What immunotherapy regimen is indicated for stage 4 melanoma with metastases (Mets) limited to the lungs after complete surgical resection of the primary tumor?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Adjuvant Immunotherapy for Completely Resected Stage IV Melanoma with Lung-Only Metastases

For stage 4 melanoma with lung-only metastases after complete surgical resection, nivolumab monotherapy (240 mg IV every 2 weeks or 480 mg IV every 4 weeks for 1 year) is the preferred adjuvant immunotherapy regimen, with combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab as an alternative offering superior recurrence-free survival but substantially higher toxicity. 1

Primary Treatment Algorithm

First-Line Recommendation: Nivolumab Monotherapy

  • Nivolumab 240 mg IV every 2 weeks OR 480 mg IV every 4 weeks for up to 1 year is the standard adjuvant approach for resected stage IV melanoma with M1a disease (lung metastases only). 1, 2
  • The CheckMate 238 trial demonstrated clear benefit in resected stage IV melanoma, with a hazard ratio for recurrence-free survival of 0.63 for patients with M1a or M1b disease (compared to 1.00 for M1c disease). 1
  • This represents moderate-quality evidence as stage IV patients were a subset of the overall trial population. 1

Alternative Option: Combination Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab

  • Nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks for up to 1 year offers superior efficacy but with significantly increased toxicity. 1
  • The IMMUNED trial (phase II, 167 patients with resected stage IV disease) showed combination therapy had superior recurrence-free survival versus nivolumab alone (HR 0.40,95% CI 0.22-0.73) and versus placebo (HR 0.23,95% CI 0.13-0.41). 1
  • However, grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 71% with combination versus 27% with nivolumab monotherapy in IMMUNED. 1
  • The larger CheckMate 915 trial (245 stage IV patients) showed NO significant difference between combination and nivolumab monotherapy (HR 0.88,95% CI 0.58-1.32), though this used a different dosing schedule. 1, 3

Third Option: Pembrolizumab Monotherapy

  • Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks for 1 year is an acceptable alternative to nivolumab, though evidence in resected stage IV disease is less robust (low-quality evidence). 1
  • Pembrolizumab demonstrated efficacy in stage III disease but was not specifically studied in stage IV resected melanoma trials. 1, 4

What NOT to Use

BRAF/MEK Inhibitors Are NOT Indicated

  • Dabrafenib plus trametinib should ONLY be considered if there is a contraindication to immunotherapy in patients with BRAF V600E/K mutations. 1
  • This is Level V evidence with Strength C recommendation from ESMO, as no prospective trials included resected stage IV patients. 1
  • For triple wild-type melanoma (no BRAF mutation), targeted therapy is explicitly NOT recommended and will not work. 5

Single-Agent Ipilimumab Is Obsolete

  • Do not use ipilimumab monotherapy as it has inferior efficacy and substantially higher toxicity compared to anti-PD-1 therapy. 5, 2
  • CheckMate 238 showed nivolumab was superior to ipilimumab with 12-month recurrence-free survival of 70.5% versus 60.8% (HR 0.65, P<0.001). 2

Observation Alone Is Inadequate

  • Do not simply observe after complete resection given the high recurrence risk and strong evidence supporting adjuvant therapy. 1, 5
  • Patients with resected stage IV melanoma have recurrence risk equal to or exceeding stage III disease, for which adjuvant therapy is clearly indicated. 1

Critical Decision-Making Framework

When to Choose Nivolumab Monotherapy (Preferred)

  • Lower toxicity profile: grade 3-4 adverse events in 14.4% versus 45.9% with ipilimumab and 32.6% with combination therapy. 3, 2
  • Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events: 9.7% with nivolumab versus 42.6% with ipilimumab. 2
  • Established efficacy specifically in M1a disease (lung metastases). 1

When to Consider Combination Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab

  • Younger patients with excellent performance status who can tolerate higher toxicity. 1
  • High-risk features suggesting aggressive biology (though specific criteria are not well-defined in guidelines). 1
  • Critical caveat: The conflicting results between IMMUNED (showing benefit) and CheckMate 915 (showing no benefit) create uncertainty about whether combination therapy truly offers advantage over monotherapy in stage IV disease. 1, 3

Timing and Duration

Treatment Initiation

  • Begin adjuvant therapy within 13 weeks of complete surgical resection, as this was the maximum allowed in pivotal trials. 6
  • Ensure complete staging confirms no residual disease before starting therapy. 5

Treatment Duration

  • Continue for 1 year (52 weeks) unless disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal occurs. 1, 7

Monitoring for Immune-Related Adverse Events

Essential Surveillance

  • Monitor for immune-related adverse events including colitis, hepatitis, pneumonitis, endocrinopathies, and dermatologic toxicities. 1, 5
  • Pembrolizumab and nivolumab significantly increase susceptibility to severe infections, particularly tuberculosis and bacterial infections, as PD-1 blockade impairs normal immune responses to pathogens. 5, 7
  • Management of toxicity should follow established algorithms for metastatic disease. 1

Toxicity Management Principles

  • If severe toxicity occurs requiring treatment discontinuation, do NOT restart immunotherapy or switch to alternative adjuvant therapy. 1
  • This is Level V evidence, Strength D recommendation, but reflects the risk-benefit balance in the adjuvant setting where many patients would never relapse. 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Do Not Delay Treatment

  • Starting adjuvant immunotherapy promptly after surgical recovery optimizes outcomes; do not unnecessarily delay beyond the 13-week window. 5, 6

Do Not Use Chemotherapy

  • Chemotherapy has no role in the adjuvant setting for resected stage IV melanoma and should only be considered for unresectable metastatic disease after immunotherapy failure. 8, 5

Do Not Ignore M1 Substage

  • The benefit of nivolumab was clear for M1a/M1b disease (HR 0.63) but not for M1c disease (HR 1.00), though lung-only metastases represent M1a disease where benefit is established. 1

Evidence Quality Summary

The recommendation for nivolumab monotherapy is based on:

  • Moderate-quality evidence from CheckMate 238 subset analysis (169 stage IV patients, 128 with M1a/M1b). 1, 2
  • ESMO consensus supporting adjuvant therapy for resected stage IV melanoma (Level V evidence, Strength C recommendation). 1
  • ASCO 2023 guidelines listing nivolumab as a reasonable option with moderate evidence quality for stage IV disease. 1

The combination approach has conflicting evidence:

  • Low-quality evidence from small phase II IMMUNED trial showing benefit. 1
  • Contradictory findings from CheckMate 915 showing no benefit over monotherapy. 1, 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Adjuvant Therapy of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab Alone in Patients With Resected Stage IIIB-D or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 915).

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023

Guideline

Adjuvant Therapy for Triple Wild-Type Melanoma with Resected Lung Metastases

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Adjuvant Therapy for Stage III Melanoma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Treatment for Stage 4 Triple Wild-Type Melanoma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.