Is 0.45% (half normal) saline suitable for fluid resuscitation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

0.45% Saline is NOT Suitable for Fluid Resuscitation

0.45% (half-normal) saline should not be used for fluid resuscitation in any clinical scenario. This hypotonic solution is inappropriate for volume expansion and has been directly compared to isotonic solutions with inferior outcomes.

Evidence Against 0.45% Saline for Resuscitation

Direct Comparative Data

  • In patients at risk for contrast-induced acute kidney injury, 0.9% saline was superior to 0.45% saline, with 0% versus 5.5% incidence of acute kidney injury (p=0.01) 1
  • The KDIGO guidelines explicitly recommend isotonic volume expansion rather than hypotonic solutions for patients requiring fluid resuscitation 1

Mechanism of Harm

  • Hypotonic solutions cause fluid shifts into the intracellular compartment, failing to adequately expand intravascular volume 2
  • In patients with traumatic brain injury or head trauma, hypotonic solutions like 0.45% saline are contraindicated due to risk of cerebral edema from fluid shift into damaged cerebral tissue 2
  • Hypotonic fluids do not provide adequate sodium delivery to maintain effective plasma volume during resuscitation 1

What Should Be Used Instead

First-Line Recommendation

Balanced crystalloid solutions (Plasma-Lyte, Lactated Ringer's) are the preferred resuscitation fluids for most clinical scenarios 1, 3

  • Reduce 30-day mortality (OR 0.84,95% CI 0.74-0.95) compared to normal saline 3
  • Lower rates of major adverse kidney events, particularly in sepsis 3
  • Better acid-base balance without hyperchloremic acidosis 1, 3

When Isotonic Saline May Be Used

  • Initial resuscitation in trauma or hemorrhagic shock requires isotonic solutions (0.9% saline or balanced crystalloids), not hypotonic 2
  • In traumatic brain injury, 0.9% saline is currently recommended over buffered solutions, though this remains an area of ongoing research 1
  • For contrast-induced nephropathy prevention, isotonic solutions (either 0.9% saline or sodium bicarbonate 1.26%) are indicated 1

Volume and Rate Considerations

  • Limit 0.9% saline to 1-1.5 L maximum if used, then switch to balanced crystalloids to avoid chloride load 3, 4
  • Large volumes of any chloride-rich solution (>5000 mL) are associated with increased mortality 3

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never use 0.45% saline for initial resuscitation in hypovolemia, sepsis, trauma, or hemorrhagic shock 1, 2
  • Avoid all hypotonic solutions in neurosurgical patients or those with elevated intracranial pressure 2
  • Do not confuse maintenance fluid therapy (where hypotonic solutions may occasionally have a role) with resuscitation, which always requires isotonic or hypertonic solutions 1

The historical use of 0.45% saline in some protocols for contrast nephropathy prevention has been superseded by evidence favoring isotonic solutions 1. There is no contemporary indication for 0.45% saline in fluid resuscitation.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Hypernatremia with Crystalloid Solutions

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Fluid Resuscitation with Balanced Crystalloids

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Sodium Imbalance Prevention in Medical Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.