What was the typical immunosuppression regimen in a kidney transplant (Ktx) study in 2001?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Typical Immunosuppression Regimen in Kidney Transplant Studies Around 2001

The typical immunosuppression regimen in kidney transplant studies around 2001 consisted of triple therapy with a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus), an antiproliferative agent (azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil), and corticosteroids, with variable use of induction therapy. 1

Historical Context of 2001 Practice Patterns

Around 2001, kidney transplant immunosuppression was in a transitional period:

  • Cyclosporine A (CsA) was still widely used as the primary calcineurin inhibitor, though tacrolimus was gaining acceptance after its FDA approval in 1994 for kidney transplantation 2
  • Azathioprine remained common as the antiproliferative agent, though mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was increasingly replacing it after demonstrating superior outcomes in trials from the late 1990s 3
  • Corticosteroids were universally included in maintenance regimens, with steroid-free protocols not yet widely adopted 3

Induction Therapy Patterns

Induction therapy use was inconsistent in 2001:

  • Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) was the most common induction agent when used, particularly for high-risk patients 2
  • IL-2 receptor antagonists (daclizumab, basiliximab) were newly available but not yet standard practice, having been approved in the late 1990s 2
  • Many centers performed transplants without any induction therapy, relying solely on maintenance immunosuppression 2

Maintenance Immunosuppression Components

Calcineurin Inhibitors

  • Cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) was the dominant CNI in most protocols around 2001 2
  • Tacrolimus was used in approximately 20-30% of cases, often reserved for patients with cyclosporine intolerance or acute rejection 2
  • Initial tacrolimus dosing when used was typically 0.1-0.2 mg/kg/day divided every 12 hours 1

Antiproliferative Agents

  • Azathioprine (1-2 mg/kg/day) remained in widespread use despite emerging evidence favoring MMF 3, 4
  • Mycophenolate mofetil was increasingly adopted at doses of 1-2 grams daily, particularly in newer protocols 2

Corticosteroids

  • Prednisone was universally included, typically starting at high doses (0.5-1 mg/kg/day) and tapering to maintenance doses of 5-10 mg/day 3
  • Early steroid withdrawal was not practiced in 2001, as this approach only gained evidence-based support in subsequent years 3

Common Pitfalls in 2001-Era Protocols

  • Higher tacrolimus target levels (10-15 ng/mL) were used, which we now recognize as unnecessarily nephrotoxic 1
  • Inadequate CMV prophylaxis was common, particularly in high-risk donor-positive/recipient-negative combinations 2
  • mTOR inhibitors (sirolimus, everolimus) were just entering clinical use and not part of standard protocols 4

Evolution Since 2001

Current evidence-based practice has evolved significantly:

  • Induction therapy with IL-2 receptor antagonists is now standard for most recipients 3, 1
  • Tacrolimus has replaced cyclosporine as first-line CNI based on superior efficacy 3, 1
  • Mycophenolate has replaced azathioprine as the preferred antiproliferative agent 3, 1
  • Early steroid withdrawal is now acceptable in low-risk patients receiving induction therapy 3

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.