What are the diagnostic criteria for Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 9, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnostic Criteria for Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS)

APS diagnosis requires BOTH a clinical criterion (thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity) AND persistent laboratory positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies confirmed on two separate occasions at least 12 weeks apart. 1

Laboratory Criteria

You must test for all three antibodies simultaneously, preferably on the same sample 1:

Required Tests

  • Lupus anticoagulant (LAC) - detected using functional coagulation assays with a 3-step methodology: screening, mixing, and confirmation 2

    • Must use BOTH activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) AND dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) in parallel 2
    • Omitting either APTT or dRVVT increases risk of missing the diagnosis in up to 55% of triple-positive patients 2, 3
    • Report as positive or negative with warnings about potential interferences 2
  • Anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) - IgG and IgM isotypes measured by solid phase assays (ELISA or automated systems) 1

    • Must be present at levels higher than the 99th percentile of normal controls 1
    • Results should be reported with their quantitative level 2
  • Anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI) - IgG and IgM isotypes measured by solid phase assays 1

    • Must be present at levels higher than the 99th percentile of normal controls 1
    • Results should be reported with their quantitative level 2

Confirmation Requirements

  • All positive tests must be confirmed after at least 12 weeks to distinguish persistent from transient antibody positivity and avoid over-diagnosis 1, 2
  • This 12-week confirmation requirement applies exclusively to positive test results, not negative ones 1
  • Two consecutive positive tests are mandatory before making the diagnosis 2, 3

Clinical Criteria (Must Have at Least One)

  • Vascular thrombosis: One or more episodes of arterial, venous, or small vessel thrombosis in any tissue or organ 4, 5
  • Pregnancy morbidity: Including unexplained fetal death ≥10 weeks gestation, premature birth <34 weeks due to eclampsia/preeclampsia/placental insufficiency, or three or more unexplained consecutive spontaneous abortions <10 weeks gestation 4, 5

Risk Stratification Based on Antibody Profile

The antibody profile determines thrombotic risk and guides management intensity 2, 3:

  • Triple positivity (LAC + aCL + aβ2GPI) - highest thrombotic risk and strongest association with clinical events 1, 3
  • Double positivity (aCL + aβ2GPI with concordant isotype) - significantly increases diagnostic confidence 2
  • IgG isotype - clinically more relevant than IgM 2, 3
  • Medium/high titers (>40 Units) - more clinically significant than low positive results 3
  • Single positivity - lower thrombotic risk, particularly if only IgM 2

Critical Testing Considerations and Pitfalls

Anticoagulation Interference

  • LAC testing is unreliable during anticoagulation but sometimes clinically necessary 2, 3
  • For patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), use pretest DOAC removal procedures 2, 3
  • For patients on vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), use Taipan snake venom time/ecarin time (TSVT/ET), though sensitivity is not 100% 2
  • Ideally, assess LAC 1-2 weeks after discontinuing VKA (with or without bridging to LMWH) 2
  • Heparin also interferes with LAC testing 1

False Negative Results - When to Retest

Retest negative results if 1:

  • Initial testing was performed during anticoagulation therapy
  • Testing occurred during acute thrombosis (antibodies may deposit at thrombotic site, lowering serum levels) 1
  • Testing was done during pregnancy (Factor VIII increases can mask lupus anticoagulant by shortening APTT) 1
  • Strong clinical suspicion persists despite negative standard testing 1

Assay Variability

  • Low positive or equivocal results near the cutoff should be repeated, as assay imprecision can reach 10% 1, 2
  • Significant inter-assay and inter-laboratory variability exists, particularly for solid-phase assays 1, 6
  • Lack of universal calibrators or standards contributes to high variability between different solid-phase assays 6

Emerging Biomarkers (Not Yet Diagnostic Criteria)

  • β2GPI domain I antibodies (aD1) - strongly associated with thrombosis in triple-positive patients; currently used for risk confirmation rather than diagnosis 1
  • Antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) - may be considered when standard tests are negative but clinical suspicion remains high 1, 3
  • IgA isotypes - significance remains controversial and not included in current diagnostic criteria 1

Updated 2023 ACR/EULAR Criteria

The 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria maintain the same laboratory parameters but replaced the 99th percentile cutoff with specific titer thresholds 1:

  • Moderate titer: 40 Units
  • High titer: 80 Units

Note: Classification criteria (designed for research) are stricter than diagnostic criteria used in clinical practice - inappropriate application of classification criteria may lead to misdiagnosis or underdiagnosis 2

References

Guideline

Diagnostic Criteria for Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Testing for Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Antiphospholipid Syndrome Diagnosis and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

The antiphospholipid syndrome: from pathophysiology to treatment.

Clinical and experimental medicine, 2017

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.