What is the interpretation and management for a patient with abnormal pulmonary function test results, including decreased Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Interpretation of Pulmonary Function Test Results

This patient demonstrates a mixed ventilatory defect with evidence of both obstruction and restriction, characterized by reduced FEV1/FVC ratio (75-76%, below the 5th percentile threshold), reduced TLC (84% predicted on the second test), and reduced FVC and FEV1 values. 1

Pattern Recognition and Classification

Primary Abnormality: Mixed Ventilatory Defect

The key diagnostic features are:

  • FEV1/FVC ratio of 75-76% falls below the normal threshold (typically <70% or below 5th percentile indicates obstruction) 1
  • TLC reduced to 84% predicted (below 5th percentile threshold for restriction) on the second test, though initially normal at 108% 1
  • Both FEV1 and FVC are proportionally reduced (68-76% predicted range) 1

A mixed ventilatory defect is characterized by the coexistence of obstruction (low FEV1/FVC) and restriction (low TLC), which is precisely what this patient demonstrates on the second test. 1

Evidence of Air Trapping and Small Airway Disease

Additional concerning features include:

  • Elevated RV/TLC ratio (82-88%, above normal limits) indicates air trapping 1, 2
  • FEF25-75 values (79-85% predicted) suggest small airway involvement 1, 2
  • The pattern of reduced FVC with borderline FEV1/FVC ratio may reflect patchy collapse of small airways early in exhalation 1, 2

Severity Assessment

The severity is classified as moderate based on FEV1 of 68-76% predicted. 1

According to established severity grading:

  • Moderate obstruction: FEV1 60-69% predicted 1
  • This patient's FEV1 ranges from 68-76%, placing them in the moderate category 1

Temporal Changes Between Tests

Comparing the two test dates reveals:

  • TLC declined from 108% to 84% predicted - a significant restrictive component developed 1
  • FVC improved from 68% to 76% predicted 1
  • FEV1 improved from 69% to 76% predicted 1
  • RV/TLC ratio improved from 88% to 82% but remains elevated 1

This pattern suggests evolving disease with development of a restrictive component, though some obstructive parameters improved. 1

Management Recommendations

Immediate Diagnostic Steps

Bronchodilator testing is essential to assess reversibility, as significant improvement (≥12% and ≥200 mL in FEV1 and/or FVC) would indicate reversible airflow obstruction and guide treatment. 1

  • Administer salbutamol in four separate 100 mcg doses through a spacer 1
  • Reassess lung function after 15 minutes 1
  • Even without FEV1/FVC improvement, decreased dyspnea may correlate with improved inspiratory capacity or reduced hyperinflation 1

Additional Testing Required

DLCO measurement is critical for further characterization, as it helps differentiate between parenchymal disease, emphysema, and other causes of mixed defects. 1, 3

  • Low DLCO with obstruction suggests emphysema 1
  • Low DLCO with restriction suggests interstitial lung disease 3
  • DLCO is an important predictor of mortality in both general population and specific disease states 1

Clinical Context Integration

The interpretation must be integrated with clinical history, particularly:

  • Smoking history (current or former smoker status) 1
  • Occupational exposures 1
  • Respiratory symptoms (dyspnea, cough, wheezing) 1
  • Chest radiograph findings 1
  • Recent hemoglobin values (affects DLCO interpretation) 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not rely solely on FEV1/FVC ratio to determine severity - both FEV1 and VC may decline with disease progression, and a ratio of 0.5/1.0 indicates more impairment than 2.0/4.0 despite identical ratios. 1

The lack of bronchodilator response in the laboratory does not preclude clinical response to bronchodilator therapy, so a 1-8 week clinical trial with bronchodilator medication should still be considered. 1

Single-breath VA measurements (from DLCO testing) systematically underestimate TLC and should not be used to diagnose restriction, as they can underestimate TLC by up to 3 L in severe obstruction. 1

Therapeutic Approach

Based on the mixed pattern with air trapping:

  • Initiate bronchodilator therapy (long-acting beta-agonists and/or anticholinergics) regardless of acute bronchodilator response 1
  • Address the restrictive component based on underlying etiology identified through clinical correlation and DLCO results 3
  • Monitor for progression with serial PFTs, as the development of restriction (TLC decline from 108% to 84%) suggests evolving disease 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Interpreting Normal Spirometry with Air Trapping on Flow Volume Loop

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.