What is the recommended single inhaler triple therapy regimen for patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) requiring an Inhaled Corticosteroid (ICS), Long-Acting Beta2-Adrenergic Agonist (LABA), and Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist (LAMA)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 14, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Single Inhaler Triple Therapy in COPD

Single inhaler triple therapy (SITT) with LAMA/LABA/ICS is the recommended treatment for symptomatic COPD patients at high risk of exacerbations, and should be preferentially administered as a single inhaler rather than multiple inhalers. 1

Patient Selection for Triple Therapy

Triple therapy is indicated for patients meeting ALL of the following criteria:

  • High exacerbation risk: ≥2 moderate exacerbations (requiring antibiotics/oral corticosteroids) OR ≥1 severe exacerbation (requiring hospitalization/ED visit) in the past year 1, 2
  • Moderate to high symptom burden: CAT score ≥10 OR mMRC score ≥2 1, 2
  • Impaired lung function: FEV1 <80% predicted 1, 2

Mortality and Morbidity Benefits

Triple therapy reduces mortality compared to dual LAMA/LABA therapy in high-risk patients, which is the most critical outcome. 2 The evidence demonstrates:

  • Exacerbation reduction: Annual rate of 0.91 exacerbations/year with triple therapy versus 1.21 with LAMA/LABA and 1.07 with ICS/LABA 1, 2
  • Severe exacerbation reduction: 0.13 versus 0.19 severe exacerbations/year compared to LAMA/LABA (rate ratio 0.66,95% CI 0.56-0.78) 1, 2
  • Additional benefits: Improvements in dyspnea, health status, and lung function 2

The IMPACT and ETHOS trials provide the strongest evidence supporting these benefits, with both demonstrating superiority of single-inhaler triple therapy over dual therapy regimens. 1

Single Inhaler Versus Multiple Inhalers

Triple therapy should preferably be administered as a single inhaler (SITT) rather than multiple inhalers. 1 The rationale includes:

  • Improved adherence with single-inhaler formulations 2
  • Reduced inhalation technique errors 2
  • Evidence demonstrates incremental benefit with single-inhaler triple therapy compared to multiple-inhaler triple therapy 1

The guidelines acknowledge that some patients may prefer separate inhalers, but SITT remains the preferred approach. 1

Available Single Inhaler Triple Therapy Combinations

Current fixed-dose triple combinations include:

  • Fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol 3, 4, 5
  • Budesonide/formoterol/glycopyrronium 3, 4
  • Beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol/glycopyrronium 3, 4

ICS Dosing Considerations

Moderate doses of ICS are sufficient; high doses are not necessary and increase adverse effects. 1 The ETHOS trial demonstrated:

  • No significant difference in exacerbation reduction between 320 mg and 160 mg budesonide doses (rate ratio 1.00,95% CI 0.91-1.10) 1
  • Moderate doses (e.g., budesonide 320 μg) demonstrate mortality benefit without requiring higher doses 2

Biomarker-Guided Therapy

Blood eosinophils ≥300 cells/μL identify patients who particularly benefit from ICS-containing triple therapy. 2 This is especially important when considering:

  • Stepping down from triple therapy: Withdrawing ICS in patients with eosinophils ≥300 cells/μL increases risk of moderate-severe exacerbations 1, 2
  • ICS withdrawal may also lower health status and lung function 1

Safety Profile

The pneumonia risk with ICS-containing regimens must be balanced against benefits:

  • Number needed to treat: 4 patients to prevent one moderate-to-severe exacerbation 2
  • Number needed to harm: 33 patients to cause one pneumonia 2
  • The benefit-risk ratio favors triple therapy in appropriate high-risk patients 2

Monitor closely in patients who are current smokers, aged ≥55 years, have history of exacerbations or pneumonia, BMI <25 kg/m², or severe airflow limitation. 2

Notably, pneumonia risk may vary by ICS type, with some evidence suggesting lower risk with beclometasone dipropionate or budesonide compared to fluticasone furoate. 6

When NOT to Use Triple Therapy

Do not step down from triple therapy to dual therapy in high-risk patients (weak recommendation). 1 Specifically:

  • Patients with CAT ≥10 and/or FEV1 <80% predicted should continue triple therapy 1
  • Patients with low exacerbation risk (≤1 moderate exacerbation/year without hospitalization) should start with LAMA/LABA dual therapy instead 1

Treatment Algorithm

For low-risk patients (≤1 moderate exacerbation/year, no hospitalizations):

  • Low symptoms (CAT <10): Start LAMA or LABA monotherapy 1
  • Moderate-high symptoms (CAT ≥10, FEV1 <80%): Start LAMA/LABA dual therapy 1

For high-risk patients (≥2 moderate or ≥1 severe exacerbation/year):

  • With moderate-high symptoms (CAT ≥10, FEV1 <80%): Start LAMA/LABA/ICS triple therapy as initial maintenance therapy 1, 2

Special Considerations

Concomitant asthma: ICS/LABA combination therapy is preferred over LAMA/LABA in patients with COPD and concomitant asthma. 1 However, triple therapy remains appropriate if exacerbation risk is high. 4

ICS monotherapy has no role in COPD: ICS should only be used in combination with long-acting bronchodilators. 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Indications for Triple Therapy in COPD

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA) in COPD: time for a reappraisal.

International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2018

Research

Current appraisal of single inhaler triple therapy in COPD.

International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2018

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.