What fluids are recommended for resuscitation in sepsis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Fluid Resuscitation in Sepsis

Crystalloids are the fluid of choice for sepsis resuscitation, with at least 30 mL/kg administered within the first 3 hours, preferably using balanced crystalloids (lactated Ringer's or Plasma-Lyte) over normal saline. 1

Initial Fluid Selection and Volume

Primary Fluid Choice

  • Crystalloids are strongly recommended as the initial and subsequent resuscitation fluid (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). 1
  • Balanced crystalloids (lactated Ringer's or Plasma-Lyte) should be preferred over normal saline when available to reduce the risk of hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis. 2
  • Either balanced crystalloids or saline may be used, though the evidence weakly favors balanced solutions. 1

Initial Volume Requirements

  • Administer at least 30 mL/kg of IV crystalloid within the first 3 hours of recognizing sepsis-induced hypoperfusion or elevated lactate (strong recommendation, low quality evidence). 1
  • More rapid administration and greater volumes may be needed in some patients based on clinical response. 1, 3
  • This represents a minimum threshold—not a maximum target—and should be adjusted based on hemodynamic response. 3

Fluid Challenge Technique

Administration Strategy

  • Continue fluid administration as long as hemodynamic parameters continue to improve using a fluid challenge technique (best practice statement). 1
  • Administer fluid boluses of 250-1000 mL rapidly and reassess after each bolus. 3
  • Monitor for positive response including ≥10% increase in systolic/mean arterial pressure, ≥10% reduction in heart rate, improved mental status, peripheral perfusion, and urine output. 4

When to Stop Fluid Administration

  • Stop fluid administration immediately when:
    • No improvement in tissue perfusion occurs despite volume loading 4
    • Signs of fluid overload develop (crepitations, respiratory distress) 4
    • Hemodynamic parameters stabilize without further improvement 2

Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness

Preferred Monitoring Approaches

  • Dynamic variables should be used over static variables to predict fluid responsiveness when available (weak recommendation, low quality evidence). 1
  • Dynamic measures include pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation, and passive leg raise testing. 2, 3
  • Static measures like central venous pressure (CVP) have poor predictive ability and should not be relied upon alone. 2, 3

Clinical Reassessment Parameters

  • Perform frequent reassessment including heart rate, blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, temperature, urine output, skin perfusion, and mental status. 1, 3
  • Continuous observation is essential—never leave the septic patient unattended during initial resuscitation. 4

Albumin Considerations

  • Albumin may be added to crystalloids when patients require substantial amounts of crystalloids (weak recommendation, low quality evidence). 1
  • This is not a first-line recommendation but rather a consideration for patients with large ongoing crystalloid requirements. 1

Fluids to Avoid

Strong Contraindications

  • Hydroxyethyl starches are strongly contraindicated for intravascular volume replacement in sepsis or septic shock (strong recommendation, high quality of evidence). 1
  • Hydroxyethyl starches increase mortality and worsen acute kidney injury, particularly in patients with pre-existing renal dysfunction. 2

Weak Recommendations Against

  • Crystalloids are preferred over gelatins when resuscitating patients with sepsis or septic shock (weak recommendation, low quality evidence). 1

Integration with Vasopressor Therapy

  • If hypotension persists despite adequate fluid resuscitation, initiate norepinephrine as the first-choice vasopressor targeting mean arterial pressure ≥65 mmHg (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). 1, 2
  • Consider earlier vasopressor initiation if hypotension persists after initial fluid boluses, particularly in patients with compromised respiratory reserve or signs of fluid intolerance. 4
  • This approach maintains perfusion while limiting excessive fluid administration in vulnerable patients. 4

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Common Errors

  • Do not delay resuscitation due to concerns about fluid overload—delayed resuscitation increases mortality and immediate fluid resuscitation is required. 2, 3
  • Do not rely solely on CVP or other static measures to guide fluid therapy, as they have poor predictive ability for fluid responsiveness. 2, 3
  • Do not neglect continuous reassessment after the initial bolus—ongoing clinical evaluation is essential to determine the need for additional fluids. 3

Special Populations

  • In patients with large pleural effusions or respiratory compromise, administer smaller boluses (250-500 mL) and reassess after each bolus rather than giving the full 30 mL/kg rapidly. 4
  • Stop fluid administration immediately if crepitations develop or respiratory status worsens in these patients. 4
  • In patients with pre-existing acute kidney injury, balanced crystalloids are safer than normal saline to avoid worsening hyperchloremic acidosis and AKI progression. 2

Evolving Evidence and Controversy

While the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines provide strong recommendations for the 30 mL/kg initial bolus, emerging evidence suggests this approach may not be universally beneficial. 5, 6 Some observational data and trials in resource-limited settings have shown potential harm with aggressive fluid resuscitation. 5, 6 However, the current guideline recommendations remain the standard of care based on the best available evidence from high-income healthcare settings. 1 The key is not to view 30 mL/kg as a rigid target but rather as an initial intervention that must be continuously reassessed and adjusted based on individual patient response. 3, 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Sepsis Management Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Initial Fluid Bolus for Sepsis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Fluid Resuscitation in Sepsis with Large Pleural Effusion

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Fluid resuscitation in sepsis: the great 30 mL per kg hoax.

Journal of thoracic disease, 2020

Research

Fluid Resuscitation in Patients Presenting with Sepsis: Current Insights.

Open access emergency medicine : OAEM, 2022

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.