Management of Pemphigus Flare in Patient with History of Prostate Cancer
Restart immunosuppressive therapy with rituximab plus short-term prednisolone as the optimal first-line approach for this pemphigus flare, given the patient's history of cancer and previous immunosuppressant exposure. 1
Rationale for Rituximab-Based Therapy
Rituximab combined with prednisolone (0.5-1 mg/kg/day) achieves 89% complete remission rates at 2 years and represents the most effective evidence-based treatment for pemphigus vulgaris flares. 1, 2 This approach is particularly appropriate for your patient because:
- The patient has already failed or required a break from conventional immunosuppressants (azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil) one year ago, making rituximab the logical next step 3
- The history of prostate cancer (now cured) makes rituximab preferable to long-term high-dose steroids or continuous conventional immunosuppressants, as it offers sustained remission with less cumulative immunosuppression 1, 2
- Clinical improvement typically begins within 6 weeks, with complete healing averaging 15 weeks 1, 2
Specific Treatment Protocol
Initial Phase (Weeks 1-4)
- Administer rituximab 1000 mg intravenously at weeks 1 and 3 (pemphigus protocol, not the older rheumatoid arthritis protocol) 2
- Start prednisolone 0.5-1 mg/kg/day orally, adjusting based on disease severity 3, 2
- If the patient is still on low-dose steroids, increase to the therapeutic range above 3
Steroid Tapering (After Disease Control)
- Begin tapering prednisolone once no new lesions appear and existing lesions heal (typically after 4-8 weeks) 3
- Reduce by 5-10 mg weekly initially, then more slowly below 20 mg daily 3
- Taper over at least 4 weeks minimum 3
Pre-Treatment Screening (Critical)
- Perform hepatitis B screening before rituximab initiation, as reactivation can be fatal 2
- Obtain chest radiograph to evaluate for active or latent tuberculosis 2
- Consider PCP prophylaxis during and following rituximab treatment, particularly given the combination with steroids 2
Alternative Approach if Rituximab is Unavailable or Contraindicated
If rituximab cannot be used immediately, restart conventional immunosuppression with either mycophenolate mofetil (2 g/day) or azathioprine (2-2.5 mg/kg/day) combined with prednisolone 3:
- Mycophenolate mofetil 2 g/day plus prednisolone is preferred if the patient previously used azathioprine 3, 4
- Start prednisolone at 40-60 mg/day for mild-moderate flares or 60-100 mg/day for severe flares 3
- If no response within 5-7 days, increase prednisolone by 50-100% increments 3
However, this conventional approach has lower long-term remission rates (10% sustained remission with mycophenolate mofetil vs. 40% with rituximab at 52 weeks) 1, making it a less optimal choice.
Management of Refractory Disease
If the patient fails to respond adequately to rituximab plus steroids within 6-8 weeks, add immunoadsorption 5, 2:
- Immunoadsorption removes circulating pathogenic antibodies rapidly, providing up to 95% reduction in desmoglein antibodies over 3 consecutive days 5, 6
- This combination addresses both immediate antibody removal (immunoadsorption) and prevention of new antibody formation (rituximab) 5, 7, 6
- The protocol involves daily immunoadsorption initially at 3-week intervals, then 4-week intervals until 90% healing 6
Monitoring and Follow-Up
Short-Term (First 6 Months)
- Assess for clinical improvement within 6 weeks; expect complete healing by 15 weeks on average 1, 2
- Monitor for infections closely, particularly if combining multiple immunosuppressants 2, 6
- Check complete blood count, liver and kidney function regularly 3
Long-Term (Beyond 6 Months)
- Expect potential relapse in 40-65% of patients, typically occurring 13-17 months after rituximab 1, 2
- Mean time to disease control is 11 months, with remission achieved at 58 months on average 2
- Continue surveillance even after apparent remission, as relapses can occur years later 3
Critical Caveats Regarding Cancer History
The history of treated prostate cancer does not contraindicate rituximab or immunosuppressive therapy, but requires consideration:
- Rituximab's targeted B-cell depletion offers a more favorable risk profile than prolonged high-dose steroids or continuous conventional immunosuppressants 1, 8
- Avoid unnecessarily prolonged or high-dose conventional immunosuppression (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil) given the theoretical oncogenic risks 3
- Coordinate with the patient's oncologist regarding timing and monitoring, though current evidence does not show increased cancer recurrence with rituximab in this setting 8
What NOT to Do
Do not simply increase the current low-dose steroid without adding definitive immunosuppression - this will likely fail to control the flare and expose the patient to prolonged steroid toxicity 3, 8
Do not restart the same immunosuppressant that was used a year ago without considering rituximab first - the patient has already demonstrated inadequate long-term control with that approach 3, 1
Do not delay treatment waiting for "perfect" conditions - pemphigus flares can progress rapidly and early aggressive treatment improves outcomes 3, 6