How should a 30-minute Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) using Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) +5 or Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) 0/5 be approached?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Approach to 30-Minute SBT Using CPAP +5 or PSV 0/5

A 30-minute SBT using either CPAP +5 or PSV 0/5 is an acceptable and evidence-based approach for assessing extubation readiness, with the understanding that CPAP +5 (or PSV 5-8 cm H₂O) is preferred over zero pressure support for standard-risk patients, while PSV 0/5 (equivalent to T-piece) may be reserved for high-risk patients requiring more stringent assessment. 1, 2

Duration and Timing

  • 30 minutes is the standard and sufficient duration for most patients, as the majority of SBT failures occur within the first 30 minutes 1, 2
  • For high-risk patients (prolonged ventilation >14 days, chronic lung disease, myocardial dysfunction, neuromuscular disease, or previous failed extubation), consider extending the trial to 60-120 minutes for more accurate assessment 2
  • Daily assessment of readiness for weaning should be performed before initiating any SBT 1, 2

Choice Between CPAP +5 and PSV 0/5

CPAP +5 (or PSV 5-8 cm H₂O) - Preferred for Standard-Risk Patients

  • The American College of Chest Physicians/American Thoracic Society guidelines recommend conducting initial SBTs with modest inspiratory pressure augmentation (5-8 cm H₂O) rather than T-piece or zero pressure support 2
  • Pressure-supported SBTs result in higher success rates (84.6% vs 76.7% for T-piece) and higher extubation success (75.4% vs 68.9%) 2, 3
  • A 30-minute PSV trial with 8 cm H₂O pressure support led to significantly higher rates of successful extubation (82.3% vs 74.0%) compared to 2-hour T-piece trials 3
  • This approach may hasten extubation without increasing reintubation risk 4, 3

PSV 0/5 (Equivalent to T-Piece) - Consider for High-Risk Patients

  • For patients at high risk of extubation failure, CPAP without pressure support augmentation (PSV 0/5) provides a more stringent assessment and may be more specific in identifying patients truly ready for extubation 2
  • T-piece trials are more demanding and may better predict post-extubation work of breathing, though they may unnecessarily delay extubation in some patients 4
  • Among high-risk patients (>65 years or chronic cardiac/respiratory disease), PSV trials did not result in significantly more ventilator-free days compared to T-piece trials 5

Monitoring During the SBT

Signs of Poor Tolerance (Failure Criteria)

  • Respiratory distress: increased respiratory rate, accessory muscle use, paradoxical breathing 1, 2
  • Hemodynamic instability: tachycardia, hypertension, or hypotension 2
  • Gas exchange deterioration: oxygen desaturation or worsening arterial blood gases 1, 2
  • Neurologic changes: altered mental status, agitation, or subjective discomfort 2
  • Diaphoresis or other signs of excessive work of breathing 2

Critical Pre-Extubation Assessment

Passing an SBT does not guarantee successful extubation—approximately 10% of patients who pass will still fail extubation within 48 hours. 1, 2, 6 Therefore, assess these additional factors before extubation:

  • Upper airway patency: risk of post-extubation stridor or edema 1, 2
  • Bulbar function: ability to protect airway and swallow 1, 2
  • Sputum load and cough effectiveness: ability to clear secretions 1, 2, 6
  • Neurologic status: adequate consciousness and airway reflexes 2

Post-Extubation Management

  • For high-risk patients who pass an SBT, strongly consider prophylactic noninvasive ventilation (NIV) immediately after extubation rather than standard oxygen therapy 2, 6
  • Successful extubation is defined as absence of need for ventilatory support for 48 hours 1, 2
  • Close monitoring for 6-24 hours post-extubation with continuous pulse oximetry and cardiac monitoring 6

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not rely solely on SBT success: The SBT assesses respiratory load-to-capacity balance but does not evaluate upper airway patency, bulbar function, or cough effectiveness 1, 6
  • Avoid same-day repeat SBTs after failure: Failed SBTs indicate respiratory muscle fatigue requiring time to resolve; address underlying causes before reattempting 2
  • Beware of pressure-supported SBT limitations: PSV may underestimate post-extubation work of breathing, potentially leading to premature extubation in borderline cases 2, 4
  • Recognize that more frequent screening with PSV may paradoxically delay extubation: One trial found that protocolized frequent screening combined with pressure-supported SBTs increased time to successful extubation 7

Practical Algorithm

  1. Assess daily readiness: Clinical stability, resolution of primary respiratory failure cause, adequate oxygenation (FiO₂ ≤70%, PEEP ≤12 cm H₂O) 1, 2
  2. Choose SBT method: CPAP +5 or PSV 5-8 cm H₂O for standard-risk patients; PSV 0/5 for high-risk patients requiring stringent assessment 2
  3. Conduct 30-minute trial: Monitor for signs of failure; extend to 60-120 minutes if high-risk 1, 2
  4. If SBT passes, assess additional factors: Upper airway, bulbar function, cough, secretions 1, 2
  5. Extubate with appropriate post-extubation support: Prophylactic NIV for high-risk patients 2, 6
  6. If SBT fails, identify and address causes: Do not repeat same day; optimize patient condition before next attempt 2

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.