RPR vs IgG for Syphilis Diagnosis
Fundamental Distinction
RPR (Rapid Plasma Reagin) and IgG tests serve completely different diagnostic purposes in syphilis: RPR is a nontreponemal test that measures disease activity and guides treatment decisions, while treponemal IgG tests (like TP-PA, FTA-ABS, TPHA) detect antibodies that remain positive for life regardless of treatment status. 1, 2
RPR (Nontreponemal Test)
What It Measures
- RPR detects antibodies against cardiolipin-cholesterol-lecithin antigens released during cellular damage from active infection 3
- Titers correlate directly with disease activity and should always be reported quantitatively 2
- RPR becomes negative or low-titer after successful treatment in most patients 1
Sensitivity by Disease Stage
- Primary syphilis: 62-78% sensitive (misses 22-38% of early cases) 3, 4
- Secondary syphilis: 97-100% sensitive 3, 4
- Early latent syphilis: 85-100% sensitive 1, 4
- Late latent syphilis: 61-75% sensitive (negative in 25-39% of cases) 1, 4
Clinical Uses
- Primary role: Monitoring treatment response—a fourfold decline in titer indicates successful treatment 1, 2
- Distinguishing active infection from past treated disease 1
- Detecting reinfection (fourfold increase from baseline) 1
- Specificity is 87-100%, with false positives rare at titers ≥1:8 3, 1
Treponemal IgG Tests
What They Measure
- Detect specific antibodies against Treponema pallidum antigens 2, 5
- Include TP-PA, FTA-ABS, TPHA, and automated CLIA/CLEIA assays 6, 5
- Remain positive for life in most patients (85-100%) regardless of treatment 1, 2
Sensitivity by Disease Stage
- Primary syphilis: 82-91% for traditional tests (FTA-ABS, HA, PA); 92-100% for newer CLIA/CLEIA/IC assays 6
- Secondary syphilis: Approaches 100% 5
- All stages: Generally more sensitive than RPR, especially in late disease 6, 7
Clinical Uses
- Primary role: Confirming syphilis exposure (current or past) 2
- Initial screening in reverse algorithm approaches 5
- Cannot be used to monitor treatment response or detect reinfection 1, 2
Critical Diagnostic Algorithm
Both Tests Are Required for Complete Diagnosis
The CDC explicitly states that a positive treponemal test alone is insufficient for diagnosis—nontreponemal tests must also be performed to distinguish active infection from past treated disease. 1, 2
Interpretation Patterns
Pattern 1: RPR+ / Treponemal IgG+
- Indicates active syphilis requiring treatment 2
- Stage determined by clinical findings and RPR titer 1
Pattern 2: RPR- / Treponemal IgG+
- Most commonly represents past treated syphilis 1, 2
- Can also represent late latent/tertiary syphilis with waning nontreponemal antibodies (occurs in 25-39% of late cases) 1, 4
- Requires treatment as late latent syphilis if no documented adequate prior treatment 2
Pattern 3: RPR+ / Treponemal IgG-
Pattern 4: RPR- / Treponemal IgG-
- Rules out syphilis (current or past) 1
Treatment Monitoring: RPR Only
Never use treponemal IgG tests to assess treatment response—they remain positive regardless of cure and correlate poorly with disease activity. 1, 2
Expected RPR Response After Treatment
- Early syphilis: Fourfold decline within 6-12 months indicates success 1
- Late latent syphilis: Fourfold decline within 12-24 months 1
- 15-25% of patients treated during primary syphilis achieve complete RPR seroreversion (negative) after 2-3 years 1
- Many remain "serofast" with persistent low titers (typically <1:8) indefinitely 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Critical Error #1: Switching Between RPR and VDRL
- RPR and VDRL titers are NOT interchangeable and cannot be compared directly 2, 4
- Sequential monitoring must use the same test type, preferably by the same laboratory 1, 2, 4
- If a patient was diagnosed with VDRL, continue using VDRL; if RPR, continue with RPR 4
Critical Error #2: Using Treponemal Tests for Treatment Monitoring
- Treponemal IgG remains positive for life in 75-85% of treated patients 1, 2
- Cannot distinguish treatment success from failure 1
- Cannot detect reinfection 1
Critical Error #3: Misinterpreting RPR-/Treponemal+ Pattern
- This pattern does NOT automatically mean "old treated infection" 1, 2
- In late latent/tertiary syphilis, RPR is negative in 25-39% of active cases 1, 4
- Without documented adequate prior treatment, this pattern requires treatment as late latent syphilis 2
Special Considerations
HIV-Infected Patients
- Standard serologic tests remain accurate for most HIV patients 1, 2
- Some may have atypical responses with unusually low, high, or fluctuating titers 1, 4
- Require more frequent monitoring (every 3 months instead of 6 months) 1
- False-negative serologic tests rarely reported; if clinical suspicion high with negative serology, pursue darkfield examination or biopsy 1