What is the management of pulmonary embolism (PE) based on electrocardiogram (ECG) findings?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 1, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

ECG Findings in Pulmonary Embolism: Diagnostic and Management Implications

The ECG cannot diagnose or exclude pulmonary embolism but serves primarily to exclude alternative diagnoses (particularly acute myocardial infarction and pericarditis) and to assess disease severity through detection of right ventricular strain patterns. 1

Primary Role of ECG in PE Evaluation

The ECG should be obtained immediately in all patients with suspected PE, but its primary utility is in ruling out competing diagnoses rather than confirming PE 2, 1. The European Society of Cardiology emphasizes that ECG must be viewed as one component of a structured diagnostic approach that includes clinical probability assessment, D-dimer testing, and definitive imaging 1.

Key Limitations to Recognize

  • 20-25% of patients with PE, including those with large clot load, have completely normal ECGs 3
  • The ECG has limited diagnostic accuracy with sensitivity of only 50-60% and specificity of 80-90% 1
  • Most ECG changes in PE are non-specific and can occur in numerous other conditions 1

Specific ECG Findings and Their Clinical Significance

High-Specificity Findings (Rare but Meaningful)

Right ventricular strain pattern is the most specific ECG finding for PE, occurring in 11.1% of all PE patients and 17.1% of those with large clot burden, with 97.4% specificity (OR 7.55 for large PE) 3. This pattern includes:

  • T wave inversions in right precordial leads (V1-V4) 2, 1
  • The presence of ≥1 classic RV strain sign is associated with higher adverse event rates 1

Classic but Infrequent Findings

The following findings are highly specific but occur too infrequently to be of predictive value 3:

  • S1Q3T3 pattern: Present in only 3.7% of PE cases 3
  • Right axis deviation: Found in only 4.2% 3
  • P pulmonale: Occurs in only 0.5% 3
  • QR pattern in V1: Indicates acute RV overload 1

Common but Non-Specific Findings

  • Sinus tachycardia: Most frequent abnormality (28%) but lacks specificity 4, 3
  • Right bundle branch block: Occurs in 4.8-9% and is associated with RV strain 1, 3
  • Atrial dysrhythmias (including atrial fibrillation): Present in 10-23.5% of patients 1, 3

Integration into Clinical Prediction Scores

ECG findings should be used in conjunction with clinical prediction scores rather than in isolation 1. The Pisa model specifically incorporates ECG findings of acute cor pulmonale (S1Q3T3, S1S2S3, negative T waves in right precordial leads, transient RBBB, or pseudoinfarction pattern) with a coefficient of 1.96 and odds ratio of 7.11 2.

Management Algorithm Based on Hemodynamic Status

High-Risk PE (Shock or Hypotension)

In hemodynamically unstable patients with suspected PE 2:

  1. Perform bedside transthoracic echocardiography immediately as the most useful initial test 2
  2. Echocardiographic evidence of RV dysfunction is sufficient to prompt immediate reperfusion without further testing in highly unstable patients 2
  3. The absence of echocardiographic signs of RV overload or dysfunction virtually excludes PE as the cause of hemodynamic instability 2, 1
  4. If echocardiography shows RV dysfunction and CT angiography is not immediately feasible, unequivocal signs justify emergency reperfusion treatment 2

Normotensive PE (Intermediate and Low Risk)

For hemodynamically stable patients 2:

  • ECG should be part of comprehensive assessment including clinical probability scores (Wells or Geneva), D-dimer, and definitive imaging 1
  • Continuous ECG monitoring is highly recommended during transport/transfer 1
  • Serial ECG evaluation should be performed as changes and resolution of abnormalities may have prognostic implications 4

Critical Diagnostic Pitfalls

The "Ischemic-Looking" ECG

PE can mimic acute coronary syndrome on ECG, presenting with 5, 6:

  • ST-segment elevation in anterolateral leads (V3-V6) 5
  • Widespread ST depression in anterior precordial leads 6
  • These changes may represent reciprocal changes from myocardial strain in the interventricular septum or RV lateral wall 5

When faced with an "ischemic-looking" ECG in a breathless patient, echocardiography plays a critical role in distinguishing PE from ACS, enabling prompt therapeutic intervention 5, 6.

Right-Sided ECG Leads

Using right-sided ECG derivations can increase diagnostic sensitivity, with 88.1% of PE patients showing at least one abnormality on right-sided ECG 1.

Anticoagulation Following Diagnosis

Once PE is confirmed, initiate anticoagulation promptly 7, 8:

  • For acute PE treatment: Rivaroxaban 15 mg twice daily for 21 days, then 20 mg once daily, or Apixaban 10 mg twice daily for 7 days, then 5 mg twice daily 7, 8
  • For recurrence prevention after ≥6 months of treatment: Apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily or Rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily 7, 8
  • Premature discontinuation of anticoagulation increases the risk of thrombotic events 7, 8

References

Guideline

ECG Changes Associated with Pulmonary Embolism

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

ECG in suspected pulmonary embolism.

Postgraduate medical journal, 2019

Research

Electrocardiographic presentation of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism.

Revista portuguesa de cardiologia : orgao oficial da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia = Portuguese journal of cardiology : an official journal of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology, 2008

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.