Mavacamten Treatment Protocol for Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Treatment Positioning
Mavacamten is recommended as second-line therapy for adults with NYHA class II-III obstructive HCM who remain symptomatic despite maximally tolerated beta-blockers or nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers. 1, 2, 3
Treatment Algorithm
First-Line Therapy:
- Initiate nonvasodilating beta-blockers, titrated to resting heart rate <60-65 bpm 1
- Alternative: verapamil or diltiazem (up to 480 mg/day) if beta-blockers are ineffective, contraindicated, or poorly tolerated 1
Second-Line Therapy:
- Add mavacamten for persistent symptoms despite adequate first-line therapy trial 1, 2, 3
- This represents a Class 1 recommendation from the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association 2, 3
Pre-Treatment Requirements
Mandatory assessments before initiating mavacamten:
- Negative pregnancy test in all women of childbearing potential 1, 3
- Baseline echocardiogram with LVEF measurement 3
- Confirmation of adequate trial of first-line therapy 1
Absolute contraindications:
- Pregnancy (teratogenic effects) 1, 2, 3, 4
- Women of childbearing potential must use effective contraception until 4 months after the last dose 3
Dosing Protocol
Initial dosing:
- Start at 5 mg once daily 5
- Dose titrations performed using symptom assessment, LVOT gradient, and LVEF measurements 5
- Available doses: 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg for titration based on response and tolerability 4
CYP2C19 poor metabolizers:
- Mavacamten AUC increases by 241% and half-life extends to 23 days (versus 6-9 days in normal metabolizers) 4
- Approximately 13% of East Asians, 4% of individuals of African ancestry, and 2% of individuals of European ancestry are poor metabolizers 4
Monitoring Requirements
Echocardiographic monitoring schedule:
- Baseline, then every 4 weeks during treatment 3
- Assess LVEF and LVOT gradients (resting and Valsalva) at each visit 5
Critical monitoring timepoints:
- Week 4: Expect mean Valsalva LVOT gradient reduction from ~72 mmHg to ~29 mmHg 5
- Week 8: Sustained gradient reduction to ~29 mmHg 5
- Week 12: Continued gradient reduction to ~30 mmHg 5
Safety Thresholds and Mandatory Interventions
LVEF reduction <50%:
- Mandatory interruption of mavacamten if LVEF falls below 50% at any visit 1, 2, 3
- LVEF reduction risk: 5.7% attributable to drug alone, up to 7-10% when considering other clinical conditions 1, 2
- In real-world experience, only 2-3% of patients required temporary interruption for LVEF <50% 5, 6
- Mean LVEF decreases from ~66% at baseline to ~62% at 12 weeks 5
Persistent systolic dysfunction:
- Discontinue mavacamten if LVEF remains <50% 3
- Consider interruption during intercurrent illness that could affect cardiac function 3
Expected Clinical Outcomes
Efficacy data:
- 30-60% of patients achieve improvement in LVOT gradients, symptoms, and functional capacity 1, 2, 3
- 46% of patients experience ≥1 NYHA class improvement, with an additional 18% achieving ≥2 NYHA class improvement 5
- At 12 weeks, 70% of patients have Valsalva LVOT gradients reduced to <30 mmHg (from 100% at baseline) 5
- Peak oxygen consumption increases by mean of 3.5 mL/kg/min in patients without background medications 7
Long-term outcomes at 56 weeks:
- Only 8.9% of patients in the mavacamten group underwent SRT or remained SRT-eligible 8
- 89% of patients continued mavacamten long-term 8
- Sustained reduction in resting LVOT gradient by -34 mmHg and Valsalva gradient by -46 mmHg 8
Important Drug Interactions
Strong CYP3A4 inhibitors (e.g., ketoconazole):
- Predicted to increase mavacamten AUC by 130% and Cmax by 90% 4
Moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors (verapamil, diltiazem):
- Verapamil increases mavacamten AUC by 16% and Cmax by 52% 4
- Diltiazem predicted to increase AUC by 55% and Cmax by 42% in CYP2C19 poor metabolizers 4
Strong CYP2C19/CYP3A4 inducers (e.g., rifampin):
- Decrease mavacamten AUC by 87% in normal metabolizers 4
Hepatic Impairment Considerations
Dose adjustments needed:
- Mavacamten exposures increase up to 220% in patients with mild (Child-Pugh A) or moderate (Child-Pugh B) hepatic impairment 4
- Effect of severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C) is unknown 4
Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS)
Mandatory REMS program enrollment:
- All prescribers and patients must enroll in the REMS program 2, 5
- Regular echocardiographic monitoring is essential for program compliance 2, 3
- Real-world data demonstrates logistic feasibility of prescribing under REMS at tertiary care centers 5
Critical Caveats
Age restrictions:
Patients without symptomatic improvement:
- Even in 40 patients reporting no symptomatic improvement, mean Valsalva LVOT gradient still decreased significantly from 73 mmHg to 30 mmHg at 12 weeks 5
- This suggests objective hemodynamic improvement may occur independent of subjective symptom relief 5
Adverse events:
- Mostly mild (80%) and unrelated to drug (79%) 7
- Most common drug-related adverse events: decreased LVEF at higher plasma concentrations and atrial fibrillation 7
- In real-world experience, adverse events were rare and seen primarily in patients with advanced disease not represented in clinical trials 6