What are the risks and complications associated with bolster use and how can they be minimized?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 8, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Bolster-Specific Risks and Complications

The primary risks of bolster use include pressure necrosis from excessive compression, inadequate padding over bony prominences, assessment difficulties with non-transparent materials, and stitch/staple-related skin damage—however, modern evidence suggests that bolsters may be unnecessary for most small to medium facial grafts, thereby eliminating these risks entirely. 1

Key Complications and Risk Factors

Pressure Necrosis and Excessive Compression

  • Excessive compression from bolster sutures can compromise blood flow to the overlying skin flap, leading to ischemia and necrosis. 2
  • The risk is particularly high when bolsters are placed directly over the graft or framework rather than at a distance from critical structures. 2
  • One case series reported congestion at the conchal portion due to excessive thinning combined with bolster pressure, though no frank necrosis occurred. 2

Inadequate Padding Over Bony Prominences

  • Bony prominences (nasal dorsum, auricular cartilage, periorbital rim) are especially vulnerable to pressure-related injury when bolsters are applied without sufficient cushioning. 3
  • Foam bolsters provide superior conformity to irregular facial contours compared to traditional gauze, reducing focal pressure points. 3

Assessment Difficulties

  • Non-transparent bolster materials prevent visual inspection of the graft during the critical early healing period (first 5-7 days). 4
  • This limitation delays detection of hematoma formation, graft displacement, or early signs of infection. 4
  • Traditional tie-over bolsters require removal for assessment, which itself risks graft disruption. 5

Stitch and Staple-Related Trauma

  • Circumferential tie-over sutures can create linear pressure points that damage both the graft edges and surrounding normal skin. 4
  • Staple removal is often painful and may cause minor skin tears at exit sites. 1

Evidence-Based Risk Minimization Strategy

Consider Eliminating Bolsters Entirely

  • For small to medium full-thickness skin grafts (10-55mm diameter) on the face, scalp, ear, and nose, bolsters are unnecessary and can be safely omitted. 1
  • A 96-patient series demonstrated 98% complete graft take without bolsters, using only circumferential resorbable sutures with Mepitel™ and Steri-Strips™. 1
  • A separate 30-patient series achieved 100% ultimate graft take without bolsters or basting sutures, with only two cases of early superficial necrosis that healed completely. 5
  • This approach eliminates all bolster-related complications while saving operative time and reducing patient discomfort. 1

When Bolsters Are Used

Modified Bolster Placement Technique:

  • Place bolsters distant from the graft framework in a zigzag pattern rather than directly over the graft. 2
  • This allows the overlying skin to remain relaxed with adequate blood flow while still providing immobilization. 2
  • Seven microtia reconstructions using this distant bolster technique had no hematomas or skin necrosis. 2

Material Selection:

  • Use foam bolsters rather than gauze for facial grafts to conform better to irregular contours and distribute pressure evenly. 3
  • Foam bolsters demonstrated consistently excellent results with low complication rates in 60 facial reconstruction cases. 3

Monitoring Strategy:

  • For heavily exuding wounds, plan more frequent dressing changes (every 24-48 hours) rather than the traditional 5-7 day bolster retention. 4
  • Consider transparent or semi-transparent bolster materials when visual monitoring is critical. 4

Clinical Decision Algorithm

For grafts ≤55mm on head and neck: Omit bolsters entirely; use circumferential resorbable sutures with non-adherent dressing. 1

For larger grafts or high-movement areas: The literature shows equivalence between tie-over bolsters and quilting sutures, with no demonstrated superiority of bolsters. 4

If bolsters are chosen: Use foam material, place distant from graft edges in zigzag pattern, and ensure adequate padding over any bony prominences. 2, 3

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Avoid placing bolsters directly over thin skin flaps or recently elevated tissue—this concentrates pressure and compromises perfusion. 2
  • Do not tie bolster sutures too tightly—the goal is gentle approximation, not compression. 2
  • Avoid prolonged bolster retention (>7 days) in exudative wounds—this creates a closed environment for bacterial proliferation and prevents assessment. 4
  • Do not assume bolsters are mandatory—the strongest recent evidence challenges this traditional teaching for most facial grafts. 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.