-Associated Arthralgia
Presentation Pattern
- Symptoms are most commonly peripheral, generalized, and symmetric in distribution 3
- Onset occurs generally within 4 months following dupilumab initiation 3
- Joint involvement includes fingers, wrists, ankles, knees, with swelling, tenderness, and morning stiffness lasting over 2 hours 4
- Symptoms may be refractory to NSAIDs and corticosteroids in some cases 4
Proposed Mechanism
- Suppression of IL-4 may lead to increased IL-17 activity, a prominent cytokine in inflammatory arthritis, explaining the paradoxical joint symptoms 3
- This mechanism is unique to dupilumab's dual IL-4/IL-13 blockade, whereas mepolizumab targets IL-5 and would not be expected to have the same immunologic shift 3
Management Algorithm for Dupilumab-Associated Arthralgia
Mild Disease (Minimal Functional Impairment)
- Continue dupilumab and treat through symptoms with NSAIDs or short-term corticosteroids 3
- Monitor for progression at each follow-up visit 3
Moderate-to-Severe Disease (Significant Functional Impairment)
- Discontinue dupilumab immediately if symptoms are severe or refractory to symptomatic treatment 3
- Switch to tralokinumab (IL-13-specific inhibitor) as first alternative—all 15 patients in a 2025 case series achieved resolution of arthralgia without recurrence while maintaining AD control 5
- Consider JAK inhibitors (upadacitinib) as second alternative if tralokinumab is unavailable or ineffective, as this successfully treated refractory dupilumab-induced inflammatory arthritis in published cases 4, 3
Resolution Timeline
- Most patients experience full resolution within weeks following dupilumab discontinuation 3
- Symptoms may persist for up to 12 weeks in some cases even after stopping dupilumab 4
Critical Clinical Pitfalls
Diagnostic Considerations
- Obtain inflammatory markers (ESR, CRP) and autoimmune serologies (RF, anti-CCP, ANA, HLA-B27) to rule out underlying rheumatologic disease 4
- Dupilumab-associated arthritis typically presents with negative autoimmune serologies 4
- Do not assume all joint pain in dupilumab patients is drug-related—evaluate for alternative etiologies 2
Important Caveat
- The 2025 meta-analysis found no statistically significant increased risk of joint pain with dupilumab compared to controls (RR 0.68,95% CI: 0.29-1.58, P=0.31), suggesting the absolute risk may be lower than case reports suggest 2
- However, the clinical significance of symptomatic arthralgia when it does occur warrants proactive surveillance regardless of statistical significance 2
Tralokinumab as Preferred Alternative
- Tralokinumab selectively inhibits IL-13 only, avoiding the IL-4 blockade that may trigger the Th17-dominant response responsible for arthralgia 5
- This makes it the mechanistically superior choice for patients who develop dupilumab-associated joint symptoms while still requiring biologic therapy for AD 5