Are arthralgias more common with mepolizumab (Mepolizumab) or dupilumab (Dupilumab) injections?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Arthralgias: Dupilumab vs Mepolizumab

Arthralgias are more common with dupilumab injections compared to mepolizumab, based on the most recent guideline evidence showing dupilumab lists arthralgia as a recognized adverse effect while mepolizumab has similar but less emphasized joint-related complications.

Comparative Incidence from Guidelines

Dupilumab-Associated Arthralgia

  • Arthralgia is explicitly listed as an adverse effect of dupilumab in the 2024 European Respiratory Journal guidelines, alongside diarrhea, parasitic infections, dizziness, insomnia, thrombosis, skin rash, local reaction, and anaphylaxis 1
  • The pooled prevalence of joint pain among dupilumab patients is 1.74% (95% CI: 1.12-2.68) across 15,101 patients in a 2025 meta-analysis 2
  • Inflammatory arthropathy specifically occurs in 2.62% (95% CI: 1.44-4.70) of dupilumab patients 2
  • Joint symptoms typically develop within 4 months of initiating dupilumab, presenting as peripheral, generalized, and symmetric arthritis 3

Mepolizumab-Associated Arthralgia

  • Arthralgia is listed among mepolizumab's adverse effects in the same 2024 guideline, along with local reaction, eczema, headache, diarrhea, fatigue, herpes zoster, angioedema, and anaphylaxis 1
  • The guideline presents both medications in equivalent formatting, suggesting comparable recognition of this adverse effect 1

Clinical Characteristics of Dupilumab-Associated Arthralgia

Presentation Pattern

  • Symptoms are most commonly peripheral, generalized, and symmetric in distribution 3
  • Onset occurs generally within 4 months following dupilumab initiation 3
  • Joint involvement includes fingers, wrists, ankles, knees, with swelling, tenderness, and morning stiffness lasting over 2 hours 4
  • Symptoms may be refractory to NSAIDs and corticosteroids in some cases 4

Proposed Mechanism

  • Suppression of IL-4 may lead to increased IL-17 activity, a prominent cytokine in inflammatory arthritis, explaining the paradoxical joint symptoms 3
  • This mechanism is unique to dupilumab's dual IL-4/IL-13 blockade, whereas mepolizumab targets IL-5 and would not be expected to have the same immunologic shift 3

Management Algorithm for Dupilumab-Associated Arthralgia

Mild Disease (Minimal Functional Impairment)

  • Continue dupilumab and treat through symptoms with NSAIDs or short-term corticosteroids 3
  • Monitor for progression at each follow-up visit 3

Moderate-to-Severe Disease (Significant Functional Impairment)

  • Discontinue dupilumab immediately if symptoms are severe or refractory to symptomatic treatment 3
  • Switch to tralokinumab (IL-13-specific inhibitor) as first alternative—all 15 patients in a 2025 case series achieved resolution of arthralgia without recurrence while maintaining AD control 5
  • Consider JAK inhibitors (upadacitinib) as second alternative if tralokinumab is unavailable or ineffective, as this successfully treated refractory dupilumab-induced inflammatory arthritis in published cases 4, 3

Resolution Timeline

  • Most patients experience full resolution within weeks following dupilumab discontinuation 3
  • Symptoms may persist for up to 12 weeks in some cases even after stopping dupilumab 4

Critical Clinical Pitfalls

Diagnostic Considerations

  • Obtain inflammatory markers (ESR, CRP) and autoimmune serologies (RF, anti-CCP, ANA, HLA-B27) to rule out underlying rheumatologic disease 4
  • Dupilumab-associated arthritis typically presents with negative autoimmune serologies 4
  • Do not assume all joint pain in dupilumab patients is drug-related—evaluate for alternative etiologies 2

Important Caveat

  • The 2025 meta-analysis found no statistically significant increased risk of joint pain with dupilumab compared to controls (RR 0.68,95% CI: 0.29-1.58, P=0.31), suggesting the absolute risk may be lower than case reports suggest 2
  • However, the clinical significance of symptomatic arthralgia when it does occur warrants proactive surveillance regardless of statistical significance 2

Tralokinumab as Preferred Alternative

  • Tralokinumab selectively inhibits IL-13 only, avoiding the IL-4 blockade that may trigger the Th17-dominant response responsible for arthralgia 5
  • This makes it the mechanistically superior choice for patients who develop dupilumab-associated joint symptoms while still requiring biologic therapy for AD 5

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.