Classification of Chemotherapy-Based Regimens
Chemotherapy regimens are classified into four major categories based on drug composition: anthracycline-containing, taxane-containing, combination anthracycline/taxane, and non-anthracycline/non-taxane regimens, with additional classification by administration strategy (sequential, concurrent, or dose-dense scheduling). 1
Primary Classification by Drug Composition
Anthracycline-Containing Regimens
- Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide (AC) - standard 4-cycle regimen 1
- Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide (EC) 1
- Fluorouracil/Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide (FAC/CAF) 1
- Cyclophosphamide/Epirubicin/Fluorouracil (CEF/FEC) 1
- Liposomal doxorubicin ± cyclophosphamide 1
- Doxorubicin or epirubicin monotherapy (weekly or tri-weekly) 1
Taxane-Containing Regimens
- Paclitaxel monotherapy (weekly schedule preferred over tri-weekly) 1
- Docetaxel monotherapy (tri-weekly or weekly, efficacy less schedule-dependent) 1
- Abraxane (nab-paclitaxel) 1
- Docetaxel/Capecitabine 1
- Paclitaxel/Gemcitabine 1
- Paclitaxel/Vinorelbine 1
- Paclitaxel/Carboplatin 1
Combination Anthracycline/Taxane Regimens (Preferred Category)
- Dose-dense AC followed by paclitaxel (every 2 weeks with G-CSF support) - demonstrates 26% reduction in recurrence hazard and 31% reduction in death hazard 1, 2
- AC followed by weekly paclitaxel 1
- Docetaxel/Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide (TAC) 1
- Anthracycline (doxorubicin or epirubicin)/taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel) combinations 1
- FEC followed by docetaxel 1
Non-Anthracycline/Non-Taxane Regimens
- Cyclophosphamide/Methotrexate/Fluorouracil (CMF) - historical standard 1
- Docetaxel/Cyclophosphamide (TC) - preferred for patients with cardiac contraindications 1
- Platinum-based combinations (cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil; carboplatin + gemcitabine) 1
- Capecitabine monotherapy 1
- Vinorelbine monotherapy 1
- Capecitabine + vinorelbine 1
- Vinorelbine ± gemcitabine 1
- Oral cyclophosphamide with or without methotrexate (metronomic chemotherapy) 1
Classification by Administration Strategy
Sequential Regimens
Sequential administration involves completing one drug or combination before starting another, allowing maximum dose intensity of each agent. 1
- AC × 4 cycles followed by paclitaxel × 4 cycles 1
- AC × 4 cycles followed by docetaxel × 4 cycles 1
- Epirubicin followed by paclitaxel followed by cyclophosphamide 1
- CAVP (cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone) followed by docetaxel 1
Concurrent Regimens
Concurrent administration delivers multiple agents simultaneously, potentially increasing synergy but also toxicity. 1
- Docetaxel/Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide (TAC) given together 1
- Epirubicin/Paclitaxel-Cyclophosphamide/Methotrexate/Fluorouracil 1
- Doxorubicin/Paclitaxel (AT) 1
Dose-Dense Regimens
Dose-dense scheduling shortens intervals between cycles from 3 weeks to 2 weeks while maintaining standard doses, requiring G-CSF support. 1, 2
- Dose-dense AC every 2 weeks × 4 cycles followed by paclitaxel every 2 weeks × 4 cycles - Category 1 evidence showing superior outcomes 1, 2
- Dose-dense sequence of epirubicin and paclitaxel 1
- Doxorubicin → Paclitaxel → Cyclophosphamide each as single agent every 2 weeks (dose-dense A-T-C) 1
Classification by Clinical Setting
Neoadjuvant (Primary) Regimens
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is administered before definitive local treatment to downstage disease and assess in vivo treatment response. 1, 3
- AC followed by docetaxel - yields pCR rates 15-20% 1
- Docetaxel/Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide - pCR rates >20% 1
- Epirubicin/Paclitaxel-Cyclophosphamide/Methotrexate/Fluorouracil 1
- CAVP-D (cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone/docetaxel) - pCR 30.8% vs 15.4% without taxane 1
Adjuvant Regimens
Adjuvant chemotherapy is administered after primary tumor control to eliminate micrometastatic disease. 1
- Sequential anthracycline/taxane-based regimen - standard for majority of patients, administered 12-24 weeks (4-8 cycles) 1
- Four cycles of anthracycline- or taxane-based chemotherapy for selected lower-risk patients 1
- CMF for selected lower-risk patients 1
Metastatic/Advanced Disease Regimens
First-Line Metastatic
- Gemcitabine/Cisplatin - Category 1 for bladder cancer and biliary tract cancers 1
- Dose-dense MVAC (DDMVAC) with growth factor support - Category 1, better tolerated and more effective than conventional MVAC 1
- Taxane-based regimens - standard of care after adjuvant anthracycline-based therapy 1
Second-Line Metastatic
- Single-agent taxane or gemcitabine preferred for palliation 1
- Additional options: cisplatin, carboplatin, doxorubicin, 5-FU, ifosfamide, pemetrexed, methotrexate, vinblastine 1
- Eribulin - newer cytotoxic agent 1
- Ixabepilone (not EMA-approved) 1
Classification by Disease-Specific Context
Bladder Cancer Regimens
- Gemcitabine/Cisplatin (21- or 28-day cycles) - Category 1 for metastatic disease 1
- DDMVAC with growth factor support - Category 1 1
- Carboplatin- or taxane-based regimens for cisplatin-ineligible patients - Category 2B 1
Breast Cancer Regimens (HER2-Negative)
- Dose-dense AC followed by paclitaxel - preferred regimen 1, 2
- Docetaxel/Cyclophosphamide (TC) - preferred regimen 1
- TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) - preferred regimen 1
Colorectal Cancer Regimens
- Capecitabine combined with irinotecan - intensified concurrent chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer 1
- Short-course radiotherapy + 12-16 weeks of chemotherapy 1
Critical Implementation Principles
Anthracycline Superiority Context
Anthracycline-containing regimens demonstrate 12% reduction in annual recurrence odds and 11% reduction in death odds compared to CMF, but this benefit may be limited to HER2-positive tumors. 1
Dose-Dense Advantages
Meta-analysis demonstrates dose-dense chemotherapy improves disease-free survival (HR 0.83) and overall survival (HR 0.84) compared to conventional 3-week schedules, particularly effective in highly proliferative tumors. 1, 2
Cisplatin vs Carboplatin
Carboplatin should not be substituted for cisplatin in perioperative settings; for cisplatin-ineligible patients, carboplatin-based regimens have reduced efficacy. 1
Schedule-Dependent Efficacy
Paclitaxel efficacy is highly schedule-dependent (weekly superior to tri-weekly), whereas docetaxel efficacy is less schedule-dependent. 1
G-CSF Requirements
Dose-dense regimens mandate G-CSF support with each cycle to prevent severe neutropenia. 1, 2
Common Clinical Pitfalls
- Never use traditional MVAC dosing - DDMVAC is superior and better tolerated 1
- Avoid anthracyclines in patients with cardiac risk factors - use TC or other non-anthracycline regimens 1
- Do not exceed 5 years of aromatase inhibitor therapy - minimal benefit beyond this duration 1
- Never combine trastuzumab with anthracyclines - significant cardiotoxicity risk 1
- Avoid triple-negative designation alone as indication for combination chemotherapy - not sufficient reason without other high-risk features 1