What are the findings and recommendations of the SEPSISPAM trial regarding the treatment of sepsis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

SEPSISPAM Trial Summary

Primary Findings

The SEPSISPAM trial demonstrated that targeting a higher mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 80-85 mmHg compared to the standard 65-70 mmHg in patients with septic shock did not result in significant differences in mortality at either 28 or 90 days. 1

Study Design and Population

The SEPSISPAM trial was a randomized controlled trial examining high versus low MAP goals in patients with septic shock undergoing resuscitation 1. The trial enrolled 776 mechanically ventilated and sedated patients with septic shock across multiple centers 2.

Key Outcomes

Mortality

  • No significant difference in 28-day mortality between high-target (80-85 mmHg) and low-target (65-70 mmHg) MAP groups 1
  • No significant difference in 90-day mortality between groups 1

Subgroup Analysis: Chronic Hypertension

  • Patients with a history of chronic hypertension showed potential benefit from higher MAP targets, particularly in reducing acute kidney injury 3
  • Among chronic hypertensive patients with pre-ICU exposure to angiotensin II receptor blockers, the high MAP target group had significantly less severe acute kidney injury (adjusted OR 0.24,95% CI 0.09-0.66, p=0.006) 3
  • 297 chronic hypertensive patients were analyzed in this post-hoc analysis 3

Neurological Effects

  • Patients in the high-target MAP group (80-85 mmHg) demonstrated significantly higher arousal levels compared to the low-target group (65-70 mmHg) 2
  • Maximal Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS) scores were significantly higher in the high-target group at days 2,4, and 5, despite similar cumulative sedative drug doses 2
  • This suggests improved cerebral perfusion with higher MAP targets 2

Clinical Implications

General Septic Shock Population

  • The standard MAP target of 65 mmHg remains appropriate for most patients with septic shock, as higher targets do not improve overall mortality 1
  • This finding has been incorporated into major sepsis guidelines, including the 2016 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines 1

Special Populations Requiring Consideration

  • Patients with chronic hypertension, particularly those on angiotensin II receptor blockers, may benefit from higher MAP targets (80-85 mmHg) to reduce acute kidney injury risk 3
  • Patients requiring improved arousal and cerebral perfusion may benefit from higher MAP targets 2

Integration with Current Guidelines

The SEPSISPAM trial results directly influenced the 2016 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, which recommend a MAP goal of ≥65 mmHg during initial resuscitation 1. The trial provided evidence that routine targeting of higher MAP does not improve outcomes in unselected populations 1, though individualization based on chronic hypertension history remains a consideration 3.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.