Among elderly patients with achalasia, is serial dilation comparable to peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in terms of efficacy and safety?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 4, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

POEM vs Serial Dilation in Elderly Achalasia Patients

In elderly patients with achalasia, POEM is equally safe and effective compared to younger patients and should be considered the preferred treatment option over serial pneumatic dilation, particularly for type III achalasia, though both modalities remain viable options depending on patient comorbidities and local expertise. 1, 2, 3

Treatment Selection Framework for Elderly Patients

POEM as Primary Therapy

POEM demonstrates excellent safety and efficacy profiles in elderly patients (≥65 years) with technical success rates of 93.4-99.7% and clinical success rates of 90.8-99% across multiple studies. 4, 5, 3, 6

  • In octogenarians specifically, POEM achieved 93.4% technical success and 90.8% clinical success (Eckardt score ≤3) despite a mean age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index of 6.2 4
  • Patients aged ≥65 years showed comparable outcomes to younger patients with no significant differences in procedural time, complication rates, or treatment success 5, 6
  • Geriatric patients (≥65 years) actually demonstrated greater improvement in timed barium esophagram height at follow-up compared to younger patients 6

Pneumatic Dilation Considerations

For type I and II achalasia, pneumatic dilation remains highly efficacious with 90% first-year success rates and long-term success of 97% at 5 years and 93% at 10 years, offering lower upfront morbidity and cost. 1, 7

  • PD requires anticipation of repeat dilations over years, which may be a consideration in elderly patients with limited life expectancy 1, 7
  • Perforation risk is 0-7% (mostly 3-4%) with mortality <1%, though most perforations occur during first dilation 7

Achalasia Subtype-Specific Recommendations

Type III Achalasia (Spastic)

POEM is definitively the preferred treatment for type III achalasia in elderly patients because it allows unlimited proximal extension of myotomy tailored to the extent of esophageal body spasm. 1, 2, 7

  • Type III achalasia has the poorest response to all other treatments including pneumatic dilation 8
  • The ability to perform longer, calibrated myotomy is critical for optimal outcomes in this subtype 1, 7

Type I and II Achalasia

Both POEM and pneumatic dilation are acceptable first-line options for type I and II achalasia in elderly patients, with treatment selection based on comorbidities, patient preference, and local expertise. 2, 7

  • Type II achalasia has the best response to all forms of therapy 8
  • POEM shows high efficacy in short-term data compared to PD for these subtypes 2

Critical Safety Considerations in Elderly Patients

Adverse Events Profile

Adverse events in elderly POEM patients occur at rates of 14.5% with predominantly mild severity (78.6%), including symptomatic capnoperitoneum/capnomediastinum (most common), inadvertent mucosotomies, and esophageal leaks. 4

  • The adverse event profile is comparable between elderly and younger patients with no significant differences 5, 3, 6
  • Cardiac arrhythmia occurred in 1 patient among 76 octogenarians, highlighting the need for careful perioperative monitoring 4

Post-Procedure Reflux Management

All elderly patients undergoing POEM must be counseled about high risk of reflux esophagitis (10-40% rate) and the potential need for indefinite proton pump inhibitor therapy and surveillance endoscopy. 1, 2, 7

  • Gastroesophageal reflux rates are similar between elderly and younger patients (no significant difference) 5, 6
  • Pharmacologic acid suppression should be strongly considered in the immediate post-POEM setting 7

Procedural Requirements and Expertise

POEM should only be performed by experienced physicians in high-volume centers, as an estimated 20-40 procedures are needed to achieve competence. 1, 2, 7

  • This requirement is particularly critical in elderly patients with higher comorbidity burdens 4
  • Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis at the time of POEM may be sufficient 7

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume elderly patients are poor POEM candidates based solely on age - outcomes are equivalent to younger patients 5, 3, 6
  • Do not overlook the need for comprehensive pre-procedure evaluation including Chicago Classification subtyping via high-resolution manometry, as this critically guides treatment selection 1, 2, 8
  • Do not fail to counsel elderly patients about reflux risk before POEM, as this may influence treatment choice in patients with pre-existing reflux or Barrett's esophagus 1, 7
  • Do not select pneumatic dilation for type III achalasia even in elderly patients, as POEM is definitively superior for this subtype 1, 2, 7

Anticoagulation Management

Elderly patients on anticoagulation require specific perioperative management: 7

  • Low-risk patients: discontinue anticoagulants with preprocedure prothrombin time 7
  • High-risk patients: transition to intravenous heparin, stopped 4-6 hours before and resumed 4-6 hours after procedure 7

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) Treatment Approach for Achalasia and Swallowing Disorders

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Peroral endoscopic myotomy is a safe and effective treatment modality for geriatric patients with achalasia.

Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2020

Guideline

Diagnosis and Management of Achalasia Cardia

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Achalasia Diagnosis and Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.