What is the equivalent axillary temperature for a rectal temperature of 100.4 degrees Fahrenheit?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Axillary Temperature Equivalent for Rectal 100.4°F

A rectal temperature of 100.4°F (38°C) corresponds to an axillary temperature of approximately 99.4°F (37.5°C), using the standard conversion of subtracting 1°F (0.6°C) from the rectal reading.

Temperature Conversion Between Sites

The relationship between rectal and axillary temperatures has been well-established in clinical studies:

  • The mean difference between rectal and axillary temperatures is approximately 1.0°C (1.8°F), with axillary readings consistently lower than rectal measurements 1.

  • In patients older than 1 month, the standard adjustment is to add 1°F to the axillary temperature to estimate the rectal temperature (or conversely, subtract 1°F from rectal to estimate axillary) 1.

  • Therefore, a rectal temperature of 100.4°F would translate to an axillary temperature of approximately 99.4°F 1.

Important Caveats About Axillary Measurements

Accuracy Limitations

  • Axillary measurements have wide limits of agreement (ranging from 0.32°C to 1.98°C difference from rectal), meaning individual readings can vary substantially 2.

  • Axillary thermometers demonstrate good sensitivity (95%) but limited specificity (75%) for detecting fever, making them adequate for screening but requiring confirmation for critical decisions 2.

  • Rectal measurements remain more accurate than oral or axillary methods when precision is essential 3, 4.

Clinical Context Matters

  • In long-term care facility residents and frail elderly, a rectal temperature of 100.4°F already meets the threshold for fever (≥99.5°F rectal on repeated measurements) and warrants clinical evaluation 3, 5.

  • Electronic thermometry is more accurate than mercury thermometry regardless of measurement site 3, 4.

Practical Application

  • Use axillary temperature of 99.4°F as a screening estimate for a rectal reading of 100.4°F 2, 1.

  • Confirm borderline or critical readings with rectal measurement when clinical decisions depend on precise temperature determination 2, 4.

  • Consider that the standard deviation of ±0.45°C means the actual axillary reading could range from approximately 98.6°F to 100.2°F for a true rectal temperature of 100.4°F 1.

References

Research

Comparison of rectal, axillary, and forehead temperatures.

Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine, 1996

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Fever Criteria and Assessment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.