Does a patient receiving rituximab (Rituxan) intravenously need Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

PJP Prophylaxis for Patients Receiving Rituximab

Yes, patients receiving rituximab intravenously require PJP prophylaxis, particularly during treatment and for at least 6 months following the last dose. 1

Guideline-Based Recommendations

FDA-Approved Indications for Prophylaxis

The FDA label for rituximab explicitly states that PCP prophylaxis is recommended for patients with GPA (granulomatosis with polyangiitis) and MPA (microscopic polyangiitis) during treatment and for at least 6 months following the last rituximab infusion. 1 Additionally, PCP prophylaxis should be considered for patients with pemphigus vulgaris during and following rituximab treatment. 1

Rheumatologic Disease Context

For patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (GPA/MPA) receiving rituximab or cyclophosphamide, the American College of Rheumatology conditionally recommends prophylaxis to prevent Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia. 2 This recommendation applies regardless of concomitant steroid dose when rituximab is used. 3

High-Risk Scenarios Requiring Prophylaxis

Concomitant cyclophosphamide or rituximab use mandates prophylaxis regardless of steroid dose. 3 The mechanism involves profound B-cell depletion that occurs with any therapeutic rituximab dose and persists for 6-12 months. 3

Dose-Independent Risk

All Therapeutic Doses Carry Risk

Even lower doses of rituximab, such as 50 mg/m² weekly for 4 weeks, can produce profound B-cell depletion, increasing the risk of PJP. 3 Standard lymphoma dosing (375 mg/m² weekly for 4 weeks) and rheumatologic dosing (1000 mg repeated on day 15) both carry significant PJP risk. 3

Common Pitfall to Avoid

Do not wait for high rituximab doses to initiate prophylaxis, as even reduced doses can cause profound B-cell depletion. 3 This is a critical error that can lead to preventable PJP infections.

Duration of Prophylaxis

Minimum Duration

Continue prophylaxis for a minimum of 6 months after the last rituximab dose. 3, 1 However, HBV reactivation data suggests that rituximab's immunosuppressive effects may persist up to 1-2 years after the last dose. 2

Extended Duration Considerations

Consider prolonged prophylaxis duration in patients who:

  • Receive repeated rituximab infusions 3
  • Have structural lung disease 3
  • Require continuous immunosuppressive therapy 3
  • Develop hypogammaglobulinemia 3

Measure IgG levels at baseline and every 6 months in patients treated with rituximab, as low baseline IgG may predict higher risk of secondary immunodeficiency and justify more prolonged prophylaxis. 3

Preferred Prophylactic Agent

First-Line Choice

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is the preferred prophylactic agent, providing a 91% reduction in PJP occurrence and an 83% reduction in PJP-related mortality. 3 TMP-SMX offers additional protection against common bacterial infections, listeriosis, nocardiosis, and toxoplasmosis. 3

Important Drug Interaction

Monitor carefully when using TMP-SMX with methotrexate, as this combination increases the risk of severe cytopenia. 3 The American College of Rheumatology specifically warns about this potentially dangerous interaction. 3

Alternative Agents

When TMP-SMX cannot be used:

  • Atovaquone 1500 mg daily is the first-line alternative 4
  • Dapsone 100 mg daily requires G6PD testing and monitoring for methemoglobinemia 4
  • Aerosolized pentamidine 300 mg monthly requires monthly healthcare visits 4

Evidence Supporting Prophylaxis

Efficacy Data

The most recent high-quality study demonstrated that TMP-SMX prophylaxis significantly reduces PJP incidence with an adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio of 0.20 (95% CI, 0.10-0.42) in patients receiving rituximab. 5 During TMP-SMX administration, only one PJP infection occurred (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.01 [0.003-0.16]). 5

Risk-Benefit Analysis

The number needed to treat to prevent one PJP infection was 32 (24.8-39.4), while the number needed to harm based on severe adverse drug reactions was 101 (61.9-261.1). 5 This favorable risk-benefit ratio supports routine prophylaxis.

Mortality Without Prophylaxis

PJP carries a mortality rate of 27.2% to 63.6% in patients receiving rituximab. 5, 6 The clinical course can be fulminant, with 88% developing acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and 53% requiring ICU admission. 7

Special Consideration: Concomitant High-Dose Glucocorticoids

For patients receiving rituximab with concomitant high-dose glucocorticoids (≥30 mg/day prednisone or equivalent for 4 weeks), the benefit of prophylaxis is particularly compelling. 6 In this subgroup, the PJP incidence was 7.93 per 100 person-years compared to 0.40 per 100 person-years without high-dose glucocorticoids. 6 The number needed to treat fell to just 20 (10.7-65.7) in this high-risk population. 6

Rituximab Monotherapy

Even patients receiving rituximab monotherapy for ANCA-associated vasculitis should receive prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole during treatment and for at least 6 months after the last dose. 3 The risk remains elevated due to the profound and prolonged B-cell depletion that occurs regardless of other immunosuppressive agents.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

PJP Prophylaxis Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Atovaquone for PJP Prophylaxis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.